Edlainny Araujo Ribeiro, Geórgia Miranda Tomich, Brena de Almeida Costa, Rodrigo Alves de Oliveira, Lorrany Karen Batista de Jesus
{"title":"无乳链球菌:巴西亚马逊地区医院高危孕妇的定植和抗菌药物敏感性概况","authors":"Edlainny Araujo Ribeiro, Geórgia Miranda Tomich, Brena de Almeida Costa, Rodrigo Alves de Oliveira, Lorrany Karen Batista de Jesus","doi":"10.5123/s2176-6223202100542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT \n \nINTRODUCTION: \nGroup B streptococcus (GBS) or Streptococcus agalactiae in immunosuppressed individuals, such as neonates, can result in a series of complications and diseases, which can even lead to death. \n \n \nOBJECTIVES: \nTo characterize the clinical-epidemiological profile of pregnant women colonized by S. agalactiae and determine the isolates' sensitivity profile in a hospital in the Amazon. \n \n \nMATERIALS AND METHODS: \nClinical specimens were collected from March 15 to April 15, 2019, following the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines. The phenotypic identification was performed according to the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa), and for the antimicrobial sensitivity testing, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute specifications were followed. \n \n \nRESULTS: \nColonization by GBS was found in 34.0% of the pregnant women; the most frequent chronic diseases were hypertension (26.0%) and diabetes (10.0%). The antimicrobials linezolid, vancomycin, and meropenem were the most effective against the bacteria. There was a high resistance rate for ciprofloxacin (82.4%) and chloramphenicol (70.6%); 88.2% of the strains analyzed were multidrug-resistant. \n \n \nCONCLUSION: \nThe presence of GBS among high-risk pregnant women and the detection of multidrug-resistant strains, including those with resistance to penicillins and cephalosporins, bring up the importance of screening for the detection of this bacteria during pregnancy and the beginning of antibiotic prophylaxis, emphasizing the need to adapt the practice of local prenatal care to the current recommendations.","PeriodicalId":285768,"journal":{"name":"Revista Pan-Amazônica de Saúde","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Streptococcus agalactiae: colonização de gestantes de alto risco em um hospital regional da Amazônia brasileira e perfil de sensibilidade aos antimicrobianos\",\"authors\":\"Edlainny Araujo Ribeiro, Geórgia Miranda Tomich, Brena de Almeida Costa, Rodrigo Alves de Oliveira, Lorrany Karen Batista de Jesus\",\"doi\":\"10.5123/s2176-6223202100542\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT \\n \\nINTRODUCTION: \\nGroup B streptococcus (GBS) or Streptococcus agalactiae in immunosuppressed individuals, such as neonates, can result in a series of complications and diseases, which can even lead to death. \\n \\n \\nOBJECTIVES: \\nTo characterize the clinical-epidemiological profile of pregnant women colonized by S. agalactiae and determine the isolates' sensitivity profile in a hospital in the Amazon. \\n \\n \\nMATERIALS AND METHODS: \\nClinical specimens were collected from March 15 to April 15, 2019, following the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines. The phenotypic identification was performed according to the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa), and for the antimicrobial sensitivity testing, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute specifications were followed. \\n \\n \\nRESULTS: \\nColonization by GBS was found in 34.0% of the pregnant women; the most frequent chronic diseases were hypertension (26.0%) and diabetes (10.0%). The antimicrobials linezolid, vancomycin, and meropenem were the most effective against the bacteria. There was a high resistance rate for ciprofloxacin (82.4%) and chloramphenicol (70.6%); 88.2% of the strains analyzed were multidrug-resistant. \\n \\n \\nCONCLUSION: \\nThe presence of GBS among high-risk pregnant women and the detection of multidrug-resistant strains, including those with resistance to penicillins and cephalosporins, bring up the importance of screening for the detection of this bacteria during pregnancy and the beginning of antibiotic prophylaxis, emphasizing the need to adapt the practice of local prenatal care to the current recommendations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":285768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Pan-Amazônica de Saúde\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Pan-Amazônica de Saúde\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5123/s2176-6223202100542\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Pan-Amazônica de Saúde","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5123/s2176-6223202100542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Streptococcus agalactiae: colonização de gestantes de alto risco em um hospital regional da Amazônia brasileira e perfil de sensibilidade aos antimicrobianos
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION:
Group B streptococcus (GBS) or Streptococcus agalactiae in immunosuppressed individuals, such as neonates, can result in a series of complications and diseases, which can even lead to death.
OBJECTIVES:
To characterize the clinical-epidemiological profile of pregnant women colonized by S. agalactiae and determine the isolates' sensitivity profile in a hospital in the Amazon.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Clinical specimens were collected from March 15 to April 15, 2019, following the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines. The phenotypic identification was performed according to the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa), and for the antimicrobial sensitivity testing, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute specifications were followed.
RESULTS:
Colonization by GBS was found in 34.0% of the pregnant women; the most frequent chronic diseases were hypertension (26.0%) and diabetes (10.0%). The antimicrobials linezolid, vancomycin, and meropenem were the most effective against the bacteria. There was a high resistance rate for ciprofloxacin (82.4%) and chloramphenicol (70.6%); 88.2% of the strains analyzed were multidrug-resistant.
CONCLUSION:
The presence of GBS among high-risk pregnant women and the detection of multidrug-resistant strains, including those with resistance to penicillins and cephalosporins, bring up the importance of screening for the detection of this bacteria during pregnancy and the beginning of antibiotic prophylaxis, emphasizing the need to adapt the practice of local prenatal care to the current recommendations.