大多数学生需要亲自授课吗?一个大型统计班的研究

Ellen S. Fireman, Zachary S. Donnini, M. Weissman, Daniel J. Eck
{"title":"大多数学生需要亲自授课吗?一个大型统计班的研究","authors":"Ellen S. Fireman, Zachary S. Donnini, M. Weissman, Daniel J. Eck","doi":"10.1177/00472395231166592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over 1100 students over four semesters were given the option of taking an introductory undergraduate statistics class either by in-person attendance in lectures or by taking exactly the same class (same instructor, recorded lectures, homework, blind grading, website, etc.) without the in-person lectures. Roughly, equal numbers of students chose each option. The online students did slightly better on computer-graded exams. The causal effect of choosing only online lectures was estimated by adjusting for measured confounders using four standard methods. The four nearly identical point estimates remained positive but were small and not statistically significant at the 95% confidence level. Sensitivity analysis indicated that unmeasured confounding was unlikely to be large but might plausibly reduce the point estimate to zero. No statistically significant differences were found in preliminary comparisons of effects on females/males, U.S./non-U.S. citizens, freshmen/non-freshman, and lower-scoring/higher-scoring math ACT groups.","PeriodicalId":300288,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Technology Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Most Students Need in-Person Lectures? A Study of a Large Statistics Class\",\"authors\":\"Ellen S. Fireman, Zachary S. Donnini, M. Weissman, Daniel J. Eck\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00472395231166592\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Over 1100 students over four semesters were given the option of taking an introductory undergraduate statistics class either by in-person attendance in lectures or by taking exactly the same class (same instructor, recorded lectures, homework, blind grading, website, etc.) without the in-person lectures. Roughly, equal numbers of students chose each option. The online students did slightly better on computer-graded exams. The causal effect of choosing only online lectures was estimated by adjusting for measured confounders using four standard methods. The four nearly identical point estimates remained positive but were small and not statistically significant at the 95% confidence level. Sensitivity analysis indicated that unmeasured confounding was unlikely to be large but might plausibly reduce the point estimate to zero. No statistically significant differences were found in preliminary comparisons of effects on females/males, U.S./non-U.S. citizens, freshmen/non-freshman, and lower-scoring/higher-scoring math ACT groups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":300288,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Educational Technology Systems\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Educational Technology Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395231166592\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational Technology Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395231166592","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在四个学期中,1100多名学生可以选择参加本科统计学入门课程,或者亲自出席讲座,或者在没有亲自授课的情况下参加完全相同的课程(相同的讲师,录音讲座,作业,盲目评分,网站等)。大致上,选择这两个选项的学生人数相等。在线学生在计算机评分考试中表现稍好。仅选择在线课程的因果效应通过使用四种标准方法调整测量的混杂因素来估计。四个几乎相同的点估计值仍然是正的,但在95%的置信水平上很小,没有统计学意义。敏感性分析表明,未测量的混杂因素不太可能很大,但可能合理地将点估计值降低到零。在对女性/男性、美国/非美国人的影响的初步比较中,没有发现统计学上的显著差异。公民,新生/非新生,以及得分较低/较高的ACT数学组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do Most Students Need in-Person Lectures? A Study of a Large Statistics Class
Over 1100 students over four semesters were given the option of taking an introductory undergraduate statistics class either by in-person attendance in lectures or by taking exactly the same class (same instructor, recorded lectures, homework, blind grading, website, etc.) without the in-person lectures. Roughly, equal numbers of students chose each option. The online students did slightly better on computer-graded exams. The causal effect of choosing only online lectures was estimated by adjusting for measured confounders using four standard methods. The four nearly identical point estimates remained positive but were small and not statistically significant at the 95% confidence level. Sensitivity analysis indicated that unmeasured confounding was unlikely to be large but might plausibly reduce the point estimate to zero. No statistically significant differences were found in preliminary comparisons of effects on females/males, U.S./non-U.S. citizens, freshmen/non-freshman, and lower-scoring/higher-scoring math ACT groups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
UX Design for Deaf Children: How is it Done Now? Should it Change? Innovative Debriefing Approach: Applying a Project Management Framework to Develop a Debriefing Communications Plan for Educational Computer-Based Simulation Games Creating a “Space In-Between”: Learning on the Physical–Hybrid–Virtual Continuum Early Perceptions of Teaching and Learning Using Generative AI in Higher Education Centering the Learner Within Instructional Design: The Evolution of Learning Design and the Emergence of Learning Experience Design (LXD) in Workforce Training and Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1