基于主要发现的临床病例报告检索的多样化

Mengqi Luo, Fengchang Yu, Haihua Chen
{"title":"基于主要发现的临床病例报告检索的多样化","authors":"Mengqi Luo, Fengchang Yu, Haihua Chen","doi":"10.1109/QRS-C51114.2020.00044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clinical case reports are the ‘eyewitness’ in biomedical literature and provide a valuable, unique, albeit noisy and underutilized type of evidence. Main finding is the reason for writing up the reports. Main finding based case reports retrieval provides way for user to conveniently access information of eyewitness evidence. However, user retrieval requirements are often ambiguous and diverse, traditional similarity based retrieval mechanism cannot meet different needs of users. Here, we conduct research of result diversification in case reports retrieval based on main finding. First, four similarity measurements for comparing main finding contents are used for initial result ranking; second, two implicit reranking algorithms and two explicit reranking algorithms are applied for result diversification. Experimental result showed that the methods we used had improved sub-topics coverage rate (CR@ X%) in re-ranking result, which proved the effectiveness of our research work for improving result diversification degree.","PeriodicalId":358174,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE 20th International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security Companion (QRS-C)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Result Diversification in Clinical Case Reports Retrieval based on Main Finding\",\"authors\":\"Mengqi Luo, Fengchang Yu, Haihua Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/QRS-C51114.2020.00044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Clinical case reports are the ‘eyewitness’ in biomedical literature and provide a valuable, unique, albeit noisy and underutilized type of evidence. Main finding is the reason for writing up the reports. Main finding based case reports retrieval provides way for user to conveniently access information of eyewitness evidence. However, user retrieval requirements are often ambiguous and diverse, traditional similarity based retrieval mechanism cannot meet different needs of users. Here, we conduct research of result diversification in case reports retrieval based on main finding. First, four similarity measurements for comparing main finding contents are used for initial result ranking; second, two implicit reranking algorithms and two explicit reranking algorithms are applied for result diversification. Experimental result showed that the methods we used had improved sub-topics coverage rate (CR@ X%) in re-ranking result, which proved the effectiveness of our research work for improving result diversification degree.\",\"PeriodicalId\":358174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE 20th International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security Companion (QRS-C)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE 20th International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security Companion (QRS-C)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/QRS-C51114.2020.00044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE 20th International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security Companion (QRS-C)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/QRS-C51114.2020.00044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

临床病例报告是生物医学文献中的“目击者”,提供了一种有价值的、独特的、尽管嘈杂且未充分利用的证据。主要发现是撰写这些报告的原因。基于主查找的案件报告检索为用户方便地获取目击证据信息提供了途径。然而,用户的检索需求往往是模糊和多样的,传统的基于相似度的检索机制不能满足用户的不同需求。本文对基于主要发现的病例报告检索结果多样化进行了研究。首先,采用比较主要查找内容的四种相似度度量进行初步结果排序;其次,采用两种隐式重排序算法和两种显式重排序算法实现结果多样化。实验结果表明,我们使用的方法在重新排序结果中提高了子主题覆盖率(CR@ X%),证明了我们的研究工作在提高结果多样化程度方面的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Result Diversification in Clinical Case Reports Retrieval based on Main Finding
Clinical case reports are the ‘eyewitness’ in biomedical literature and provide a valuable, unique, albeit noisy and underutilized type of evidence. Main finding is the reason for writing up the reports. Main finding based case reports retrieval provides way for user to conveniently access information of eyewitness evidence. However, user retrieval requirements are often ambiguous and diverse, traditional similarity based retrieval mechanism cannot meet different needs of users. Here, we conduct research of result diversification in case reports retrieval based on main finding. First, four similarity measurements for comparing main finding contents are used for initial result ranking; second, two implicit reranking algorithms and two explicit reranking algorithms are applied for result diversification. Experimental result showed that the methods we used had improved sub-topics coverage rate (CR@ X%) in re-ranking result, which proved the effectiveness of our research work for improving result diversification degree.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Decomposition of Attributes Oriented Software Trustworthiness Measure Based on Axiomatic Approaches A Model-based RCM Analysis Method A Threat Analysis Methodology for Security Requirements Elicitation in Machine Learning Based Systems Timely Publication of Transaction Records in a Private Blockchain Organizing Committee QRS 2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1