应用行动后审查来检查住院治疗方案对COVID - 19的反应

Bo Kim, B. A. Petrakis, D. McInnes, A. Gifford, S. Sliwinski, D. Smelson
{"title":"应用行动后审查来检查住院治疗方案对COVID - 19的反应","authors":"Bo Kim, B. A. Petrakis, D. McInnes, A. Gifford, S. Sliwinski, D. Smelson","doi":"10.1002/hpm.3475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Resurgences of COVID‐19 cases are a grave public health concern. Hence, there is an urgent need for health care systems to rapidly and systematically learn from their responses to earlier waves of COVID‐19. To meet this need, this article delineates how we adapted the World Health Organization's After Action Review (AAR) framework to use within our health care system of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs. An AAR is a structured, methodical evaluation of actions taken in response to an event (e.g., recent waves of COVID‐19). It delivers an actionable report regarding (i) what was expected, (ii) what actually happened, (iii) what went well, and (iv) what could have been done differently, and thus what changes are needed for future situations. We share as an example our examination of Mental Health Residential Rehabilitation and Treatment Programs in Massachusetts (a COVID‐19 hotspot). Our work can be further adapted, beyond residential treatment, as a consistent framework for reviewing COVID‐19 responses across multiple health care programs. This will identify both standardized and tailored preparations that the programs can make for future waves of the pandemic. Given the expected resurgences of COVID‐19 cases, the time to apply AAR is now.","PeriodicalId":250539,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of health planning and management","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applying after action review to examine residential treatment programs' responses to COVID‐19\",\"authors\":\"Bo Kim, B. A. Petrakis, D. McInnes, A. Gifford, S. Sliwinski, D. Smelson\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hpm.3475\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Resurgences of COVID‐19 cases are a grave public health concern. Hence, there is an urgent need for health care systems to rapidly and systematically learn from their responses to earlier waves of COVID‐19. To meet this need, this article delineates how we adapted the World Health Organization's After Action Review (AAR) framework to use within our health care system of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs. An AAR is a structured, methodical evaluation of actions taken in response to an event (e.g., recent waves of COVID‐19). It delivers an actionable report regarding (i) what was expected, (ii) what actually happened, (iii) what went well, and (iv) what could have been done differently, and thus what changes are needed for future situations. We share as an example our examination of Mental Health Residential Rehabilitation and Treatment Programs in Massachusetts (a COVID‐19 hotspot). Our work can be further adapted, beyond residential treatment, as a consistent framework for reviewing COVID‐19 responses across multiple health care programs. This will identify both standardized and tailored preparations that the programs can make for future waves of the pandemic. Given the expected resurgences of COVID‐19 cases, the time to apply AAR is now.\",\"PeriodicalId\":250539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International journal of health planning and management\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International journal of health planning and management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3475\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of health planning and management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3475","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

COVID - 19病例的再次出现是一个严重的公共卫生问题。因此,卫生保健系统迫切需要迅速和系统地从其对早期COVID - 19疫情的应对中吸取教训。为了满足这一需求,本文描述了我们如何在美国退伍军人事务部的医疗保健系统中采用世界卫生组织的行动后审查(AAR)框架。AAR是对应对某一事件(例如,最近的COVID - 19疫情)所采取的行动进行的结构化、有条不紊的评估。它提供了一份可操作的报告,内容包括(i)预期的情况,(ii)实际发生的情况,(iii)进展顺利的情况,(iv)本来可以做得不同的情况,以及未来需要做出哪些改变。我们以马萨诸塞州(COVID - 19热点)的心理健康住院康复和治疗项目为例进行了研究。除了住院治疗之外,我们的工作还可以进一步调整,作为审查多个卫生保健计划中COVID - 19应对措施的一致框架。这将确定这些规划可为未来的大流行浪潮所做的标准化和量身定制的准备工作。鉴于预计COVID - 19病例将再次出现,现在是应用AAR的时候了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Applying after action review to examine residential treatment programs' responses to COVID‐19
Abstract Resurgences of COVID‐19 cases are a grave public health concern. Hence, there is an urgent need for health care systems to rapidly and systematically learn from their responses to earlier waves of COVID‐19. To meet this need, this article delineates how we adapted the World Health Organization's After Action Review (AAR) framework to use within our health care system of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs. An AAR is a structured, methodical evaluation of actions taken in response to an event (e.g., recent waves of COVID‐19). It delivers an actionable report regarding (i) what was expected, (ii) what actually happened, (iii) what went well, and (iv) what could have been done differently, and thus what changes are needed for future situations. We share as an example our examination of Mental Health Residential Rehabilitation and Treatment Programs in Massachusetts (a COVID‐19 hotspot). Our work can be further adapted, beyond residential treatment, as a consistent framework for reviewing COVID‐19 responses across multiple health care programs. This will identify both standardized and tailored preparations that the programs can make for future waves of the pandemic. Given the expected resurgences of COVID‐19 cases, the time to apply AAR is now.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
COVID-19 vaccine wastage in Africa: A case of Nigeria. Financial issues in times of a COVID-19 pandemic in a tertiary hospital in Mali. Improving access to maternal care in Africa through telemedicine and digital health. Foresight study on online health community: The perspective of knowledge empowerment for patients with chronic diseases. Evaluation of supply sustainability of vaccine alternatives with multi-criteria decision-making methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1