概括社会实验的结果:来自印度的理论和证据

M. Gechter
{"title":"概括社会实验的结果:来自印度的理论和证据","authors":"M. Gechter","doi":"10.1080/07350015.2023.2241529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How informative are treatment effects estimated in one region or time period for another region or time? In this paper, I derive bounds on the average treatment effect in a context of interest using experimental evidence from another context. The bounds are based on (1) the information identified about treatment effect heterogeneity due to unobservables in the experiment and (2) using differences in outcome distributions across contexts to learn about differences in distributions of unobservables. Empirically, using data from a pair of remedial education experiments carried out in India, I show the bounds are able to recover average treatment effects in one location using results from the other while the benchmark method cannot.","PeriodicalId":118766,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business & Economic Statistics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Generalizing the Results from Social Experiments: Theory and Evidence from India\",\"authors\":\"M. Gechter\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07350015.2023.2241529\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"How informative are treatment effects estimated in one region or time period for another region or time? In this paper, I derive bounds on the average treatment effect in a context of interest using experimental evidence from another context. The bounds are based on (1) the information identified about treatment effect heterogeneity due to unobservables in the experiment and (2) using differences in outcome distributions across contexts to learn about differences in distributions of unobservables. Empirically, using data from a pair of remedial education experiments carried out in India, I show the bounds are able to recover average treatment effects in one location using results from the other while the benchmark method cannot.\",\"PeriodicalId\":118766,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business & Economic Statistics\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business & Economic Statistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.2023.2241529\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business & Economic Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.2023.2241529","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在一个地区或时间段估计的治疗效果对另一个地区或时间段的信息量有多大?在本文中,我使用来自另一个上下文的实验证据推导出感兴趣的上下文中的平均治疗效果的界限。界限是基于(1)由于实验中不可观察的结果而确定的治疗效果异质性的信息,以及(2)使用不同背景下结果分布的差异来了解不可观察分布的差异。从经验上讲,我使用了在印度进行的一对补救教育实验的数据,表明边界能够使用另一个地方的结果恢复一个地方的平均治疗效果,而基准方法则不能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Generalizing the Results from Social Experiments: Theory and Evidence from India
How informative are treatment effects estimated in one region or time period for another region or time? In this paper, I derive bounds on the average treatment effect in a context of interest using experimental evidence from another context. The bounds are based on (1) the information identified about treatment effect heterogeneity due to unobservables in the experiment and (2) using differences in outcome distributions across contexts to learn about differences in distributions of unobservables. Empirically, using data from a pair of remedial education experiments carried out in India, I show the bounds are able to recover average treatment effects in one location using results from the other while the benchmark method cannot.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Decomposition of Differences in Distribution under Sample Selection and the Gender Wage Gap Imputation of Counterfactual Outcomes when the Errors are Predicatable Simultaneous Confidence Intervals for Partially Identified Parameters Estimation of the Local Conditional Tail Average Treatment Effect* Forecasting Inflation Using Economic Narratives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1