打碎单向镜子。实务中的资料主体查阅权

J. Ausloos, Pierre Dewitte
{"title":"打碎单向镜子。实务中的资料主体查阅权","authors":"J. Ausloos, Pierre Dewitte","doi":"10.1093/IDPL/IPY001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The right of access occupies a central role in EU data protection law's arsenal of data subject empowerment measures. It can be seen as a necessary enabler for most other data subject rights as well as an important role in monitoring operations and (en)forcing compliance. Despite some high-profile revelations regarding unsavoury data processing practices over the past few years, access rights still appear to be underused and not properly accommodated. It is especially this last hypothesis we tried to investigate and substantiate through a legal empirical study. During the first half of 2017, around sixty information society service providers were contacted with data subject access requests. Eventually, the study confirmed the general suspicion that access rights are by and large not adequately accommodated. The systematic approach did allow for a more granular identification of key issues and broader problematic trends. Notably, it uncovered an often-flagrant lack of awareness; organisation; motivation; and harmonisation. Despite the poor results of the empirical study, we still believe there to be an important role for data subject empowerment tools in a hyper-complex, automated and ubiquitous data-processing ecosystem. Even if only used marginally, they provide a checks and balances infrastructure overseeing controllers' processing operations, both on an individual basis as well as collectively. The empirical findings also allow identifying concrete suggestions aimed at controllers, such as relatively easy fixes in privacy policies and access rights templates.","PeriodicalId":179517,"journal":{"name":"Information Privacy Law eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"51","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shattering One-Way Mirrors. Data Subject Access Rights in Practice\",\"authors\":\"J. Ausloos, Pierre Dewitte\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/IDPL/IPY001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The right of access occupies a central role in EU data protection law's arsenal of data subject empowerment measures. It can be seen as a necessary enabler for most other data subject rights as well as an important role in monitoring operations and (en)forcing compliance. Despite some high-profile revelations regarding unsavoury data processing practices over the past few years, access rights still appear to be underused and not properly accommodated. It is especially this last hypothesis we tried to investigate and substantiate through a legal empirical study. During the first half of 2017, around sixty information society service providers were contacted with data subject access requests. Eventually, the study confirmed the general suspicion that access rights are by and large not adequately accommodated. The systematic approach did allow for a more granular identification of key issues and broader problematic trends. Notably, it uncovered an often-flagrant lack of awareness; organisation; motivation; and harmonisation. Despite the poor results of the empirical study, we still believe there to be an important role for data subject empowerment tools in a hyper-complex, automated and ubiquitous data-processing ecosystem. Even if only used marginally, they provide a checks and balances infrastructure overseeing controllers' processing operations, both on an individual basis as well as collectively. The empirical findings also allow identifying concrete suggestions aimed at controllers, such as relatively easy fixes in privacy policies and access rights templates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":179517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Privacy Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"51\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Privacy Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/IDPL/IPY001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Privacy Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/IDPL/IPY001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 51

摘要

访问权在欧盟数据保护法的数据主体授权措施中占有核心地位。它可以被视为大多数其他数据主体权利的必要推动因素,以及在监控操作和强制遵守方面的重要作用。尽管在过去几年中有一些令人不快的数据处理行为被高调曝光,但访问权似乎仍然没有得到充分利用,也没有得到适当的照顾。特别是最后一种假设,我们试图通过法律实证研究来调查和证实。在2017年上半年,约有60家信息社会服务提供商就数据主体访问请求进行了联系。最终,这项研究证实了人们普遍的怀疑,即获取权利基本上没有得到充分的照顾。系统的方法确实能够更细致地确定关键问题和更广泛的问题趋势。值得注意的是,它揭示了一种经常公然缺乏意识的情况;组织;动机;和协调。尽管实证研究结果不佳,但我们仍然相信,在一个超复杂、自动化和无处不在的数据处理生态系统中,数据主体赋权工具将发挥重要作用。即使只是少量使用,它们也提供了一个制衡的基础设施,监督控制人员的处理操作,无论是在个人的基础上还是在集体的基础上。实证研究结果还允许确定针对控制者的具体建议,例如在隐私政策和访问权限模板中相对容易的修复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Shattering One-Way Mirrors. Data Subject Access Rights in Practice
The right of access occupies a central role in EU data protection law's arsenal of data subject empowerment measures. It can be seen as a necessary enabler for most other data subject rights as well as an important role in monitoring operations and (en)forcing compliance. Despite some high-profile revelations regarding unsavoury data processing practices over the past few years, access rights still appear to be underused and not properly accommodated. It is especially this last hypothesis we tried to investigate and substantiate through a legal empirical study. During the first half of 2017, around sixty information society service providers were contacted with data subject access requests. Eventually, the study confirmed the general suspicion that access rights are by and large not adequately accommodated. The systematic approach did allow for a more granular identification of key issues and broader problematic trends. Notably, it uncovered an often-flagrant lack of awareness; organisation; motivation; and harmonisation. Despite the poor results of the empirical study, we still believe there to be an important role for data subject empowerment tools in a hyper-complex, automated and ubiquitous data-processing ecosystem. Even if only used marginally, they provide a checks and balances infrastructure overseeing controllers' processing operations, both on an individual basis as well as collectively. The empirical findings also allow identifying concrete suggestions aimed at controllers, such as relatively easy fixes in privacy policies and access rights templates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Policy Responses to Cross-border Central Bank Digital Currencies – Assessing the Transborder Effects of Digital Yuan Artificial Intelligence in the Internet of Health Things: Is the Solution to AI Privacy More AI? Comments on GDPR Enforcement EDPB Decision 01/020 Privacy Rights and Data Security: GDPR and Personal Data Driven Markets Big Boss is Watching You! The Right to Privacy of Employees in the Context of Workplace Surveillance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1