多微网系统集中式和分散式能源管理模式的比较

2017 Smart Grid Conference (SGC) Pub Date : 2017-12-01 DOI:10.1109/SGC.2017.8308837

Farshad Khavari, A. Badri, Ali Zangeneh, M. Shafiekhani

{"title":"多微网系统集中式和分散式能源管理模式的比较","authors":"Farshad Khavari, A. Badri, Ali Zangeneh, M. Shafiekhani","doi":"10.1109/SGC.2017.8308837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Various models are proposed to manage multi-microgrid energy systems. Centralized and decentralized are two basic models, to this end. This paper compares these two energy-management models of multi-microgrid systems for day-ahead scheduling. This comparison is done for the time of calculation, the benefit of microgrids and the state of the Distributed Energy Resources(DER) in microgrids when happen predetermined islanding mode. Simulation and unit commitment is coded and solved by mixed integer programming (MIP) solver CPLEX in GAMS.","PeriodicalId":346749,"journal":{"name":"2017 Smart Grid Conference (SGC)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of centralized and decentralized energy-management models of multi-microgrid systems\",\"authors\":\"Farshad Khavari, A. Badri, Ali Zangeneh, M. Shafiekhani\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SGC.2017.8308837\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Various models are proposed to manage multi-microgrid energy systems. Centralized and decentralized are two basic models, to this end. This paper compares these two energy-management models of multi-microgrid systems for day-ahead scheduling. This comparison is done for the time of calculation, the benefit of microgrids and the state of the Distributed Energy Resources(DER) in microgrids when happen predetermined islanding mode. Simulation and unit commitment is coded and solved by mixed integer programming (MIP) solver CPLEX in GAMS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":346749,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 Smart Grid Conference (SGC)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 Smart Grid Conference (SGC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SGC.2017.8308837\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 Smart Grid Conference (SGC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SGC.2017.8308837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 14

摘要

提出了多种模型来管理多微网能源系统。为此，中心化和去中心化是两种基本模式。本文比较了这两种多微网系统日前调度的能量管理模型。对计算时间、微电网效益以及微电网在发生预定孤岛模式时的分布式能源状态进行了比较。采用GAMS中的混合整数规划(MIP)求解器CPLEX对仿真和单元承诺进行编码和求解。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

A comparison of centralized and decentralized energy-management models of multi-microgrid systems

Various models are proposed to manage multi-microgrid energy systems. Centralized and decentralized are two basic models, to this end. This paper compares these two energy-management models of multi-microgrid systems for day-ahead scheduling. This comparison is done for the time of calculation, the benefit of microgrids and the state of the Distributed Energy Resources(DER) in microgrids when happen predetermined islanding mode. Simulation and unit commitment is coded and solved by mixed integer programming (MIP) solver CPLEX in GAMS.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

2017 Smart Grid Conference (SGC)

自引率

0.00%

发文量