宗教婚姻和同居:解读差异

Cohabitation and Religious Marriage Pub Date : 2020-01-15 DOI:10.46692/9781529210842.006

Rajnaara C. Akhtar

{"title":"宗教婚姻和同居:解读差异","authors":"Rajnaara C. Akhtar","doi":"10.46692/9781529210842.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter explores the similar legal outcomes faced by cohabitants and those in religious-only marriages. It argues that law reform recommendations which focus solely on religious-only marriages while ignoring the often-identical outcome for cohabitees are erroneous, and that law reform providing legal rights for cohabitees will protect both types of families.","PeriodicalId":279989,"journal":{"name":"Cohabitation and Religious Marriage","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Religious-Only Marriages and Cohabitation: Deciphering Differences\",\"authors\":\"Rajnaara C. Akhtar\",\"doi\":\"10.46692/9781529210842.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter explores the similar legal outcomes faced by cohabitants and those in religious-only marriages. It argues that law reform recommendations which focus solely on religious-only marriages while ignoring the often-identical outcome for cohabitees are erroneous, and that law reform providing legal rights for cohabitees will protect both types of families.\",\"PeriodicalId\":279989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cohabitation and Religious Marriage\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cohabitation and Religious Marriage\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46692/9781529210842.006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cohabitation and Religious Marriage","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46692/9781529210842.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

本章探讨了同居者和宗教婚姻者所面临的类似法律结果。它认为，法律改革建议只关注宗教婚姻，而忽视了同居者往往相同的结果，这是错误的，为同居者提供合法权利的法律改革将保护这两种类型的家庭。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Religious-Only Marriages and Cohabitation: Deciphering Differences

This chapter explores the similar legal outcomes faced by cohabitants and those in religious-only marriages. It argues that law reform recommendations which focus solely on religious-only marriages while ignoring the often-identical outcome for cohabitees are erroneous, and that law reform providing legal rights for cohabitees will protect both types of families.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Cohabitation and Religious Marriage

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊最新文献

Conclusion Modern Marriage Myths: the Dichotomy Between Expectations of Legal Rationality and Lived Law Index ‘Regrettably it is not that Simple’: Religious-Only Marriages and Cohabitation: