{"title":"对丹尼尔·加伯的回答，动力学的形而上学问题","authors":"Anne-Lise Rey","doi":"10.5347/01856383.0138.000302707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This text is an answer to Daniel Garber’s article. In the reply, I challenge the idea that the dynamics is a parallel project, incompatible with the monadological project. To criticize this position, I present the importance of the conceptualization of action from Dynamica de potentia (1690) and its implications for the monadological metaphysics itself.\n","PeriodicalId":351122,"journal":{"name":"Estudios: filosofía, historia, letras","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Respuesta a Daniel Garber, Las cuestiones metafísicas de la dinámica\",\"authors\":\"Anne-Lise Rey\",\"doi\":\"10.5347/01856383.0138.000302707\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This text is an answer to Daniel Garber’s article. In the reply, I challenge the idea that the dynamics is a parallel project, incompatible with the monadological project. To criticize this position, I present the importance of the conceptualization of action from Dynamica de potentia (1690) and its implications for the monadological metaphysics itself.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":351122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Estudios: filosofía, historia, letras\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Estudios: filosofía, historia, letras\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5347/01856383.0138.000302707\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estudios: filosofía, historia, letras","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5347/01856383.0138.000302707","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Respuesta a Daniel Garber, Las cuestiones metafísicas de la dinámica
This text is an answer to Daniel Garber’s article. In the reply, I challenge the idea that the dynamics is a parallel project, incompatible with the monadological project. To criticize this position, I present the importance of the conceptualization of action from Dynamica de potentia (1690) and its implications for the monadological metaphysics itself.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
