将热油藏模拟器与动态多相井筒流动模拟器相结合,严格模拟复杂SAGD井的几何形状和完井过程

J. Rivero, Christopher Istchenko, C. Nascimento, Jianguang Cao, Hossein Aghabarati, Michael Bergen
{"title":"将热油藏模拟器与动态多相井筒流动模拟器相结合,严格模拟复杂SAGD井的几何形状和完井过程","authors":"J. Rivero, Christopher Istchenko, C. Nascimento, Jianguang Cao, Hossein Aghabarati, Michael Bergen","doi":"10.2118/208918-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this paper, we propose a methodology to iteratively couple a wellbore simulator and a reservoir simulator in order to model the complex flow regimes that exist in a producing SAGD well while still taking into consideration the fluid movement and distribution within the reservoir. The process was successfully tested and implemented in two SAGD pads and the results were compared with those obtained using a commercial, fully-coupled reservoir-wellbore model. This method addresses the modeling limitations encountered in typical thermal reservoir simulators that use source/sink or discretized formulations to describe wellbore flow.\n SAGD producers exhibit overly complex flow regimes caused by the presence of a steam phase that can condense within the wellbore and promote significant variations in temperatures and pressures along the tubulars. Therefore, standalone wellbore simulators are necessary to predict performance as accurately as possible; however, using a wellbore simulator alone will neglect the effects caused by varying inflow conditions from the reservoir. With these variations occurring both in time and in space (along the wellbore), it is necessary to include the dynamic input of a reservoir simulator, hence the rationale for coupling both models.\n The algorithm devised to integrate the wellbore and reservoir simulators was coded into a standalone GUI-driven computer program called a coupler. The coupler was used to evaluate the performance of new SAGD pairs and new infill producers featuring flow devices and slanted trajectories.\n In this work, we will present the results of field case studies with the proposed coupling approach to evaluate the effect on ultimate recovery of drilling new SAGD pairs and SAGD infills using toe-up or toe-down trajectories as well as fitting these wells with inflow control devices. When applying the coupling workflow to the case studies, we determined that despite challenging conditions, it is possible to have inclined SAGD wells properly transition from preheating to production as well as allowing access to previously untapped parts of the reservoir resources, which increased ultimate recovery.","PeriodicalId":146458,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Wed, March 16, 2022","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coupling a Thermal Reservoir Simulator with a Dynamic, Multiphase Wellbore Flow Simulator to Rigorously Model Complex SAGD Well Geometries and Completions\",\"authors\":\"J. Rivero, Christopher Istchenko, C. Nascimento, Jianguang Cao, Hossein Aghabarati, Michael Bergen\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/208918-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n In this paper, we propose a methodology to iteratively couple a wellbore simulator and a reservoir simulator in order to model the complex flow regimes that exist in a producing SAGD well while still taking into consideration the fluid movement and distribution within the reservoir. The process was successfully tested and implemented in two SAGD pads and the results were compared with those obtained using a commercial, fully-coupled reservoir-wellbore model. This method addresses the modeling limitations encountered in typical thermal reservoir simulators that use source/sink or discretized formulations to describe wellbore flow.\\n SAGD producers exhibit overly complex flow regimes caused by the presence of a steam phase that can condense within the wellbore and promote significant variations in temperatures and pressures along the tubulars. Therefore, standalone wellbore simulators are necessary to predict performance as accurately as possible; however, using a wellbore simulator alone will neglect the effects caused by varying inflow conditions from the reservoir. With these variations occurring both in time and in space (along the wellbore), it is necessary to include the dynamic input of a reservoir simulator, hence the rationale for coupling both models.\\n The algorithm devised to integrate the wellbore and reservoir simulators was coded into a standalone GUI-driven computer program called a coupler. The coupler was used to evaluate the performance of new SAGD pairs and new infill producers featuring flow devices and slanted trajectories.\\n In this work, we will present the results of field case studies with the proposed coupling approach to evaluate the effect on ultimate recovery of drilling new SAGD pairs and SAGD infills using toe-up or toe-down trajectories as well as fitting these wells with inflow control devices. When applying the coupling workflow to the case studies, we determined that despite challenging conditions, it is possible to have inclined SAGD wells properly transition from preheating to production as well as allowing access to previously untapped parts of the reservoir resources, which increased ultimate recovery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":146458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 1 Wed, March 16, 2022\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 1 Wed, March 16, 2022\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/208918-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Wed, March 16, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/208918-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们提出了一种迭代耦合井筒模拟器和油藏模拟器的方法,以便在考虑储层内流体运动和分布的同时,对SAGD生产井中存在的复杂流动模式进行建模。该工艺在两个SAGD区块成功进行了测试和实施,并将结果与使用商业、全耦合油藏井筒模型获得的结果进行了比较。该方法解决了典型热油藏模拟器在使用源/汇或离散公式来描述井筒流动时遇到的建模限制。SAGD生产商表现出过于复杂的流动状态,这是由于蒸汽相的存在,它可以在井筒内凝结,并导致沿管的温度和压力发生显著变化。因此,需要独立的井筒模拟器来尽可能准确地预测井筒性能;然而,单独使用井筒模拟器会忽略来自油藏的不同流入条件所造成的影响。由于这些变化发生在时间和空间上(沿着井筒),因此有必要包括油藏模拟器的动态输入,因此耦合两种模型的基本原理。设计用于集成井筒和油藏模拟的算法被编码为一个独立的gui驱动的计算机程序,称为耦合器。该耦合器用于评估新型SAGD副和具有流动装置和倾斜轨迹的新型填充生产器的性能。在这项工作中,我们将展示现场案例研究的结果,并提出耦合方法,以评估使用上斜或下斜轨迹钻井新SAGD副和SAGD充填对最终采收率的影响,以及在这些井中安装流入控制装置。当将耦合工作流程应用于案例研究时,我们确定,尽管条件具有挑战性,倾斜SAGD井仍然可以从预热过渡到生产,并且可以进入以前未开发的油藏资源部分,从而提高最终采收率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Coupling a Thermal Reservoir Simulator with a Dynamic, Multiphase Wellbore Flow Simulator to Rigorously Model Complex SAGD Well Geometries and Completions
In this paper, we propose a methodology to iteratively couple a wellbore simulator and a reservoir simulator in order to model the complex flow regimes that exist in a producing SAGD well while still taking into consideration the fluid movement and distribution within the reservoir. The process was successfully tested and implemented in two SAGD pads and the results were compared with those obtained using a commercial, fully-coupled reservoir-wellbore model. This method addresses the modeling limitations encountered in typical thermal reservoir simulators that use source/sink or discretized formulations to describe wellbore flow. SAGD producers exhibit overly complex flow regimes caused by the presence of a steam phase that can condense within the wellbore and promote significant variations in temperatures and pressures along the tubulars. Therefore, standalone wellbore simulators are necessary to predict performance as accurately as possible; however, using a wellbore simulator alone will neglect the effects caused by varying inflow conditions from the reservoir. With these variations occurring both in time and in space (along the wellbore), it is necessary to include the dynamic input of a reservoir simulator, hence the rationale for coupling both models. The algorithm devised to integrate the wellbore and reservoir simulators was coded into a standalone GUI-driven computer program called a coupler. The coupler was used to evaluate the performance of new SAGD pairs and new infill producers featuring flow devices and slanted trajectories. In this work, we will present the results of field case studies with the proposed coupling approach to evaluate the effect on ultimate recovery of drilling new SAGD pairs and SAGD infills using toe-up or toe-down trajectories as well as fitting these wells with inflow control devices. When applying the coupling workflow to the case studies, we determined that despite challenging conditions, it is possible to have inclined SAGD wells properly transition from preheating to production as well as allowing access to previously untapped parts of the reservoir resources, which increased ultimate recovery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Steam Additives to Reduce the Steam-Oil Ratio in SAGD: Experimental Analysis, Pilot Design, and Field Application Powering Offshore Installations with Wind Energy Quantification of Phase Behaviour and Physical Properties of Alkane Solvents/CO2/ Water/Heavy Oil Systems under Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium Conditions Profile Ultrasonic Velocity Measurements Performed on Slabbed Core: Implications for High-Resolution Permeability Prediction in Low-Permeability Rocks Holistic Real-Time Drilling Parameters Optimization Delivers Best-in-Class Drilling Performance and Preserves Bit Condition - A Case History from an Integrated Project in the Middle East
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1