捷克共和国更广阔视野下的征收

Michal Radvan, J. Neckář
{"title":"捷克共和国更广阔视野下的征收","authors":"Michal Radvan, J. Neckář","doi":"10.1201/9781315749167-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Expropriation is a legal institute, which uses the power of law\nto make changes in property rights. The aim of this institute\nis to facilitate the transition to desirable outcomes or to\nimpose restrictions to achieve similar ends in relation to the\nexisting property rights which would not be possible without\nthis institute. This chapter focuses on a range of contemporary\nissues, problems, experiences and commentaries in the Czech\nRepublic in the area of expropriation (including general\nexpropriation rules, the public interest definition,\ndetermination of the purpose of expropriation according to\nindividual laws, the time aspect of expropriation, the Material\nIntention of the Act on Line Transport Constructions,\ncompensations for expropriation and tax impacts, and\ninternational arbitration with foreign investors as a result of\nexpropriation). Including the outcome of case law improves the\nunderstanding and interpretation of the expropriation\ninstitute. At the end, the chapter offers potential solutions\nto the issues covered. It works with the hypothesis that the\nregulation de lege lata is sufficient and there is no need for\namendments. To confirm or disprove this hypothesis is the main\naim of the chapter. Concerning the scientific methods,\ndescription is used to introduce the legal regulation, analysis\nto conclude the pros and cons of the existing regulation and\ncase law, and comparison and synthesis to summarise gained\nknowledge and the present regulation de lege ferenda. The\nprofessional literature on the expropriation issues within the\nCzech Republic is limited, and it has been necessary to work\nwith sources for which expropriation is of marginal relevance\nonly. The only exemption to this is the chapter in the book\nwritten by Průcha and Neckař (2008).","PeriodicalId":168180,"journal":{"name":"Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Issues in Expropriation","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expropriation from the wider perspective in the Czech Republic\",\"authors\":\"Michal Radvan, J. Neckář\",\"doi\":\"10.1201/9781315749167-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Expropriation is a legal institute, which uses the power of law\\nto make changes in property rights. The aim of this institute\\nis to facilitate the transition to desirable outcomes or to\\nimpose restrictions to achieve similar ends in relation to the\\nexisting property rights which would not be possible without\\nthis institute. This chapter focuses on a range of contemporary\\nissues, problems, experiences and commentaries in the Czech\\nRepublic in the area of expropriation (including general\\nexpropriation rules, the public interest definition,\\ndetermination of the purpose of expropriation according to\\nindividual laws, the time aspect of expropriation, the Material\\nIntention of the Act on Line Transport Constructions,\\ncompensations for expropriation and tax impacts, and\\ninternational arbitration with foreign investors as a result of\\nexpropriation). Including the outcome of case law improves the\\nunderstanding and interpretation of the expropriation\\ninstitute. At the end, the chapter offers potential solutions\\nto the issues covered. It works with the hypothesis that the\\nregulation de lege lata is sufficient and there is no need for\\namendments. To confirm or disprove this hypothesis is the main\\naim of the chapter. Concerning the scientific methods,\\ndescription is used to introduce the legal regulation, analysis\\nto conclude the pros and cons of the existing regulation and\\ncase law, and comparison and synthesis to summarise gained\\nknowledge and the present regulation de lege ferenda. The\\nprofessional literature on the expropriation issues within the\\nCzech Republic is limited, and it has been necessary to work\\nwith sources for which expropriation is of marginal relevance\\nonly. The only exemption to this is the chapter in the book\\nwritten by Průcha and Neckař (2008).\",\"PeriodicalId\":168180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Issues in Expropriation\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Issues in Expropriation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315749167-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Issues in Expropriation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315749167-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

征用是一种法律制度,利用法律的力量对产权进行变更。该机构的目的是促进向理想结果的过渡,或对现有产权实施限制,以达到类似的目的,如果没有该机构,这些目的是不可能实现的。本章集中讨论了捷克共和国在征收领域的一系列当代问题、问题、经验和评论(包括一般征收规则、公共利益的定义、根据个别法律确定征收目的、征收的时间方面、《线路运输建设法》的实质意图、征收补偿和税收影响。以及因征用而与外国投资者进行国际仲裁)。包括判例法的结果,提高了对征收制度的认识和解释。最后,本章为所涉及的问题提供了潜在的解决方案。它的假设是,法律法规是充分的,不需要修改。证实或反驳这一假设是本章的主要内容。在科学的方法上,通过描述来介绍法律法规,通过分析来总结现有法规和判例法的优缺点,通过比较和综合来总结所获得的知识和目前的法律法规。关于捷克共和国征收问题的专业文献是有限的,并且有必要与征收仅具有边缘相关性的来源合作。唯一的例外是Průcha和neckazov(2008)撰写的书中的章节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Expropriation from the wider perspective in the Czech Republic
Expropriation is a legal institute, which uses the power of law to make changes in property rights. The aim of this institute is to facilitate the transition to desirable outcomes or to impose restrictions to achieve similar ends in relation to the existing property rights which would not be possible without this institute. This chapter focuses on a range of contemporary issues, problems, experiences and commentaries in the Czech Republic in the area of expropriation (including general expropriation rules, the public interest definition, determination of the purpose of expropriation according to individual laws, the time aspect of expropriation, the Material Intention of the Act on Line Transport Constructions, compensations for expropriation and tax impacts, and international arbitration with foreign investors as a result of expropriation). Including the outcome of case law improves the understanding and interpretation of the expropriation institute. At the end, the chapter offers potential solutions to the issues covered. It works with the hypothesis that the regulation de lege lata is sufficient and there is no need for amendments. To confirm or disprove this hypothesis is the main aim of the chapter. Concerning the scientific methods, description is used to introduce the legal regulation, analysis to conclude the pros and cons of the existing regulation and case law, and comparison and synthesis to summarise gained knowledge and the present regulation de lege ferenda. The professional literature on the expropriation issues within the Czech Republic is limited, and it has been necessary to work with sources for which expropriation is of marginal relevance only. The only exemption to this is the chapter in the book written by Průcha and Neckař (2008).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Across Asia, if done on the cheap Compulsory land acquisition in Malaysia The impacts of land acquisition and resettlement activities of infrastructure investments on natural and cultural heritage and social and economic life Compulsory purchase in developing countries Reinventing land readjustment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1