濒危物种

Bremer Gm
{"title":"濒危物种","authors":"Bremer Gm","doi":"10.3368/er.11.1.79","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Process. Wetland Journal 5(1):8-9.) has taken exception to use of reference wetlands. He argues that such an approach disregards the fact that each wetland is a dynamic, ever-changing system, and that no two are exactly alike. Instead, he prefers to compare the wetland as it ~vas designed to its condition after it has been constructed. While the authors acknowledge and recommend this \"as-built\" approach for at least one level of monitoring, they feel that by utilizing populations of both \"new\" and existing wetlands they have solved the problem of comparing two unique entities. Unfortunately, they fail to include case studies that might shed greater light on their methodology. In addition, the reader is left to wonder whether their relatively small study of newly restored and/or created freshwater ponds with only fringes of emergent marsh on which this protocol is based provides an adequate basis for evaluation of all types of wetlands. Is this a bureaucratic solution or a scientific one? Undoubtedly, this book will inspire discussion as to the best means to monitor and learn from wetland mitigation projects. Less controversial but still interesting are some short but informative chapters on recruiting and training volunteers as wetland monitors, employing graphics to display data, and using information about local natural wetlands to improve wetland project designs.","PeriodicalId":105419,"journal":{"name":"Restoration & Management Notes","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ENDANGERED SPECIES\",\"authors\":\"Bremer Gm\",\"doi\":\"10.3368/er.11.1.79\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Process. Wetland Journal 5(1):8-9.) has taken exception to use of reference wetlands. He argues that such an approach disregards the fact that each wetland is a dynamic, ever-changing system, and that no two are exactly alike. Instead, he prefers to compare the wetland as it ~vas designed to its condition after it has been constructed. While the authors acknowledge and recommend this \\\"as-built\\\" approach for at least one level of monitoring, they feel that by utilizing populations of both \\\"new\\\" and existing wetlands they have solved the problem of comparing two unique entities. Unfortunately, they fail to include case studies that might shed greater light on their methodology. In addition, the reader is left to wonder whether their relatively small study of newly restored and/or created freshwater ponds with only fringes of emergent marsh on which this protocol is based provides an adequate basis for evaluation of all types of wetlands. Is this a bureaucratic solution or a scientific one? Undoubtedly, this book will inspire discussion as to the best means to monitor and learn from wetland mitigation projects. Less controversial but still interesting are some short but informative chapters on recruiting and training volunteers as wetland monitors, employing graphics to display data, and using information about local natural wetlands to improve wetland project designs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":105419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Restoration & Management Notes\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Restoration & Management Notes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3368/er.11.1.79\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Restoration & Management Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3368/er.11.1.79","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

的过程。湿地学报5(1):8-9.)对参考湿地的使用提出了异议。他认为,这种方法忽视了这样一个事实,即每个湿地都是一个动态的、不断变化的系统,没有两个湿地是完全相同的。相反,他更喜欢将设计时的湿地与建成后的湿地进行比较。虽然作者承认并推荐这种“已建成”的方法至少用于一个层面的监测,但他们认为,通过利用“新”和现有湿地的种群,他们已经解决了比较两个独特实体的问题。不幸的是,他们没有包括案例研究,这些案例研究可能会更清楚地说明他们的方法。此外,读者不禁要问,他们对新恢复和/或新建的淡水池塘的相对较小的研究,是否为评估所有类型的湿地提供了足够的基础。这是官僚主义的解决方案还是科学的解决方案?毫无疑问,这本书将激发人们对湿地缓解项目的最佳监测和学习方式的讨论。争议较少但仍然有趣的是一些简短但内容丰富的章节,内容涉及招募和培训志愿者作为湿地监测员,使用图形显示数据,以及使用当地天然湿地的信息来改进湿地项目设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ENDANGERED SPECIES
Process. Wetland Journal 5(1):8-9.) has taken exception to use of reference wetlands. He argues that such an approach disregards the fact that each wetland is a dynamic, ever-changing system, and that no two are exactly alike. Instead, he prefers to compare the wetland as it ~vas designed to its condition after it has been constructed. While the authors acknowledge and recommend this "as-built" approach for at least one level of monitoring, they feel that by utilizing populations of both "new" and existing wetlands they have solved the problem of comparing two unique entities. Unfortunately, they fail to include case studies that might shed greater light on their methodology. In addition, the reader is left to wonder whether their relatively small study of newly restored and/or created freshwater ponds with only fringes of emergent marsh on which this protocol is based provides an adequate basis for evaluation of all types of wetlands. Is this a bureaucratic solution or a scientific one? Undoubtedly, this book will inspire discussion as to the best means to monitor and learn from wetland mitigation projects. Less controversial but still interesting are some short but informative chapters on recruiting and training volunteers as wetland monitors, employing graphics to display data, and using information about local natural wetlands to improve wetland project designs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Forests EDUCATION Forest Forests Conference Reports
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1