用瞳孔活动和眼球运动测量阅读时的认知努力:接受和未接受初级音乐教育儿童的纵向比较

Agata Rodziewicz-Cybulska, Krzysztof Krejtz, A. Duchowski, I. Krejtz
{"title":"用瞳孔活动和眼球运动测量阅读时的认知努力:接受和未接受初级音乐教育儿童的纵向比较","authors":"Agata Rodziewicz-Cybulska, Krzysztof Krejtz, A. Duchowski, I. Krejtz","doi":"10.1145/3517031.3529636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article evaluates the Low/High Index of Pupillary Activity (LHIPA), a measure of cognitive effort based on pupil response, in the context of reading. At the beginning of 2nd and 3rd grade, 107 children (8-9 y.o.) from music and general primary school were asked to read 40 sentences with keywords differing in length and frequency while their eye movements were recorded. Sentences with low frequency or long keywords received more attention than sentences with high frequent or short keywords. The word frequency and length effects were more pronounced in younger children. At the 2nd grade, music children dwelt less on sentences with short frequent keywords than on sentences with long frequent keywords. As expected LHIPA decreased over sentences with low frequency short keywords suggesting more cognitive effort at earlier stages of reading ability. This finding shows the utility of LHIPA as a measure of cognitive effort in education.","PeriodicalId":339393,"journal":{"name":"2022 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring Cognitive Effort with Pupillary Activity and Fixational Eye Movements When Reading: Longitudinal Comparison of Children With and Without Primary Music Education\",\"authors\":\"Agata Rodziewicz-Cybulska, Krzysztof Krejtz, A. Duchowski, I. Krejtz\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3517031.3529636\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article evaluates the Low/High Index of Pupillary Activity (LHIPA), a measure of cognitive effort based on pupil response, in the context of reading. At the beginning of 2nd and 3rd grade, 107 children (8-9 y.o.) from music and general primary school were asked to read 40 sentences with keywords differing in length and frequency while their eye movements were recorded. Sentences with low frequency or long keywords received more attention than sentences with high frequent or short keywords. The word frequency and length effects were more pronounced in younger children. At the 2nd grade, music children dwelt less on sentences with short frequent keywords than on sentences with long frequent keywords. As expected LHIPA decreased over sentences with low frequency short keywords suggesting more cognitive effort at earlier stages of reading ability. This finding shows the utility of LHIPA as a measure of cognitive effort in education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":339393,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3517031.3529636\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3517031.3529636","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文评估了瞳孔活动低/高指数(LHIPA),一种基于瞳孔反应的认知努力测量,在阅读的背景下。在二年级和三年级开始时,来自音乐和普通小学的107名儿童(8-9岁)被要求阅读40个长度和频率不同的关键词句子,同时记录他们的眼球运动。低频率或长关键词的句子比高频率或短关键词的句子更受关注。单词频率和长度的影响在年龄较小的儿童中更为明显。在二年级时,音乐儿童较少关注短关键词的句子,而较少关注长关键词的句子。正如预期的那样,LHIPA在低频率短关键词的句子中下降,表明在阅读能力的早期阶段需要更多的认知努力。这一发现显示了LHIPA作为教育中认知努力的衡量标准的效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Measuring Cognitive Effort with Pupillary Activity and Fixational Eye Movements When Reading: Longitudinal Comparison of Children With and Without Primary Music Education
This article evaluates the Low/High Index of Pupillary Activity (LHIPA), a measure of cognitive effort based on pupil response, in the context of reading. At the beginning of 2nd and 3rd grade, 107 children (8-9 y.o.) from music and general primary school were asked to read 40 sentences with keywords differing in length and frequency while their eye movements were recorded. Sentences with low frequency or long keywords received more attention than sentences with high frequent or short keywords. The word frequency and length effects were more pronounced in younger children. At the 2nd grade, music children dwelt less on sentences with short frequent keywords than on sentences with long frequent keywords. As expected LHIPA decreased over sentences with low frequency short keywords suggesting more cognitive effort at earlier stages of reading ability. This finding shows the utility of LHIPA as a measure of cognitive effort in education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SynchronEyes: A Novel, Paired Data Set of Eye Movements Recorded Simultaneously with Remote and Wearable Eye-Tracking Devices Advancing dignity for adaptive wheelchair users via a hybrid eye tracking and electromyography training game Scanpath Comparison using ScanGraph for Education and Learning Purposes: Summary of previous educational studies performed with the use of ScanGraph Poster: A Preliminary Investigation on Eye Gaze-based Concentration Recognition during Silent Reading of Text Predicting Decision-Making during an Intelligence Test via Semantic Scanpath Comparisons
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1