多少科学家才能拥有知识?

J. Ridder
{"title":"多少科学家才能拥有知识?","authors":"J. Ridder","doi":"10.4324/9780203703809-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Contemporary scientific research, especially in most of the STEM disciplines and the social sciences, is massively collaborative. This chapter focuses on a characterization of knowledge that is widely endorsed in epistemology. According to it, knowledge is warranted true belief, where warrant is a general epistemically good-making property that makes the difference between a belief’s being merely true and its constituting knowledge. It describes knowledge as warranted true belief. Because scientific knowledge is high-grade knowledge, scientific warrant must consist of explicit evidence and reasons. Traditionally, knowledge has been conceived as involving individual mental states and this is why many philosophers reject the idea that there can be genuinely collective knowledge. The philosopher of science Philip Kitcher refers to ‘the traditional conception of knowledge as something that is located in an individual subject’. Knowledge plays various functional roles in intellectual and practical lives.","PeriodicalId":183754,"journal":{"name":"What Is Scientific Knowledge?","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Many Scientists Does It Take to Have Knowledge?\",\"authors\":\"J. Ridder\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9780203703809-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Contemporary scientific research, especially in most of the STEM disciplines and the social sciences, is massively collaborative. This chapter focuses on a characterization of knowledge that is widely endorsed in epistemology. According to it, knowledge is warranted true belief, where warrant is a general epistemically good-making property that makes the difference between a belief’s being merely true and its constituting knowledge. It describes knowledge as warranted true belief. Because scientific knowledge is high-grade knowledge, scientific warrant must consist of explicit evidence and reasons. Traditionally, knowledge has been conceived as involving individual mental states and this is why many philosophers reject the idea that there can be genuinely collective knowledge. The philosopher of science Philip Kitcher refers to ‘the traditional conception of knowledge as something that is located in an individual subject’. Knowledge plays various functional roles in intellectual and practical lives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":183754,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"What Is Scientific Knowledge?\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"What Is Scientific Knowledge?\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203703809-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"What Is Scientific Knowledge?","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203703809-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

当代科学研究,特别是在大多数STEM学科和社会科学领域,是大规模合作的。本章着重于认识论中广泛认可的知识表征。根据它,知识是有保证的真信念,其中保证是一种普遍的认识论上的好属性它区分了一个信念仅仅是真的和构成它的知识之间的区别。它将知识描述为有保证的真实信念。由于科学知识是高级知识,科学保证必须由明确的证据和理由组成。传统上,知识被认为涉及个人的精神状态,这就是为什么许多哲学家拒绝承认存在真正的集体知识的原因。科学哲学家菲利普·基彻(Philip Kitcher)将“知识的传统概念视为位于个体主体中的东西”。知识在智力生活和实际生活中扮演着各种各样的功能角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How Many Scientists Does It Take to Have Knowledge?
Contemporary scientific research, especially in most of the STEM disciplines and the social sciences, is massively collaborative. This chapter focuses on a characterization of knowledge that is widely endorsed in epistemology. According to it, knowledge is warranted true belief, where warrant is a general epistemically good-making property that makes the difference between a belief’s being merely true and its constituting knowledge. It describes knowledge as warranted true belief. Because scientific knowledge is high-grade knowledge, scientific warrant must consist of explicit evidence and reasons. Traditionally, knowledge has been conceived as involving individual mental states and this is why many philosophers reject the idea that there can be genuinely collective knowledge. The philosopher of science Philip Kitcher refers to ‘the traditional conception of knowledge as something that is located in an individual subject’. Knowledge plays various functional roles in intellectual and practical lives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What Are the Limits of Scientific Explanation? How Do Medical Researchers Make Causal Inferences? Is Science Really Value Free and Objective? How Can We Tell Science from Pseudoscience? What Grounds Do We Have for the Validity of Scientific Findings?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1