有效的动物保护

Jeff Sebo
{"title":"有效的动物保护","authors":"Jeff Sebo","doi":"10.4324/9781315105840-48","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Effective animal advocates attempt to use evidence and reason to do the most good possible in animal advocacy. In this course we examine this approach to animal advocacy from theoretical as well as practical perspectives. First, what does it mean to do the most good possible, and how do effective animal advocates attempt to pursue this aim? Second, what are the main theoretical objections to effective animal advocacy? For example, does it involve too much cluelessness, demandingness, or implausibility? Third, what are the main practical objections to effective animal advocacy? For example, does it focus too much on direct, short-term, individual change and not enough on indirect, long-term, structural change? Along the way we will consider broader moral and political questions related to effective animal advocacy.","PeriodicalId":177384,"journal":{"name":"The Routledge Handbook of Animal Ethics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effective Animal Advocacy\",\"authors\":\"Jeff Sebo\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781315105840-48\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Effective animal advocates attempt to use evidence and reason to do the most good possible in animal advocacy. In this course we examine this approach to animal advocacy from theoretical as well as practical perspectives. First, what does it mean to do the most good possible, and how do effective animal advocates attempt to pursue this aim? Second, what are the main theoretical objections to effective animal advocacy? For example, does it involve too much cluelessness, demandingness, or implausibility? Third, what are the main practical objections to effective animal advocacy? For example, does it focus too much on direct, short-term, individual change and not enough on indirect, long-term, structural change? Along the way we will consider broader moral and political questions related to effective animal advocacy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":177384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Routledge Handbook of Animal Ethics\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Routledge Handbook of Animal Ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315105840-48\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Routledge Handbook of Animal Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315105840-48","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有效的动物倡导者试图利用证据和理性在动物保护方面做得最好。在这门课程中,我们将从理论和实践的角度来研究这种保护动物的方法。首先,什么是“尽可能做好事”?有效的动物保护者如何努力实现这一目标?其次,对有效的动物保护的主要理论异议是什么?例如,它是否包含太多的无知、要求或不可信?第三,对有效的动物保护的主要实际反对意见是什么?例如,它是否过于关注直接的、短期的、个人的变化,而对间接的、长期的、结构性的变化关注不够?在此过程中,我们将考虑与有效的动物保护有关的更广泛的道德和政治问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effective Animal Advocacy
Effective animal advocates attempt to use evidence and reason to do the most good possible in animal advocacy. In this course we examine this approach to animal advocacy from theoretical as well as practical perspectives. First, what does it mean to do the most good possible, and how do effective animal advocates attempt to pursue this aim? Second, what are the main theoretical objections to effective animal advocacy? For example, does it involve too much cluelessness, demandingness, or implausibility? Third, what are the main practical objections to effective animal advocacy? For example, does it focus too much on direct, short-term, individual change and not enough on indirect, long-term, structural change? Along the way we will consider broader moral and political questions related to effective animal advocacy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Intensive Animal Agriculture and Human Health The Moral Animal Subsistence Hunting Seafood Ethics Animal Models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1