用ALGOL 68中的插图说明LL与LR解析

R. Hunter, A. McGettrick, R. Patel
{"title":"用ALGOL 68中的插图说明LL与LR解析","authors":"R. Hunter, A. McGettrick, R. Patel","doi":"10.1145/800238.807142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relative merits of LL and LR parsing methods are compared, particular reference being made to ALGOL 68. The fact that LR methods can be applied to a wider class of languages does not seem to give them a significant advantage in practice.","PeriodicalId":226613,"journal":{"name":"Strathclyde ALGOL 68 Conference","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1977-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LL versus LR parsing with illustrations from ALGOL 68\",\"authors\":\"R. Hunter, A. McGettrick, R. Patel\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/800238.807142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The relative merits of LL and LR parsing methods are compared, particular reference being made to ALGOL 68. The fact that LR methods can be applied to a wider class of languages does not seem to give them a significant advantage in practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":226613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Strathclyde ALGOL 68 Conference\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1977-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Strathclyde ALGOL 68 Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/800238.807142\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strathclyde ALGOL 68 Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/800238.807142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

比较了LL和LR两种解析方法的相对优点,特别提到了ALGOL 68。事实上,LR方法可以应用于更广泛的语言类别,但在实践中似乎并没有给它们带来显著的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
LL versus LR parsing with illustrations from ALGOL 68
The relative merits of LL and LR parsing methods are compared, particular reference being made to ALGOL 68. The fact that LR methods can be applied to a wider class of languages does not seem to give them a significant advantage in practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ALGOL 68 and structured programming for learner-programmers ALGOL 68 might-have-beens 'Run-time profiling of Algol 68-R programs using DIDYMUS and SCAMP' The ALGOL 68 compiler of Paris-XI University (Orsay) Implementation of a PDP11/ICL1900 cross assembler in Algol 68R
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1