人权和危害人类罪

Alicia Castro
{"title":"人权和危害人类罪","authors":"Alicia Castro","doi":"10.31672/54.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 1948 Human Rights Declarations, both the American and the Universal, recognized the rights to life, freedom and security, prohibited torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatments or punishment, and required an effective remedy against acts violating fundamental rights. Seventy years later, Uruguay still discusses over impunity of crimes committed within State terrorism. Progress made by judges and Courts towards the identification and prosecution of those responsible has been blocked by subsequent hindrances. The most recent Supreme Court of Justice case law rejects by majority vote the imprescriptibility of such crimes. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the arguments underpinning such decision.","PeriodicalId":440704,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Derecho Público","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DERECHOS HUMANOS Y DELITOS DE LESA HUMANIDAD\",\"authors\":\"Alicia Castro\",\"doi\":\"10.31672/54.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The 1948 Human Rights Declarations, both the American and the Universal, recognized the rights to life, freedom and security, prohibited torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatments or punishment, and required an effective remedy against acts violating fundamental rights. Seventy years later, Uruguay still discusses over impunity of crimes committed within State terrorism. Progress made by judges and Courts towards the identification and prosecution of those responsible has been blocked by subsequent hindrances. The most recent Supreme Court of Justice case law rejects by majority vote the imprescriptibility of such crimes. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the arguments underpinning such decision.\",\"PeriodicalId\":440704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Derecho Público\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Derecho Público\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31672/54.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Derecho Público","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31672/54.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1948年的《美国人权宣言》和《世界人权宣言》都承认生命、自由和安全的权利,禁止酷刑和其他残忍、不人道或有辱人格的待遇或处罚,并要求对侵犯基本权利的行为采取有效补救措施。七十年后,乌拉圭仍在讨论国家恐怖主义内部犯罪不受惩罚的问题。法官和法院在查明和起诉责任人方面取得的进展因后来的障碍而受阻。最近的最高法院判例法以多数票否决了此类罪行的不可时效性。本文的目的是分析支持这一决定的论据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DERECHOS HUMANOS Y DELITOS DE LESA HUMANIDAD
The 1948 Human Rights Declarations, both the American and the Universal, recognized the rights to life, freedom and security, prohibited torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatments or punishment, and required an effective remedy against acts violating fundamental rights. Seventy years later, Uruguay still discusses over impunity of crimes committed within State terrorism. Progress made by judges and Courts towards the identification and prosecution of those responsible has been blocked by subsequent hindrances. The most recent Supreme Court of Justice case law rejects by majority vote the imprescriptibility of such crimes. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the arguments underpinning such decision.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Inteligencia Artificial en la Justicia (Del juez-robot al asistente-robot del juez) José Manuel Martínez Sierra, The European Council against EU law. Editorial Tirant lo Blanch, Valencia, 2021. Crítica al diseño institucional de la Fiscalía Nacional Económica: ¿Órgano de la Administración o persecutor autónomo? Discurso de incorporación de Pablo Ruiz-Tagle a la Academia Chilena de la Lengua como académico correspondiente Ceremonia de homenaje a funcionarios y funcionarias por cumplimiento de décadas en la Facultad de derecho de la Universidad de Chile
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1