有限预算下电网FACTS设备不同优化配置模型的比较

E. Malatji, Bhekisipho Twala, N. Mbuli
{"title":"有限预算下电网FACTS设备不同优化配置模型的比较","authors":"E. Malatji, Bhekisipho Twala, N. Mbuli","doi":"10.1109/icSmartGrid48354.2019.8990740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problem of transmission network congestion or overloading poses a serious challenge to most power utilities around the world. One solution to this problem is the use of FACTS devices. This paper presents an empirical comparison of different optimal placement models of FACTS devices in a power system network with the objective to maximize the system loadability (SL). The three configuration are considered in this comparison. In the first case only TCPST is considered, while in the second case only TCSC is considered and in the third one a combination of several devices is considered. The results show that the first and the third configuration performs better economically and in terms of system losses.","PeriodicalId":403137,"journal":{"name":"2019 7th International Conference on Smart Grid (icSmartGrid)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Different Optimal Placement Models of FACTS Devices in Power System Networks on a Limited Budget\",\"authors\":\"E. Malatji, Bhekisipho Twala, N. Mbuli\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/icSmartGrid48354.2019.8990740\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The problem of transmission network congestion or overloading poses a serious challenge to most power utilities around the world. One solution to this problem is the use of FACTS devices. This paper presents an empirical comparison of different optimal placement models of FACTS devices in a power system network with the objective to maximize the system loadability (SL). The three configuration are considered in this comparison. In the first case only TCPST is considered, while in the second case only TCSC is considered and in the third one a combination of several devices is considered. The results show that the first and the third configuration performs better economically and in terms of system losses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":403137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 7th International Conference on Smart Grid (icSmartGrid)\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 7th International Conference on Smart Grid (icSmartGrid)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/icSmartGrid48354.2019.8990740\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 7th International Conference on Smart Grid (icSmartGrid)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/icSmartGrid48354.2019.8990740","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

输电网络的拥塞或过载问题是世界上大多数电力公司面临的严峻挑战。这个问题的一个解决方案是使用FACTS设备。以系统负荷最大化为目标,对电网FACTS设备的不同优化配置模型进行了实证比较。在这个比较中考虑了三种配置。在第一种情况下只考虑TCPST,而在第二种情况下只考虑TCSC,在第三种情况下考虑几个设备的组合。结果表明,第一种和第三种配置在经济性和系统损耗方面表现更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Different Optimal Placement Models of FACTS Devices in Power System Networks on a Limited Budget
The problem of transmission network congestion or overloading poses a serious challenge to most power utilities around the world. One solution to this problem is the use of FACTS devices. This paper presents an empirical comparison of different optimal placement models of FACTS devices in a power system network with the objective to maximize the system loadability (SL). The three configuration are considered in this comparison. In the first case only TCPST is considered, while in the second case only TCSC is considered and in the third one a combination of several devices is considered. The results show that the first and the third configuration performs better economically and in terms of system losses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Method for Performability Study on Wide Area Communication Architectures for Smart Grid Robust Controller Based on Sliding Mode Technique of DFIG Integrated to Wind Energy System Movement Based Energy Management Models for Smart Buildings Integrated Smart Heating System in Historic Buildings The use of Dynamic Tariff by The Utilities to Counter act The Influence of Renewable Energy Sources
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1