混合动力火箭发动机的多物理场建模

A. Ferrero, F. Masseni, L. Muscarà, D. Pastrone
{"title":"混合动力火箭发动机的多物理场建模","authors":"A. Ferrero, F. Masseni, L. Muscarà, D. Pastrone","doi":"10.23967/WCCM-ECCOMAS.2020.213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hybrid rocket engines (HREs) present interesting advantages over liquid rocket engines (LREs) and solid rocket motors (SRMs). In order to appreciate these advantages, one should look into the different combustion characteristics; in the hybrid engines the combustion occurs in a macrodiffusion flame and the oxidizer to fuel ratio changes along the combustion chamber. In solid rockets the oxidizer and fuel are mechanically or chemically bound in a single solid phase and they burn with a microdiffusion flame while, in the liquid engines, the combustion results from a premixed flame. Thus, unlike hybrids, both these engines have an uniform mixture ratio. On the other hand, in hybrid engines it is possible to throttle by modulating only the liquid flow rate, which is simpler than in a liquid engine where two flow rates must be synchronized. Furthermore, the European Union is pushing to proscribe some dangerous liquid propellants such as the hydrazine derivatives. As a consequence, there is a huge interest for the “green” propellants and also in this case the HREs present an optimum choice since they employ low toxicity propellants. Indeed, most hybrid propellants and additives are essentially nontoxic, resulting in minimal local environmental impact. The physical separation of fuel and oxidizer serves also to reduce the probability of an accident, which could lead to propellant release in the environment. An interesting feature is that the HREs seem viable for the lift-off from Mars because the typical solid fuels employed in HREs, contrary from the ones used for SRMs, do not develop cracks when subjected to wide temperature ranges [1]. From an economical point of view the operational cost for hybrid systems is affordable thanks to their safety features and inert propellant [2]. Despite the several advantages of hybrid systems compared to liquid and solid systems, the hybrids have not seen yet a mass production unlike heritage propulsion systems. In fact, the","PeriodicalId":148883,"journal":{"name":"14th WCCM-ECCOMAS Congress","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multiphysics Modelling of a Hybrid Rocket Engine\",\"authors\":\"A. Ferrero, F. Masseni, L. Muscarà, D. Pastrone\",\"doi\":\"10.23967/WCCM-ECCOMAS.2020.213\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Hybrid rocket engines (HREs) present interesting advantages over liquid rocket engines (LREs) and solid rocket motors (SRMs). In order to appreciate these advantages, one should look into the different combustion characteristics; in the hybrid engines the combustion occurs in a macrodiffusion flame and the oxidizer to fuel ratio changes along the combustion chamber. In solid rockets the oxidizer and fuel are mechanically or chemically bound in a single solid phase and they burn with a microdiffusion flame while, in the liquid engines, the combustion results from a premixed flame. Thus, unlike hybrids, both these engines have an uniform mixture ratio. On the other hand, in hybrid engines it is possible to throttle by modulating only the liquid flow rate, which is simpler than in a liquid engine where two flow rates must be synchronized. Furthermore, the European Union is pushing to proscribe some dangerous liquid propellants such as the hydrazine derivatives. As a consequence, there is a huge interest for the “green” propellants and also in this case the HREs present an optimum choice since they employ low toxicity propellants. Indeed, most hybrid propellants and additives are essentially nontoxic, resulting in minimal local environmental impact. The physical separation of fuel and oxidizer serves also to reduce the probability of an accident, which could lead to propellant release in the environment. An interesting feature is that the HREs seem viable for the lift-off from Mars because the typical solid fuels employed in HREs, contrary from the ones used for SRMs, do not develop cracks when subjected to wide temperature ranges [1]. From an economical point of view the operational cost for hybrid systems is affordable thanks to their safety features and inert propellant [2]. Despite the several advantages of hybrid systems compared to liquid and solid systems, the hybrids have not seen yet a mass production unlike heritage propulsion systems. In fact, the\",\"PeriodicalId\":148883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"14th WCCM-ECCOMAS Congress\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"14th WCCM-ECCOMAS Congress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23967/WCCM-ECCOMAS.2020.213\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"14th WCCM-ECCOMAS Congress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23967/WCCM-ECCOMAS.2020.213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

混合动力火箭发动机(HREs)比液体火箭发动机(LREs)和固体火箭发动机(SRMs)具有有趣的优势。为了了解这些优点,我们应该研究一下不同的燃烧特性;在混合动力发动机中,燃烧发生在大扩散火焰中,氧化剂与燃料的比例沿燃烧室变化。在固体火箭中,氧化剂和燃料在机械或化学上结合在一个单一的固体相中,它们用微扩散火焰燃烧,而在液体发动机中,燃烧是由预混火焰产生的。因此,与混合动力发动机不同,这两种发动机的混合比都是均匀的。另一方面,在混合动力发动机中,可以通过仅调节液体流量来节流,这比必须同步两个流量的液体发动机更简单。此外,欧盟正在推动禁止一些危险的液体推进剂,如肼衍生物。因此,人们对“绿色”推进剂有着巨大的兴趣,而且在这种情况下,HREs呈现出最佳选择,因为它们采用了低毒推进剂。事实上,大多数混合推进剂和添加剂基本上是无毒的,对当地环境的影响最小。燃料和氧化剂的物理分离也有助于减少可能导致推进剂释放到环境中的事故的可能性。一个有趣的特点是,高热量燃料似乎适用于从火星发射,因为高热量燃料中使用的典型固体燃料,与用于srm的燃料相反,在受到宽温度范围的影响时不会产生裂纹[1]。从经济角度来看,混合动力系统的运行成本是可以承受的,这要归功于它们的安全特性和惰性推进剂[2]。尽管与液体和固体推进系统相比,混合动力系统有许多优点,但与传统推进系统不同,混合动力系统还没有大规模生产。事实上,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multiphysics Modelling of a Hybrid Rocket Engine
Hybrid rocket engines (HREs) present interesting advantages over liquid rocket engines (LREs) and solid rocket motors (SRMs). In order to appreciate these advantages, one should look into the different combustion characteristics; in the hybrid engines the combustion occurs in a macrodiffusion flame and the oxidizer to fuel ratio changes along the combustion chamber. In solid rockets the oxidizer and fuel are mechanically or chemically bound in a single solid phase and they burn with a microdiffusion flame while, in the liquid engines, the combustion results from a premixed flame. Thus, unlike hybrids, both these engines have an uniform mixture ratio. On the other hand, in hybrid engines it is possible to throttle by modulating only the liquid flow rate, which is simpler than in a liquid engine where two flow rates must be synchronized. Furthermore, the European Union is pushing to proscribe some dangerous liquid propellants such as the hydrazine derivatives. As a consequence, there is a huge interest for the “green” propellants and also in this case the HREs present an optimum choice since they employ low toxicity propellants. Indeed, most hybrid propellants and additives are essentially nontoxic, resulting in minimal local environmental impact. The physical separation of fuel and oxidizer serves also to reduce the probability of an accident, which could lead to propellant release in the environment. An interesting feature is that the HREs seem viable for the lift-off from Mars because the typical solid fuels employed in HREs, contrary from the ones used for SRMs, do not develop cracks when subjected to wide temperature ranges [1]. From an economical point of view the operational cost for hybrid systems is affordable thanks to their safety features and inert propellant [2]. Despite the several advantages of hybrid systems compared to liquid and solid systems, the hybrids have not seen yet a mass production unlike heritage propulsion systems. In fact, the
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Energy Preserving Multiphase Flows: Application to Falling Films On the Quantification of Discretization Uncertainty: Comparison of Two Paradigms Multiphysics Modelling of a Hybrid Rocket Engine On Preconditioning Variable Poisson Equation with Extreme Contrasts in the Coefficients Rectangular Isotropic Kirchhoff-Love Plate on an Elastic Foundation under the Action of Unsteady Elastic Diffusion Perturbations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1