在专业纪律诉讼中被驳回的抗辩

James A. McDermott
{"title":"在专业纪律诉讼中被驳回的抗辩","authors":"James A. McDermott","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2022.2132800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1. The rejection by a tribunal of a practitioner’s defence to allegations faced in professional disciplinary and regulatory proceedings, and the relevance of the practitioner having run such a failed defence to the tribunal’s determination of the issues of impairment and sanction, have been the subject of some controversy in numerous statutory appeals in recent years. The judgment of Mrs Justice Collins Rice in Sawati v General Medical Council has, however, provided some helpful clarity for regulators and practitioners alike as to how and when such failed defences can properly be taken into account in determining these issues.","PeriodicalId":232228,"journal":{"name":"Judicial Review","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rejected Defences in Professional Disciplinary Proceedings\",\"authors\":\"James A. McDermott\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10854681.2022.2132800\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"1. The rejection by a tribunal of a practitioner’s defence to allegations faced in professional disciplinary and regulatory proceedings, and the relevance of the practitioner having run such a failed defence to the tribunal’s determination of the issues of impairment and sanction, have been the subject of some controversy in numerous statutory appeals in recent years. The judgment of Mrs Justice Collins Rice in Sawati v General Medical Council has, however, provided some helpful clarity for regulators and practitioners alike as to how and when such failed defences can properly be taken into account in determining these issues.\",\"PeriodicalId\":232228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Judicial Review\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Judicial Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2022.2132800\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Judicial Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2022.2132800","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1. 在近年来的许多法定上诉中,法庭拒绝了执业律师对专业纪律和监管程序中所面临指控的辩护,以及执业律师进行了这种失败的辩护与法庭对损害和制裁问题的决定的相关性,一直是一些争议的主题。然而,Collins Rice法官夫人在Sawati诉总医学委员会案中的判决为监管机构和从业人员提供了一些有益的澄清,即在确定这些问题时如何以及何时可以适当地考虑到这些失败的抗辩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rejected Defences in Professional Disciplinary Proceedings
1. The rejection by a tribunal of a practitioner’s defence to allegations faced in professional disciplinary and regulatory proceedings, and the relevance of the practitioner having run such a failed defence to the tribunal’s determination of the issues of impairment and sanction, have been the subject of some controversy in numerous statutory appeals in recent years. The judgment of Mrs Justice Collins Rice in Sawati v General Medical Council has, however, provided some helpful clarity for regulators and practitioners alike as to how and when such failed defences can properly be taken into account in determining these issues.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Article 2 and Standards of Proof in Inquests: Unintelligible, Unclear, and Unpredictable? Of Codes and Common Law: The Approach to Apparent Bias in Local Government Committees Competing ‘Clear and Unambiguous’ Constructions: Darwall v Dartmoor National Park Authority [2023] EWCA Civ 927 and the Interpretation of Private Acts of Parliament The Curious Case of Boris’ Bishop: Did the First Catholic Prime Minister Fall Foul of s 18 of the Roman Catholic Relief Act 1829? Information Law and Automated Governance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1