在超媒体检查期间指导可用性评估人员

M. Costabile, A. D. Angeli, M. Matera
{"title":"在超媒体检查期间指导可用性评估人员","authors":"M. Costabile, A. D. Angeli, M. Matera","doi":"10.1109/HCC.2001.995283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents an empirical validation of the abstract tasks (ATs), which are operational guidelines driving the inspection activities during a usability evaluation. Two groups of inspectors evaluated a multimedia CD-ROM, one group using the ATs, the other group using a list of heuristics. Results demonstrated a better performance of the AT group but raised some issues concerning the acceptability of the technique.","PeriodicalId":438014,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings IEEE Symposia on Human-Centric Computing Languages and Environments (Cat. No.01TH8587)","volume":"81 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Guiding usability evaluators during hypermedia inspection\",\"authors\":\"M. Costabile, A. D. Angeli, M. Matera\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HCC.2001.995283\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents an empirical validation of the abstract tasks (ATs), which are operational guidelines driving the inspection activities during a usability evaluation. Two groups of inspectors evaluated a multimedia CD-ROM, one group using the ATs, the other group using a list of heuristics. Results demonstrated a better performance of the AT group but raised some issues concerning the acceptability of the technique.\",\"PeriodicalId\":438014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings IEEE Symposia on Human-Centric Computing Languages and Environments (Cat. No.01TH8587)\",\"volume\":\"81 3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings IEEE Symposia on Human-Centric Computing Languages and Environments (Cat. No.01TH8587)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HCC.2001.995283\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings IEEE Symposia on Human-Centric Computing Languages and Environments (Cat. No.01TH8587)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HCC.2001.995283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文提出了抽象任务(at)的经验验证,它是在可用性评估期间驱动检查活动的操作指南。两组检查员评估一张多媒体光盘,一组使用ATs,另一组使用启发式列表。结果显示AT组有更好的表现,但提出了一些关于该技术可接受性的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Guiding usability evaluators during hypermedia inspection
This paper presents an empirical validation of the abstract tasks (ATs), which are operational guidelines driving the inspection activities during a usability evaluation. Two groups of inspectors evaluated a multimedia CD-ROM, one group using the ATs, the other group using a list of heuristics. Results demonstrated a better performance of the AT group but raised some issues concerning the acceptability of the technique.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
New paradigm for developing software for E-business Chinese whispers. Semiotically mediating between idea and program How children understand concurrent comics: experiences from LOFI and HIFI prototypes The ptolemy II framework for visual languages Processing UML models with visual scripts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1