轮辐式卡特尔与RPM:损害理论的差异、互动与共识

Lucas de Carvalho Silveira Bueno
{"title":"轮辐式卡特尔与RPM:损害理论的差异、互动与共识","authors":"Lucas de Carvalho Silveira Bueno","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3732767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wholesale-retail hub and spoke cartels usually combine a horizontal collusive behaviour between competitors and the involvement of at least one hub, who operates at a different level of the supply chain and facilitates the collusion, and some forms of vertical restraints, typically RPM or, in the context of e-commerce, broad RPMFN or even pricing algorithms. There are different economic theories to explain why the hub would accept the risk of facilitating or even promoting the collusion, and the economic literature has already shown that the referred vertical restraints can have horizontal effects which are very similar to a horizontal collusion, resulting in a difficulty for competition authorities to differentiate one conduct from the other. The ultimate scope of this dissertation is to identify the differences and interactions between RPM and hub and spoke cartels and, by analysing the current international enforcement activities against hub and spoke cartels, this dissertation proposes a single effective theory of harm for competition authorities to differentiate a hub and spoke cartel from the unilateral vertical anti-competitive conduct.","PeriodicalId":150569,"journal":{"name":"IO: Theory eJournal","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hub and Spoke Cartels vs. RPM: Differences, Interactions and the Concurrence of Wills’ Theory of Harm\",\"authors\":\"Lucas de Carvalho Silveira Bueno\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3732767\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Wholesale-retail hub and spoke cartels usually combine a horizontal collusive behaviour between competitors and the involvement of at least one hub, who operates at a different level of the supply chain and facilitates the collusion, and some forms of vertical restraints, typically RPM or, in the context of e-commerce, broad RPMFN or even pricing algorithms. There are different economic theories to explain why the hub would accept the risk of facilitating or even promoting the collusion, and the economic literature has already shown that the referred vertical restraints can have horizontal effects which are very similar to a horizontal collusion, resulting in a difficulty for competition authorities to differentiate one conduct from the other. The ultimate scope of this dissertation is to identify the differences and interactions between RPM and hub and spoke cartels and, by analysing the current international enforcement activities against hub and spoke cartels, this dissertation proposes a single effective theory of harm for competition authorities to differentiate a hub and spoke cartel from the unilateral vertical anti-competitive conduct.\",\"PeriodicalId\":150569,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IO: Theory eJournal\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IO: Theory eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3732767\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IO: Theory eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3732767","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

批发-零售枢纽和轮辐卡特尔通常结合了竞争者之间的横向串通行为和至少一个枢纽的参与,该枢纽在供应链的不同层次上运作并促进了串通,以及某些形式的垂直限制,通常是RPM,或者在电子商务背景下,广泛的RPMFN甚至定价算法。有不同的经济理论来解释为什么枢纽会接受促进甚至促进共谋的风险,经济学文献已经表明,所提到的垂直限制可以产生水平效应,这与水平共谋非常相似,导致竞争当局难以区分一种行为与另一种行为。本文的最终范围是确定RPM与轮辐式卡特尔之间的差异和相互作用,并通过分析当前针对轮辐式卡特尔的国际执法活动,为竞争当局区分轮辐式卡特尔与单方面垂直反竞争行为提出了一种单一有效的伤害理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hub and Spoke Cartels vs. RPM: Differences, Interactions and the Concurrence of Wills’ Theory of Harm
Wholesale-retail hub and spoke cartels usually combine a horizontal collusive behaviour between competitors and the involvement of at least one hub, who operates at a different level of the supply chain and facilitates the collusion, and some forms of vertical restraints, typically RPM or, in the context of e-commerce, broad RPMFN or even pricing algorithms. There are different economic theories to explain why the hub would accept the risk of facilitating or even promoting the collusion, and the economic literature has already shown that the referred vertical restraints can have horizontal effects which are very similar to a horizontal collusion, resulting in a difficulty for competition authorities to differentiate one conduct from the other. The ultimate scope of this dissertation is to identify the differences and interactions between RPM and hub and spoke cartels and, by analysing the current international enforcement activities against hub and spoke cartels, this dissertation proposes a single effective theory of harm for competition authorities to differentiate a hub and spoke cartel from the unilateral vertical anti-competitive conduct.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Gainers and Losers from Market Integration Price Authority under Competing Organizations Cash Hedging Motivates Information Sharing in Supply Chains Platform Competition and Interoperability: The Net Fee Model Risks and Global Supply Chains: What We Know and What We Need to Know
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1