多模态感知在手语分类中的应用研究

Sneha Sharma, Rinki Gupta, Arun Kumar
{"title":"多模态感知在手语分类中的应用研究","authors":"Sneha Sharma, Rinki Gupta, Arun Kumar","doi":"10.1109/SPIN.2019.8711702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In literature, sign language recognition (SLR) has been proposed using multi-channel data acquisition devices with various sensing modalities. When using wearable sensors, multimodality data acquisition has been shown to be particularly useful for improving the classification accuracies as compared to single modality data acquisition. In this work, a statistical analysis is presented to quantify the performance of different combinations of wearable sensors such as surface electromyogram (sEMG), accelerometers and gyroscopes in the classification of isolated signs. Twelve signs from the Indian sign language are considered such that the signs consist of static hand postures, as well as complex motion of forearm and simple wrist motions. Following four combinations of sensor modalities are compared for classification accuracies using statistical tests: 1) accelerometer and gyroscope 2) sEMG and accelerometer, 3) sEMG and gyroscope and finally, 4) sEMG, accelerometer and gyroscope. Results obtained on actual data indicate that the combination of all three modalities, namely sEMG, accelerometer and gyroscope yield the best classification accuracy of 88.25% as compared to the remaining sensor combinations. However, the statistical analysis of the classification accuracies using analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicates that the use of sEMG sensors is particularly useful in the classification of static hand postures. Moreover, the classification of signs involving dynamic motion of hands either with simple wrist motion or motion of hand along a complex trajectory is comparatively better with any sensing modality as compared to the classification of static hand postures.","PeriodicalId":344030,"journal":{"name":"2019 6th International Conference on Signal Processing and Integrated Networks (SPIN)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Use of Multi-Modal Sensing in Sign Language Classification\",\"authors\":\"Sneha Sharma, Rinki Gupta, Arun Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SPIN.2019.8711702\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In literature, sign language recognition (SLR) has been proposed using multi-channel data acquisition devices with various sensing modalities. When using wearable sensors, multimodality data acquisition has been shown to be particularly useful for improving the classification accuracies as compared to single modality data acquisition. In this work, a statistical analysis is presented to quantify the performance of different combinations of wearable sensors such as surface electromyogram (sEMG), accelerometers and gyroscopes in the classification of isolated signs. Twelve signs from the Indian sign language are considered such that the signs consist of static hand postures, as well as complex motion of forearm and simple wrist motions. Following four combinations of sensor modalities are compared for classification accuracies using statistical tests: 1) accelerometer and gyroscope 2) sEMG and accelerometer, 3) sEMG and gyroscope and finally, 4) sEMG, accelerometer and gyroscope. Results obtained on actual data indicate that the combination of all three modalities, namely sEMG, accelerometer and gyroscope yield the best classification accuracy of 88.25% as compared to the remaining sensor combinations. However, the statistical analysis of the classification accuracies using analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicates that the use of sEMG sensors is particularly useful in the classification of static hand postures. Moreover, the classification of signs involving dynamic motion of hands either with simple wrist motion or motion of hand along a complex trajectory is comparatively better with any sensing modality as compared to the classification of static hand postures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":344030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 6th International Conference on Signal Processing and Integrated Networks (SPIN)\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 6th International Conference on Signal Processing and Integrated Networks (SPIN)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SPIN.2019.8711702\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 6th International Conference on Signal Processing and Integrated Networks (SPIN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SPIN.2019.8711702","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在文献中,手语识别(SLR)已经被提出使用多通道数据采集设备与各种传感模式。当使用可穿戴传感器时,与单模态数据采集相比,多模态数据采集对提高分类精度特别有用。在这项工作中,提出了一种统计分析来量化可穿戴传感器(如表面肌电图(sEMG)),加速度计和陀螺仪等不同组合在孤立符号分类中的性能。来自印度手语的12个手势被认为是这样的,这些手势包括静态的手部姿势,以及复杂的前臂运动和简单的手腕运动。使用统计测试比较了以下四种传感器模式组合的分类精度:1)加速度计和陀螺仪;2)表面肌电信号和加速度计;3)表面肌电信号和陀螺仪;4)表面肌电信号、加速度计和陀螺仪。在实际数据上得到的结果表明,与其他传感器组合相比,表面肌电信号、加速度计和陀螺仪三种模式的组合分类准确率最高,为88.25%。然而,使用方差分析(ANOVA)对分类精度进行统计分析表明,表面肌电信号传感器在静态手势分类中特别有用。此外,与静态手部姿势的分类相比,任何感知方式下涉及手部动态运动或手部沿复杂轨迹运动的手势分类都相对更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On the Use of Multi-Modal Sensing in Sign Language Classification
In literature, sign language recognition (SLR) has been proposed using multi-channel data acquisition devices with various sensing modalities. When using wearable sensors, multimodality data acquisition has been shown to be particularly useful for improving the classification accuracies as compared to single modality data acquisition. In this work, a statistical analysis is presented to quantify the performance of different combinations of wearable sensors such as surface electromyogram (sEMG), accelerometers and gyroscopes in the classification of isolated signs. Twelve signs from the Indian sign language are considered such that the signs consist of static hand postures, as well as complex motion of forearm and simple wrist motions. Following four combinations of sensor modalities are compared for classification accuracies using statistical tests: 1) accelerometer and gyroscope 2) sEMG and accelerometer, 3) sEMG and gyroscope and finally, 4) sEMG, accelerometer and gyroscope. Results obtained on actual data indicate that the combination of all three modalities, namely sEMG, accelerometer and gyroscope yield the best classification accuracy of 88.25% as compared to the remaining sensor combinations. However, the statistical analysis of the classification accuracies using analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicates that the use of sEMG sensors is particularly useful in the classification of static hand postures. Moreover, the classification of signs involving dynamic motion of hands either with simple wrist motion or motion of hand along a complex trajectory is comparatively better with any sensing modality as compared to the classification of static hand postures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Data Classification by Reducing Bias of Domain-Oriented Knowledge Based on Data Jackets A Robust Automatic Algorithm for Statistical Analysis and Classification of Lung Auscultations Modified Dispersion Equation for Planar Open Tape Helix Travelling Wave Tube Experimental Analysis of Power Generation for Ultra-Low Power Wireless Sensor Nodes Using Various Coatings on Thermoelectric Energy Harvester A Novel Reconfigurable Patch Antenna with Parasitic Patch
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1