{"title":"Salsa20和ChaCha的故障注入攻击及轻量级对策","authors":"Kazuhide Fukushima, Rui Xu, S. Kiyomoto, N. Homma","doi":"10.1109/Trustcom/BigDataSE/ICESS.2017.348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We propose a fault injection attack on Salsa20 and ChaCha stream ciphers. In these stream ciphers, the initial matrix X, which consists of constants, a key, a block counter, and a nonce, is added to the matrix X(20) process with a round function to generate a keystream. Our proposed fault injection attack skips the corresponding addition (add) instruction to obtain the matrix X or X(20) and extracts the key. General countermeasures against instruction skipping, including randomization, duplication, and parity checking, are not suitable for the software implementation of a stream cipher that requires high performance and lightweight computation. We thus demonstrate an algorithm-specific but extremely lightweight countermeasure with less than 0.5% execution time overhead based on a variable separation technique. Furthermore, we study the feasibility of the countermeasure in the IA-32, Intel 64, and ARM architectures.","PeriodicalId":170253,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE Trustcom/BigDataSE/ICESS","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fault Injection Attack on Salsa20 and ChaCha and a Lightweight Countermeasure\",\"authors\":\"Kazuhide Fukushima, Rui Xu, S. Kiyomoto, N. Homma\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/Trustcom/BigDataSE/ICESS.2017.348\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We propose a fault injection attack on Salsa20 and ChaCha stream ciphers. In these stream ciphers, the initial matrix X, which consists of constants, a key, a block counter, and a nonce, is added to the matrix X(20) process with a round function to generate a keystream. Our proposed fault injection attack skips the corresponding addition (add) instruction to obtain the matrix X or X(20) and extracts the key. General countermeasures against instruction skipping, including randomization, duplication, and parity checking, are not suitable for the software implementation of a stream cipher that requires high performance and lightweight computation. We thus demonstrate an algorithm-specific but extremely lightweight countermeasure with less than 0.5% execution time overhead based on a variable separation technique. Furthermore, we study the feasibility of the countermeasure in the IA-32, Intel 64, and ARM architectures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":170253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 IEEE Trustcom/BigDataSE/ICESS\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 IEEE Trustcom/BigDataSE/ICESS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/Trustcom/BigDataSE/ICESS.2017.348\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE Trustcom/BigDataSE/ICESS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/Trustcom/BigDataSE/ICESS.2017.348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Fault Injection Attack on Salsa20 and ChaCha and a Lightweight Countermeasure
We propose a fault injection attack on Salsa20 and ChaCha stream ciphers. In these stream ciphers, the initial matrix X, which consists of constants, a key, a block counter, and a nonce, is added to the matrix X(20) process with a round function to generate a keystream. Our proposed fault injection attack skips the corresponding addition (add) instruction to obtain the matrix X or X(20) and extracts the key. General countermeasures against instruction skipping, including randomization, duplication, and parity checking, are not suitable for the software implementation of a stream cipher that requires high performance and lightweight computation. We thus demonstrate an algorithm-specific but extremely lightweight countermeasure with less than 0.5% execution time overhead based on a variable separation technique. Furthermore, we study the feasibility of the countermeasure in the IA-32, Intel 64, and ARM architectures.