一种基于信息论原理的加权一致函数组合软聚类

Yan Gao, Shiwen Gu, Jianhua Li, Zhining Liao
{"title":"一种基于信息论原理的加权一致函数组合软聚类","authors":"Yan Gao, Shiwen Gu, Jianhua Li, Zhining Liao","doi":"10.1109/GrC.2007.156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How to combine multiple clusterings into a single clustering solution of better quality is a critical problem in cluster ensemble. In this paper, we extend Strehl's consensus function based on information- theoretic principles and propose a novel weighted consensus function to combine multiple \"soft\" clusterings. In our consensus function, we use mutual information to measure the sharing information between two \"soft\" clusterings and emphasize the clustering which is much different from the others. We use the algorithm similar to sequential k-means to obtain the solution of this consensus function and conduct experiments on four real-world datasets to compare our algorithm with other four consensus function, including CSPA, HGPA, MCLA, QMI. The results indicate that our consensus function provides solutions of better quality than CSPA, HGPA, MCLA, QMI and when the distribution of diversity in cluster ensembles is uneven, considering the influence of diversity can improve the quality of clustering ensemble.","PeriodicalId":259430,"journal":{"name":"2007 IEEE International Conference on Granular Computing (GRC 2007)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Weighted Consensus Function Based on Information-Theoretic Principles to Combine Soft Clusterings\",\"authors\":\"Yan Gao, Shiwen Gu, Jianhua Li, Zhining Liao\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/GrC.2007.156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"How to combine multiple clusterings into a single clustering solution of better quality is a critical problem in cluster ensemble. In this paper, we extend Strehl's consensus function based on information- theoretic principles and propose a novel weighted consensus function to combine multiple \\\"soft\\\" clusterings. In our consensus function, we use mutual information to measure the sharing information between two \\\"soft\\\" clusterings and emphasize the clustering which is much different from the others. We use the algorithm similar to sequential k-means to obtain the solution of this consensus function and conduct experiments on four real-world datasets to compare our algorithm with other four consensus function, including CSPA, HGPA, MCLA, QMI. The results indicate that our consensus function provides solutions of better quality than CSPA, HGPA, MCLA, QMI and when the distribution of diversity in cluster ensembles is uneven, considering the influence of diversity can improve the quality of clustering ensemble.\",\"PeriodicalId\":259430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2007 IEEE International Conference on Granular Computing (GRC 2007)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2007 IEEE International Conference on Granular Computing (GRC 2007)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/GrC.2007.156\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 IEEE International Conference on Granular Computing (GRC 2007)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/GrC.2007.156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

如何将多个聚类组合成一个质量更好的聚类解是聚类集成中的一个关键问题。本文基于信息论原理,对Strehl的共识函数进行了扩展,提出了一种新的加权共识函数来组合多个“软”聚类。在我们的共识函数中,我们使用互信息来衡量两个“软”聚类之间的共享信息,并强调与其他聚类有很大不同的聚类。我们使用类似于序列k-means的算法来获得该共识函数的解,并在四个真实数据集上进行实验,将我们的算法与CSPA、HGPA、MCLA、QMI等其他四种共识函数进行比较。结果表明,我们的共识函数提供了比CSPA、HGPA、MCLA、QMI更好的解决方案,当多样性在聚类集合中分布不均匀时,考虑多样性的影响可以提高聚类集合的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Weighted Consensus Function Based on Information-Theoretic Principles to Combine Soft Clusterings
How to combine multiple clusterings into a single clustering solution of better quality is a critical problem in cluster ensemble. In this paper, we extend Strehl's consensus function based on information- theoretic principles and propose a novel weighted consensus function to combine multiple "soft" clusterings. In our consensus function, we use mutual information to measure the sharing information between two "soft" clusterings and emphasize the clustering which is much different from the others. We use the algorithm similar to sequential k-means to obtain the solution of this consensus function and conduct experiments on four real-world datasets to compare our algorithm with other four consensus function, including CSPA, HGPA, MCLA, QMI. The results indicate that our consensus function provides solutions of better quality than CSPA, HGPA, MCLA, QMI and when the distribution of diversity in cluster ensembles is uneven, considering the influence of diversity can improve the quality of clustering ensemble.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Study of the Query Target of the Chinese Query Sentence Intelligent Search Engine Based on Formal Concept Analysis Analyzing Software System Quality Risk Using Bayesian Belief Network Reasoning Algorithm of Multi-Value Fuzzy Causality Diagram Based on Unitizing Coefficient Application of Granular Computing in Extension Criminal Reconnaissance System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1