保持眼科学术研究的质量和准确性:传统同行评议的重要性

Sunny Chi Lik Au
{"title":"保持眼科学术研究的质量和准确性:传统同行评议的重要性","authors":"Sunny Chi Lik Au","doi":"10.46889/joar.2023.4201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last few months, Artificial Intelligence (AI) and chatbots have gained significant attention and recognition as technological advancements that could transform various fields, including academic research and ophthalmology practice. The traditional peer review process, which has been a cornerstone of academic research for centuries, is no exception. Human reviewers, who received no monetary honorarium, dedicated their own time and effort in evaluating submitted articles to ensure quality and accuracy. However, the rise of AI and chatbots (e.g. ChatGPT) has sparked discussions about whether peer reviewers could spot the authors on using these tools in their submitted work to ophthalmology journals.","PeriodicalId":348405,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ophthalmology and Advance Research","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maintaining Quality and Accuracy in Ophthalmology Academic Research: The Importance of Traditional Peer Review\",\"authors\":\"Sunny Chi Lik Au\",\"doi\":\"10.46889/joar.2023.4201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the last few months, Artificial Intelligence (AI) and chatbots have gained significant attention and recognition as technological advancements that could transform various fields, including academic research and ophthalmology practice. The traditional peer review process, which has been a cornerstone of academic research for centuries, is no exception. Human reviewers, who received no monetary honorarium, dedicated their own time and effort in evaluating submitted articles to ensure quality and accuracy. However, the rise of AI and chatbots (e.g. ChatGPT) has sparked discussions about whether peer reviewers could spot the authors on using these tools in their submitted work to ophthalmology journals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":348405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ophthalmology and Advance Research\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ophthalmology and Advance Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46889/joar.2023.4201\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ophthalmology and Advance Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46889/joar.2023.4201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的几个月里,人工智能(AI)和聊天机器人作为可以改变包括学术研究和眼科实践在内的各个领域的技术进步,获得了极大的关注和认可。传统的同行评议过程,几个世纪以来一直是学术研究的基石,也不例外。人类审稿人不收取任何金钱酬金,他们投入自己的时间和精力来评估提交的文章,以确保质量和准确性。然而,人工智能和聊天机器人(例如ChatGPT)的兴起引发了关于同行评审是否可以发现作者在提交给眼科期刊的工作中使用这些工具的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Maintaining Quality and Accuracy in Ophthalmology Academic Research: The Importance of Traditional Peer Review
In the last few months, Artificial Intelligence (AI) and chatbots have gained significant attention and recognition as technological advancements that could transform various fields, including academic research and ophthalmology practice. The traditional peer review process, which has been a cornerstone of academic research for centuries, is no exception. Human reviewers, who received no monetary honorarium, dedicated their own time and effort in evaluating submitted articles to ensure quality and accuracy. However, the rise of AI and chatbots (e.g. ChatGPT) has sparked discussions about whether peer reviewers could spot the authors on using these tools in their submitted work to ophthalmology journals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Surgical Treatment of a Large-Angle Post Traumatic Hypertropia by The Inverse Knapp Procedure: A Case Report Correlation Between Primary Open Angle Glaucoma and Serum Lipids Diagnosis and Management of Orbital Cellulitis in a Reference Center in Senegal Evaluation of Postoperative Pain and Satisfaction After Orbital Fracture Repair Epidemio-Clinical Profile of Onchocerciasis in Sambwa in the Democratic Republic of Congo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1