Utilidad de la línea orbitomeatal superior sin incluir los cristalinos en la exploración con diferentes voltajes del tubo en la TC craneal pediátrica

Introduction and objectives

To compare the real time skin dosimeter values at lens between with the lens included in the scan range (orbitomeatal base line [OML]) or without the lens included in the scan range (superior orbitomeatal line [SOML]) at different tube voltages.

Materials and methods

We used three pediatric anthropomorphic phantoms with a 64 detector-row computed tomography (CT) scanner with the OML- or SOML-protocol at different tube voltages during the head CT. A real time skin dosimeter was inserted into the phantom center of the head, and surfaces of the lens. We compared the real time skin dosimeter values at lens between the OML- and SOML-protocol.

Results

There were no significant differences in the real time skin dosimeter values for the head in the scan area for each phantom at different tube voltages between the OML- and SOML-protocol (P > .05 for all phantom). Compared with the OML protocol, it is possible to reduce the real time skin dosimeter values at lens by approximately 80% by using the SOML protocol (P < .05) at all tube voltages. Compared with the OML protocol, it is possible to reduce the real time skin dosimeter values at mammary gland by approximately 20% by using the SOML protocol (P < .05) at all tube voltages.

Conclusions

During the pediatric head CT examination, SOML protocol was possible to reduce the real time skin dosimeter values at lens by approximately 80% compared with OML protocol at all tube voltages.