三维锁定钢板与常规微型钢板治疗下颌前路骨折

Hesham Abd elnasser, A. Elfar, Mansour Hussien
{"title":"三维锁定钢板与常规微型钢板治疗下颌前路骨折","authors":"Hesham Abd elnasser, A. Elfar, Mansour Hussien","doi":"10.21608/ajdsm.2020.48431.1132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of 2-mm 3D locking miniplate in the management of anterior mandibular fracture and to compare it with Champy’s miniplate. Subjects and methods: prospective, randomized, clinical trial was done on 30 patients complaining of mandibular anterior fractures They were divided into 2 equal groups. Group A: treated with 2mm 3D locking miniplates . Group B: treated with two conventional miniplates using Champy’s principles of osteosynthesis. Postoperative follow up was done at 1 week, 4 weeks, 3 months. The patients were evaluated according to the outcomes of the study, that was working time, wound dehiscence, infection, segmental mobility, postoperative occlusion, need for postoperative IMF, need for plate removal, and radiological evaluation of reduction and fixation. Results: The average operating time required for group (A) was approximately 8.94 min less than that required for group (B). The postoperative radiographs showed excellent reduction in all cases, with alignment of the osseous borders of the mandible. There was no incidence of wound dehiscence, tooth damage, segmental mobility and nerve damage in either group. There was statistically non-significant difference between two groups regarding occlusion; occlusion was satisfactory in most cases of both groups. Conclusion: There was no major difference in terms of treatment outcome and both the systems are equally effective in anterior mandibular fracture treatment and provide sufficient rigidity often avoiding/decreasing the need for IMF.","PeriodicalId":117944,"journal":{"name":"Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three-dimensional locking plate and conventional mini plates in the treatment of mandibular anterior fractures\",\"authors\":\"Hesham Abd elnasser, A. Elfar, Mansour Hussien\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/ajdsm.2020.48431.1132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of 2-mm 3D locking miniplate in the management of anterior mandibular fracture and to compare it with Champy’s miniplate. Subjects and methods: prospective, randomized, clinical trial was done on 30 patients complaining of mandibular anterior fractures They were divided into 2 equal groups. Group A: treated with 2mm 3D locking miniplates . Group B: treated with two conventional miniplates using Champy’s principles of osteosynthesis. Postoperative follow up was done at 1 week, 4 weeks, 3 months. The patients were evaluated according to the outcomes of the study, that was working time, wound dehiscence, infection, segmental mobility, postoperative occlusion, need for postoperative IMF, need for plate removal, and radiological evaluation of reduction and fixation. Results: The average operating time required for group (A) was approximately 8.94 min less than that required for group (B). The postoperative radiographs showed excellent reduction in all cases, with alignment of the osseous borders of the mandible. There was no incidence of wound dehiscence, tooth damage, segmental mobility and nerve damage in either group. There was statistically non-significant difference between two groups regarding occlusion; occlusion was satisfactory in most cases of both groups. Conclusion: There was no major difference in terms of treatment outcome and both the systems are equally effective in anterior mandibular fracture treatment and provide sufficient rigidity often avoiding/decreasing the need for IMF.\",\"PeriodicalId\":117944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/ajdsm.2020.48431.1132\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ajdsm.2020.48431.1132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价2mm 3D锁定微型钢板治疗下颌骨前骨折的疗效,并与Champy微型钢板进行比较。对象和方法:对30例主诉下颌前路骨折患者进行前瞻性、随机、临床试验,随机分为2组。A组:采用2mm 3D锁定微型钢板处理。B组:使用两个常规微型钢板,采用Champy’s原则进行骨固定。术后随访时间分别为1周、4周、3个月。根据研究结果对患者进行评估,包括工作时间、伤口裂开、感染、节段活动度、术后咬合、术后IMF需要、钢板取出需要以及复位和固定的影像学评估。结果:A组平均手术时间比B组缩短约8.94 min。术后x线片显示所有病例复位良好,下颌骨缘对齐。两组均无创面裂开、牙损伤、节段性活动和神经损伤发生。两组在咬合方面差异无统计学意义;两组大多数病例的咬合效果都令人满意。结论:两种系统在治疗效果上无明显差异,两种系统在治疗前颌骨骨折方面同样有效,并提供足够的刚度,通常避免/减少对IMF的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Three-dimensional locking plate and conventional mini plates in the treatment of mandibular anterior fractures
Objective: This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of 2-mm 3D locking miniplate in the management of anterior mandibular fracture and to compare it with Champy’s miniplate. Subjects and methods: prospective, randomized, clinical trial was done on 30 patients complaining of mandibular anterior fractures They were divided into 2 equal groups. Group A: treated with 2mm 3D locking miniplates . Group B: treated with two conventional miniplates using Champy’s principles of osteosynthesis. Postoperative follow up was done at 1 week, 4 weeks, 3 months. The patients were evaluated according to the outcomes of the study, that was working time, wound dehiscence, infection, segmental mobility, postoperative occlusion, need for postoperative IMF, need for plate removal, and radiological evaluation of reduction and fixation. Results: The average operating time required for group (A) was approximately 8.94 min less than that required for group (B). The postoperative radiographs showed excellent reduction in all cases, with alignment of the osseous borders of the mandible. There was no incidence of wound dehiscence, tooth damage, segmental mobility and nerve damage in either group. There was statistically non-significant difference between two groups regarding occlusion; occlusion was satisfactory in most cases of both groups. Conclusion: There was no major difference in terms of treatment outcome and both the systems are equally effective in anterior mandibular fracture treatment and provide sufficient rigidity often avoiding/decreasing the need for IMF.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of clinical effect of titanium-prepared platelet-rich fibrin and platelet- rich fibrin in treatment of gingival recession Fracture resistance of CAD CAM endocrowns bonded to teeth with different number of remaining walls :An In-Vitro Study. Evaluation of the effect of vitamin D on the salivary and serum levels of interleukin-8 in patients with periodontitis stage I and II grade A. The Effectiveness Of Topical Avocado In The Treatment Of Minor Recurrent Aphthous Ulceration: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Modulus of Elasticity of Different Resin Denture Base Materials: A Comparative Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1