基于LSTM网络的基于脑电图的情感识别中主体依赖与主体独立策略的比较研究

Debarshi Nath, Anubhav, Mrigank Singh, Divyashikha Sethia, Diksha Kalra, S. Indu
{"title":"基于LSTM网络的基于脑电图的情感识别中主体依赖与主体独立策略的比较研究","authors":"Debarshi Nath, Anubhav, Mrigank Singh, Divyashikha Sethia, Diksha Kalra, S. Indu","doi":"10.1145/3388142.3388167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper addresses the problem of EEG-based emotion recognition and classification and investigates the performance of classifiers for subject-independent and subject-dependent models separately. The results are compared with other classifiers and also with existing work in the concerned domain as well. We perform the experiments on the publicly available DEAP dataset with band power as the feature and classification accuracies are found pertaining to the widely accepted Valence-Arousal Model. The best results were reported by the LSTM model in case of the subject-dependent model with accuracies of 94.69% and 93.13% on valence and arousal scales respectively. SVM performed the best for the subject-independent model with accuracies of 72.19% on valence scale and 71.25% on arousal scale.","PeriodicalId":409298,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2020 the 4th International Conference on Compute and Data Analysis","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study of Subject-Dependent and Subject-Independent Strategies for EEG-Based Emotion Recognition using LSTM Network\",\"authors\":\"Debarshi Nath, Anubhav, Mrigank Singh, Divyashikha Sethia, Diksha Kalra, S. Indu\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3388142.3388167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper addresses the problem of EEG-based emotion recognition and classification and investigates the performance of classifiers for subject-independent and subject-dependent models separately. The results are compared with other classifiers and also with existing work in the concerned domain as well. We perform the experiments on the publicly available DEAP dataset with band power as the feature and classification accuracies are found pertaining to the widely accepted Valence-Arousal Model. The best results were reported by the LSTM model in case of the subject-dependent model with accuracies of 94.69% and 93.13% on valence and arousal scales respectively. SVM performed the best for the subject-independent model with accuracies of 72.19% on valence scale and 71.25% on arousal scale.\",\"PeriodicalId\":409298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2020 the 4th International Conference on Compute and Data Analysis\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2020 the 4th International Conference on Compute and Data Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3388142.3388167\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2020 the 4th International Conference on Compute and Data Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3388142.3388167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

摘要

本文研究了基于脑电图的情感识别和分类问题,并分别研究了主体独立模型和主体依赖模型的分类器性能。结果与其他分类器进行了比较,并与相关领域的现有工作进行了比较。我们在公开可用的DEAP数据集上进行实验,带功率作为特征和分类精度被发现与广泛接受的Valence-Arousal模型有关。在被试依赖模型中,LSTM模型在效价和唤醒量表上的准确率分别为94.69%和93.13%。支持向量机在主体独立模型上表现最好,在效价量表上的准确率为72.19%,在唤醒量表上的准确率为71.25%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Comparative Study of Subject-Dependent and Subject-Independent Strategies for EEG-Based Emotion Recognition using LSTM Network
This paper addresses the problem of EEG-based emotion recognition and classification and investigates the performance of classifiers for subject-independent and subject-dependent models separately. The results are compared with other classifiers and also with existing work in the concerned domain as well. We perform the experiments on the publicly available DEAP dataset with band power as the feature and classification accuracies are found pertaining to the widely accepted Valence-Arousal Model. The best results were reported by the LSTM model in case of the subject-dependent model with accuracies of 94.69% and 93.13% on valence and arousal scales respectively. SVM performed the best for the subject-independent model with accuracies of 72.19% on valence scale and 71.25% on arousal scale.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Framework for Intelligent Navigation Using Latent Dirichlet Allocation on Reddit Posts About Opiates Design of the base isolation system with artificial neural network models An Approach to Temporal Phase Classification on Videos of the Volleyball's Basic Reception Technique A Hybrid Model of Clustering and Neural Network Using Weather Conditions for Energy Management in Buildings Sentiment and Emotion Analyses for Malaysian Mobile Digital Payment Applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1