描述云服务的服务水平目标:现实与神话

Jianru Ding, Ruiqi Cao, Indrajeet Saravanan, Nathaniel Morris, Christopher Stewart
{"title":"描述云服务的服务水平目标:现实与神话","authors":"Jianru Ding, Ruiqi Cao, Indrajeet Saravanan, Nathaniel Morris, Christopher Stewart","doi":"10.1109/ICAC.2019.00032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Service level objectives (SLOs) stipulate performance goals for cloud applications, microservices, and infrastructure. SLOs are widely used, in part, because system managers can tailor goals to their products, companies, and workloads. Systems research intended to support strong SLOs should target realistic performance goals used by system managers in the field. Evaluations conducted with uncommon SLO goals may not translate to real systems. Some textbooks discuss the structure of SLOs but (1) they only sketch SLO goals and (2) they use outdated examples. We mined real SLOs published on the web, extracted their goals and characterized them. Many web documents discuss SLOs loosely but few provide details and reflect real settings. Systematic literature review (SLR) prunes results and reduces bias by (1) modeling expected SLO structure and (2) detecting and removing outliers. We collected 75 SLOs where response time, query percentile and reporting period were specified. We used these SLOs to confirm and refute common perceptions. For example, we found few SLOs with response time guarantees below 10 ms for 90% or more queries. This reality bolsters perceptions that single digit SLOs face fundamental research challenges.","PeriodicalId":442645,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE International Conference on Autonomic Computing (ICAC)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterizing Service Level Objectives for Cloud Services: Realities and Myths\",\"authors\":\"Jianru Ding, Ruiqi Cao, Indrajeet Saravanan, Nathaniel Morris, Christopher Stewart\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICAC.2019.00032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Service level objectives (SLOs) stipulate performance goals for cloud applications, microservices, and infrastructure. SLOs are widely used, in part, because system managers can tailor goals to their products, companies, and workloads. Systems research intended to support strong SLOs should target realistic performance goals used by system managers in the field. Evaluations conducted with uncommon SLO goals may not translate to real systems. Some textbooks discuss the structure of SLOs but (1) they only sketch SLO goals and (2) they use outdated examples. We mined real SLOs published on the web, extracted their goals and characterized them. Many web documents discuss SLOs loosely but few provide details and reflect real settings. Systematic literature review (SLR) prunes results and reduces bias by (1) modeling expected SLO structure and (2) detecting and removing outliers. We collected 75 SLOs where response time, query percentile and reporting period were specified. We used these SLOs to confirm and refute common perceptions. For example, we found few SLOs with response time guarantees below 10 ms for 90% or more queries. This reality bolsters perceptions that single digit SLOs face fundamental research challenges.\",\"PeriodicalId\":442645,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE International Conference on Autonomic Computing (ICAC)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE International Conference on Autonomic Computing (ICAC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAC.2019.00032\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE International Conference on Autonomic Computing (ICAC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAC.2019.00032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

服务水平目标(slo)规定了云应用程序、微服务和基础设施的性能目标。slo被广泛使用,部分原因是系统管理人员可以根据他们的产品、公司和工作负载定制目标。旨在支持强大的slo的系统研究应该针对系统管理人员在该领域使用的实际性能目标。以不常见的SLO目标进行的评估可能无法转化为实际系统。一些教科书讨论了SLO的结构,但(1)他们只概述了SLO的目标,(2)他们使用过时的例子。我们挖掘了在网络上发布的真实的slo,提取了它们的目标并对其进行了描述。许多web文档松散地讨论了slo,但很少提供细节并反映实际设置。系统文献综述(SLR)通过(1)建模预期的SLO结构和(2)检测和去除异常值来修剪结果并减少偏差。我们收集了75个slo,其中指定了响应时间、查询百分位数和报告周期。我们用这些slo来证实和反驳一些普遍的看法。例如,对于90%或更多的查询,我们发现很少有响应时间保证低于10毫秒的slo。这一现实支持了个位数slo面临基础研究挑战的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Characterizing Service Level Objectives for Cloud Services: Realities and Myths
Service level objectives (SLOs) stipulate performance goals for cloud applications, microservices, and infrastructure. SLOs are widely used, in part, because system managers can tailor goals to their products, companies, and workloads. Systems research intended to support strong SLOs should target realistic performance goals used by system managers in the field. Evaluations conducted with uncommon SLO goals may not translate to real systems. Some textbooks discuss the structure of SLOs but (1) they only sketch SLO goals and (2) they use outdated examples. We mined real SLOs published on the web, extracted their goals and characterized them. Many web documents discuss SLOs loosely but few provide details and reflect real settings. Systematic literature review (SLR) prunes results and reduces bias by (1) modeling expected SLO structure and (2) detecting and removing outliers. We collected 75 SLOs where response time, query percentile and reporting period were specified. We used these SLOs to confirm and refute common perceptions. For example, we found few SLOs with response time guarantees below 10 ms for 90% or more queries. This reality bolsters perceptions that single digit SLOs face fundamental research challenges.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Chisel: Reshaping Queries to Trim Latency in Key-Value Stores GreenRoute: A Generalizable Fuel-Saving Vehicular Navigation Service Characterizing Disk Health Degradation and Proactively Protecting Against Disk Failures for Reliable Storage Systems Adaptively Accelerating Map-Reduce/Spark with GPUs: A Case Study Enhancing Learning-Enabled Software Systems to Address Environmental Uncertainty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1