使用控制论计算模型的风险和脆弱性评估:为工业控制系统量身定制

R. Abercrombie, Frederick T. Sheldon, Bob G. Schlicher
{"title":"使用控制论计算模型的风险和脆弱性评估:为工业控制系统量身定制","authors":"R. Abercrombie, Frederick T. Sheldon, Bob G. Schlicher","doi":"10.1145/2746266.2746284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In cybersecurity, there are many influencing economic factors to weigh. This paper considers the defender-practitioner stakeholder points-of-view that involve cost combined with development and deployment considerations. Some examples include the cost of countermeasures, training and maintenance as well as the lost opportunity cost and actual damages associated with a compromise. The return on investment (ROI) from countermeasures comes from saved impact costs (i.e., losses from violating availability, integrity, confidentiality or privacy requirements). A measured approach that informs cybersecurity practice is pursued toward maximizing ROI. To this end for example, ranking threats based on their potential impact focuses security mitigation and control investments on the highest value assets, which represent the greatest potential losses. The traditional approach uses risk exposure (calculated by multiplying risk probability by impact). To address this issue in terms of security economics, we introduce the notion of Cybernomics. Cybernomics considers the cost/benefits to the attacker/defender to estimate risk exposure. As the first step, we discuss the likelihood that a threat will emerge and whether it can be thwarted and if not what will be the cost (losses both tangible and intangible). This impact assessment can provide key information for ranking cybersecurity threats and managing risk.","PeriodicalId":106769,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 10th Annual Cyber and Information Security Research Conference","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk and Vulnerability Assessment Using Cybernomic Computational Models: Tailored for Industrial Control Systems\",\"authors\":\"R. Abercrombie, Frederick T. Sheldon, Bob G. Schlicher\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2746266.2746284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In cybersecurity, there are many influencing economic factors to weigh. This paper considers the defender-practitioner stakeholder points-of-view that involve cost combined with development and deployment considerations. Some examples include the cost of countermeasures, training and maintenance as well as the lost opportunity cost and actual damages associated with a compromise. The return on investment (ROI) from countermeasures comes from saved impact costs (i.e., losses from violating availability, integrity, confidentiality or privacy requirements). A measured approach that informs cybersecurity practice is pursued toward maximizing ROI. To this end for example, ranking threats based on their potential impact focuses security mitigation and control investments on the highest value assets, which represent the greatest potential losses. The traditional approach uses risk exposure (calculated by multiplying risk probability by impact). To address this issue in terms of security economics, we introduce the notion of Cybernomics. Cybernomics considers the cost/benefits to the attacker/defender to estimate risk exposure. As the first step, we discuss the likelihood that a threat will emerge and whether it can be thwarted and if not what will be the cost (losses both tangible and intangible). This impact assessment can provide key information for ranking cybersecurity threats and managing risk.\",\"PeriodicalId\":106769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 10th Annual Cyber and Information Security Research Conference\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 10th Annual Cyber and Information Security Research Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2746266.2746284\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 10th Annual Cyber and Information Security Research Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2746266.2746284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在网络安全中,有许多影响经济因素需要权衡。本文考虑了涉及成本与开发和部署考虑相结合的防御者-实践者利益相关者的观点。一些例子包括反措施、培训和维护的成本,以及失去的机会成本和与妥协有关的实际损害。对策的投资回报(ROI)来自于节省的影响成本(即,因违反可用性、完整性、机密性或隐私要求而造成的损失)。一种可测量的方法,为网络安全实践提供信息,以实现投资回报率最大化。例如,为此目的,根据威胁的潜在影响对其进行排名,将安全缓解和控制投资集中在价值最高的资产上,这些资产代表着最大的潜在损失。传统方法使用风险暴露(通过将风险概率乘以影响来计算)。为了从安全经济学的角度解决这个问题,我们引入了控制论的概念。控制论考虑攻击者/防御者的成本/收益来评估风险暴露。作为第一步,我们讨论威胁出现的可能性,是否可以阻止它,如果不能,成本将是什么(有形和无形的损失)。这种影响评估可以为网络安全威胁排名和风险管理提供关键信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk and Vulnerability Assessment Using Cybernomic Computational Models: Tailored for Industrial Control Systems
In cybersecurity, there are many influencing economic factors to weigh. This paper considers the defender-practitioner stakeholder points-of-view that involve cost combined with development and deployment considerations. Some examples include the cost of countermeasures, training and maintenance as well as the lost opportunity cost and actual damages associated with a compromise. The return on investment (ROI) from countermeasures comes from saved impact costs (i.e., losses from violating availability, integrity, confidentiality or privacy requirements). A measured approach that informs cybersecurity practice is pursued toward maximizing ROI. To this end for example, ranking threats based on their potential impact focuses security mitigation and control investments on the highest value assets, which represent the greatest potential losses. The traditional approach uses risk exposure (calculated by multiplying risk probability by impact). To address this issue in terms of security economics, we introduce the notion of Cybernomics. Cybernomics considers the cost/benefits to the attacker/defender to estimate risk exposure. As the first step, we discuss the likelihood that a threat will emerge and whether it can be thwarted and if not what will be the cost (losses both tangible and intangible). This impact assessment can provide key information for ranking cybersecurity threats and managing risk.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Automobile ECU Design to Avoid Data Tampering Controlling Combinatorial Complexity in Software and Malware Behavior Computation On the Design of Jamming-Aware Safety Applications in VANETs Android Malware Static Analysis Techniques OPNET/Simulink Based Testbed for Disturbance Detection in the Smart Grid
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1