脑和DCNN表征几何预测可变性的意识访问

D. Lindh, I. Sligte, K. Shapiro, I. Charest
{"title":"脑和DCNN表征几何预测可变性的意识访问","authors":"D. Lindh, I. Sligte, K. Shapiro, I. Charest","doi":"10.32470/ccn.2019.1287-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When two targets (T1 and T2) are presented in a rapidly sequentially-presented stream of distractors, subjects often show a clear deficiency to report T2 when presented 200-500 ms after T1. This effect is known as the Attentional Blink (AB). Using the AB as a method to quantify the probability of conscious access, we investigate why some images seem to rise to consciousness more readily. By defining the representational relationships between images using fMRI and CNNs, we show that images that are distinct in high-level representations are more resilient to the AB effect, while low-level similarity to other images increase the probability of conscious access. These results were replicated using representational geometries derived from both functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). This provides additional parallels between the hierarchical complexity of CNNs trained on object classification and the human visual ventral stream, with CNN and brain representations predicting behaviour in a similar way.","PeriodicalId":281121,"journal":{"name":"2019 Conference on Cognitive Computational Neuroscience","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brain and DCNN representational geometries predict variability in conscious access\",\"authors\":\"D. Lindh, I. Sligte, K. Shapiro, I. Charest\",\"doi\":\"10.32470/ccn.2019.1287-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When two targets (T1 and T2) are presented in a rapidly sequentially-presented stream of distractors, subjects often show a clear deficiency to report T2 when presented 200-500 ms after T1. This effect is known as the Attentional Blink (AB). Using the AB as a method to quantify the probability of conscious access, we investigate why some images seem to rise to consciousness more readily. By defining the representational relationships between images using fMRI and CNNs, we show that images that are distinct in high-level representations are more resilient to the AB effect, while low-level similarity to other images increase the probability of conscious access. These results were replicated using representational geometries derived from both functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). This provides additional parallels between the hierarchical complexity of CNNs trained on object classification and the human visual ventral stream, with CNN and brain representations predicting behaviour in a similar way.\",\"PeriodicalId\":281121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 Conference on Cognitive Computational Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 Conference on Cognitive Computational Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32470/ccn.2019.1287-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 Conference on Cognitive Computational Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32470/ccn.2019.1287-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当两个目标(T1和T2)在快速顺序呈现的分心物流中呈现时,在T1后200-500 ms时,受试者往往表现出明显的T2报告缺陷。这种效应被称为注意力闪烁(attention Blink, AB)。使用AB作为一种量化有意识进入概率的方法,我们研究了为什么有些图像似乎更容易进入意识。通过使用fMRI和cnn定义图像之间的表征关系,我们发现在高级表征中不同的图像对AB效应更有弹性,而与其他图像的低级相似性增加了有意识访问的可能性。这些结果是通过功能性磁共振成像(fMRI)和卷积神经网络(CNN)得出的表征几何来复制的。这提供了CNN训练对象分类的层次复杂性与人类视觉腹侧流之间的额外相似之处,CNN和大脑表征以类似的方式预测行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Brain and DCNN representational geometries predict variability in conscious access
When two targets (T1 and T2) are presented in a rapidly sequentially-presented stream of distractors, subjects often show a clear deficiency to report T2 when presented 200-500 ms after T1. This effect is known as the Attentional Blink (AB). Using the AB as a method to quantify the probability of conscious access, we investigate why some images seem to rise to consciousness more readily. By defining the representational relationships between images using fMRI and CNNs, we show that images that are distinct in high-level representations are more resilient to the AB effect, while low-level similarity to other images increase the probability of conscious access. These results were replicated using representational geometries derived from both functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). This provides additional parallels between the hierarchical complexity of CNNs trained on object classification and the human visual ventral stream, with CNN and brain representations predicting behaviour in a similar way.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Narratives as Networks: Predicting Memory from the Structure of Naturalistic Events Subtractive gating improves generalization in working memory tasks Do LSTMs know about Principle C? Unfolding of multisensory inference in the brain and behavior Adversarial Training of Neural Encoding Models on Population Spike Trains
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1