下一代火星通信轨道器的轨道星座评估

Yeshua Noriega Long, Charles Lee, R. Gladden
{"title":"下一代火星通信轨道器的轨道星座评估","authors":"Yeshua Noriega Long, Charles Lee, R. Gladden","doi":"10.1109/AERO55745.2023.10115642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Next-Generation Mars Telecommunications Orbiters, a.k.a. Mars ComBirds, (MCB), are intended to serve as a deep-space relay hub that provides high-performance links to Earth at extreme data rates and to increase data return from a variety of Mars rovers, landers, aerobots, and science orbiters. As the current science orbiters used for relay are aging, the needs for these MCBs are becoming realistic, justified, and increasingly urgent. The message is further echoed when demands for Earth return data for next-decade missions to Mars, such as ExoMars, Mars Ice Mapper, Mars Sample Return, and future human exploration missions to the Red Planet, continue to increase. In addition, by communicating directly to these MCBs instead of Earth, communications systems for future science missions can be reduced. Thus, the costs can be lowered, or more science equipment can be added. Furthermore, MCBs' fields of view with Earth are much longer; therefore, an appropriate choice of orbits, a network of MCBs with cross-link capability can connect any users at Mars with Earth almost continuously. In this paper, we primarily provide a trade study on the design of the MCB orbits, which include the number of orbits, sizes, shapes, and orientations. Special attention is also given to a class of orbits that provides daily repeating ground tracks. These orbits can facilitate surface operations because they rise and set daily over a specific area at constant revisiting times. In addition, there is another class of orbits where a spacecraft would tug a science orbiter to a sun-sync Mars orbit and then raise its altitude and serve as a relay orbiter. More particularly, we will consider different orbit types such as (1) circular equatorial, (2) circular sun-sync, (3) Apoapsis at Constant time-of-day Critically Inclined (ACCI), (4) Apoapsis at Constant time-of-day Equatorial (ACE), and (5) SEP- Tugs. Mars surface users are assumed to be global and of any longitude and latitude. For users in orbit, we assume their orbital parameters similar to the typical low-Mars sun-sync orbits such as Mars Odyssey and Mars Reconnaissance orbiters. JPL-developed Telecom Orbit Analysis and Simulation Tool (TOAST) software is used to compute the contacts between the orbiters and users. The performance of these orbit constellations can be assessed through several metrics of interest, which include the maximum latitude, number of contacts per sol, contact duration, total contact time per sol, and maximum communication gap. Recommendations for the optimal orbital constellation choices (3-planar and coplanar variations) will be provided based on comparing the weighted means of each metric calculated at latitude-longitude coordinates during a simulation duration of 1 sol. The chosen orbits will then be further investigated in greater depth to weigh the pros and cons regarding a satellite's operational capabilities and limitations at that orbit.","PeriodicalId":344285,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE Aerospace Conference","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Orbit Constellation Assessment for the Next-Generation Mars Telecommunications Orbiters\",\"authors\":\"Yeshua Noriega Long, Charles Lee, R. Gladden\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/AERO55745.2023.10115642\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Next-Generation Mars Telecommunications Orbiters, a.k.a. Mars ComBirds, (MCB), are intended to serve as a deep-space relay hub that provides high-performance links to Earth at extreme data rates and to increase data return from a variety of Mars rovers, landers, aerobots, and science orbiters. As the current science orbiters used for relay are aging, the needs for these MCBs are becoming realistic, justified, and increasingly urgent. The message is further echoed when demands for Earth return data for next-decade missions to Mars, such as ExoMars, Mars Ice Mapper, Mars Sample Return, and future human exploration missions to the Red Planet, continue to increase. In addition, by communicating directly to these MCBs instead of Earth, communications systems for future science missions can be reduced. Thus, the costs can be lowered, or more science equipment can be added. Furthermore, MCBs' fields of view with Earth are much longer; therefore, an appropriate choice of orbits, a network of MCBs with cross-link capability can connect any users at Mars with Earth almost continuously. In this paper, we primarily provide a trade study on the design of the MCB orbits, which include the number of orbits, sizes, shapes, and orientations. Special attention is also given to a class of orbits that provides daily repeating ground tracks. These orbits can facilitate surface operations because they rise and set daily over a specific area at constant revisiting times. In addition, there is another class of orbits where a spacecraft would tug a science orbiter to a sun-sync Mars orbit and then raise its altitude and serve as a relay orbiter. More particularly, we will consider different orbit types such as (1) circular equatorial, (2) circular sun-sync, (3) Apoapsis at Constant time-of-day Critically Inclined (ACCI), (4) Apoapsis at Constant time-of-day Equatorial (ACE), and (5) SEP- Tugs. Mars surface users are assumed to be global and of any longitude and latitude. For users in orbit, we assume their orbital parameters similar to the typical low-Mars sun-sync orbits such as Mars Odyssey and Mars Reconnaissance orbiters. JPL-developed Telecom Orbit Analysis and Simulation Tool (TOAST) software is used to compute the contacts between the orbiters and users. The performance of these orbit constellations can be assessed through several metrics of interest, which include the maximum latitude, number of contacts per sol, contact duration, total contact time per sol, and maximum communication gap. Recommendations for the optimal orbital constellation choices (3-planar and coplanar variations) will be provided based on comparing the weighted means of each metric calculated at latitude-longitude coordinates during a simulation duration of 1 sol. The chosen orbits will then be further investigated in greater depth to weigh the pros and cons regarding a satellite's operational capabilities and limitations at that orbit.\",\"PeriodicalId\":344285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 IEEE Aerospace Conference\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 IEEE Aerospace Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO55745.2023.10115642\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE Aerospace Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO55745.2023.10115642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

下一代火星通信轨道器,又名火星组合鸟(MCB),旨在作为深空中继中心,以极高的数据速率提供与地球的高性能链路,并增加各种火星探测器、着陆器、航空机器人和科学轨道器的数据返回。由于目前用于中继的科学轨道器老化,对这些mcb的需求变得现实、合理和日益紧迫。未来十年的火星任务,如ExoMars、火星冰测绘、火星样本返回和未来人类对红色星球的探索任务,对地球返回数据的需求不断增加,这一信息得到了进一步的回应。此外,通过直接与这些mcb通信而不是与地球通信,可以减少未来科学任务的通信系统。因此,成本可以降低,或者可以增加更多的科学设备。此外,mcb在地球上的视野要长得多;因此,只要选择合适的轨道,一个具有交联能力的mcb网络就可以几乎不间断地将火星上的任何用户与地球连接起来。在本文中,我们主要对MCB轨道的设计进行了贸易研究,包括轨道的数量,大小,形状和方向。还特别注意一类每天提供重复地面轨道的轨道。这些轨道可以促进地面操作,因为它们每天都在特定区域上升和固定,并不断地重新访问。此外,还有另一类轨道,其中航天器将把科学轨道拖到与太阳同步的火星轨道上,然后提高其高度,充当中继轨道。更具体地说,我们将考虑不同的轨道类型,如(1)赤道圆形轨道,(2)太阳同步圆形轨道,(3)临界倾斜恒定时刻远地点(ACCI),(4)赤道恒定时刻远地点(ACE)和(5)SEP-拖轨轨道。假设火星表面的用户是全球性的,可以在任何经度和纬度上使用。对于在轨用户,我们假设他们的轨道参数类似于典型的低火星太阳同步轨道,如火星奥德赛和火星侦察轨道器。利用jpl开发的电信轨道分析与仿真工具(TOAST)软件计算轨道器与用户之间的接触。这些轨道星座的性能可以通过几个感兴趣的指标来评估,这些指标包括最大纬度、每个sol的接触次数、接触持续时间、每个sol的总接触时间和最大通信间隔。在1个sol的模拟持续时间内,将通过比较经纬度坐标计算的每个度量的加权平均值,提供最佳轨道星座选择(3面和共面变化)的建议。然后将对所选轨道进行更深入的研究,以权衡卫星在该轨道上的运行能力和限制的利弊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On the Orbit Constellation Assessment for the Next-Generation Mars Telecommunications Orbiters
The Next-Generation Mars Telecommunications Orbiters, a.k.a. Mars ComBirds, (MCB), are intended to serve as a deep-space relay hub that provides high-performance links to Earth at extreme data rates and to increase data return from a variety of Mars rovers, landers, aerobots, and science orbiters. As the current science orbiters used for relay are aging, the needs for these MCBs are becoming realistic, justified, and increasingly urgent. The message is further echoed when demands for Earth return data for next-decade missions to Mars, such as ExoMars, Mars Ice Mapper, Mars Sample Return, and future human exploration missions to the Red Planet, continue to increase. In addition, by communicating directly to these MCBs instead of Earth, communications systems for future science missions can be reduced. Thus, the costs can be lowered, or more science equipment can be added. Furthermore, MCBs' fields of view with Earth are much longer; therefore, an appropriate choice of orbits, a network of MCBs with cross-link capability can connect any users at Mars with Earth almost continuously. In this paper, we primarily provide a trade study on the design of the MCB orbits, which include the number of orbits, sizes, shapes, and orientations. Special attention is also given to a class of orbits that provides daily repeating ground tracks. These orbits can facilitate surface operations because they rise and set daily over a specific area at constant revisiting times. In addition, there is another class of orbits where a spacecraft would tug a science orbiter to a sun-sync Mars orbit and then raise its altitude and serve as a relay orbiter. More particularly, we will consider different orbit types such as (1) circular equatorial, (2) circular sun-sync, (3) Apoapsis at Constant time-of-day Critically Inclined (ACCI), (4) Apoapsis at Constant time-of-day Equatorial (ACE), and (5) SEP- Tugs. Mars surface users are assumed to be global and of any longitude and latitude. For users in orbit, we assume their orbital parameters similar to the typical low-Mars sun-sync orbits such as Mars Odyssey and Mars Reconnaissance orbiters. JPL-developed Telecom Orbit Analysis and Simulation Tool (TOAST) software is used to compute the contacts between the orbiters and users. The performance of these orbit constellations can be assessed through several metrics of interest, which include the maximum latitude, number of contacts per sol, contact duration, total contact time per sol, and maximum communication gap. Recommendations for the optimal orbital constellation choices (3-planar and coplanar variations) will be provided based on comparing the weighted means of each metric calculated at latitude-longitude coordinates during a simulation duration of 1 sol. The chosen orbits will then be further investigated in greater depth to weigh the pros and cons regarding a satellite's operational capabilities and limitations at that orbit.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Mission for Education and Multimedia Engagement: Breaking the Barriers to Satellite Education TID Testing of COTS-based, Two-Phase, Point-of-Load Converters for Aerospace Applications Point-Source Target Detection and Localization in Single-Frame Infrared Imagery Comparative Analysis of Different Profiles of Riblets on an Airfoil using Large Eddy Simulations A Receiver-Independent GNSS Smart Antenna for Simultaneous Jamming and Spoofing Protection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1