{"title":"在评估罪犯犯罪行为的风险和对治疗的可能反应时,是否最重要的一个组成部分是按照《哈尔精神病检查表-修订版》(pclr)的定义来测量精神病?","authors":"Menna Rose","doi":"10.53841/bpspag.2019.1.113.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hare’s (2003) Psychopathy Checklist – Revised (PCL-R) comprises a 20-item checklist designed to assess the clinical construct of psychopathy. There is research to show that the PCL-R has impressive predictive validity for offending behaviour, and this has led some to suggest that psychopathy is the most important single component to measure when assessing risk of offending behaviour and likely response to treatment. Here I consider and critique the evidence for and against this argument.","PeriodicalId":166013,"journal":{"name":"PsyPag Quarterly","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is measuring psychopathy as defined by the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) the most important single component in assessing risk of offending behaviour and likely response to treatment in offenders?\",\"authors\":\"Menna Rose\",\"doi\":\"10.53841/bpspag.2019.1.113.9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Hare’s (2003) Psychopathy Checklist – Revised (PCL-R) comprises a 20-item checklist designed to assess the clinical construct of psychopathy. There is research to show that the PCL-R has impressive predictive validity for offending behaviour, and this has led some to suggest that psychopathy is the most important single component to measure when assessing risk of offending behaviour and likely response to treatment. Here I consider and critique the evidence for and against this argument.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PsyPag Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PsyPag Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpspag.2019.1.113.9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PsyPag Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpspag.2019.1.113.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Is measuring psychopathy as defined by the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) the most important single component in assessing risk of offending behaviour and likely response to treatment in offenders?
Hare’s (2003) Psychopathy Checklist – Revised (PCL-R) comprises a 20-item checklist designed to assess the clinical construct of psychopathy. There is research to show that the PCL-R has impressive predictive validity for offending behaviour, and this has led some to suggest that psychopathy is the most important single component to measure when assessing risk of offending behaviour and likely response to treatment. Here I consider and critique the evidence for and against this argument.