金融危机后的风险投资:企业风险投资如何促进新的创业集群(并协助政府的创新努力)

J. McCahery, E. Vermeulen
{"title":"金融危机后的风险投资:企业风险投资如何促进新的创业集群(并协助政府的创新努力)","authors":"J. McCahery, E. Vermeulen","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1617585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In his book, 'Boulevard of Broken Dreams: Why Public Efforts to Boost Entrepreneurship and Venture Capital Have Failed - and What to Do about It,' Harvard Business School Professor, Josh Lerner, explains that governments can only play a limited role in spurring innovation and entrepreneurship. Government initiatives are usually characterized by poor design and a lack of understanding for the venture capital process. He argues that governments better limit their role as catalysts by: (1) ensuring that the economic environment is conducive to entrepreneurial activity; and (2) providing direct investments. In this paper, we investigate the recent examples of governments that have followed either one of these suggestions. Relying on standard measures of success, we find that the participation of multinationals plays a crucial role in realizing the success of these initiatives. In the aftermath of the financial crisis, there is a world-wide revival of corporate venturing activities. We can now see that, insofar as it operates through corporate venture capital investments, the venture capital market is getting its magic back - and that when corporations participate in the process, it gives both strategic and financial benefits to the parties involved, such as governments, traditional venture capitalists, and entrepreneurs. The paper shows a shift in the fundamental nature of corporate venture capital and provides an account of the governance structures and contractual characteristics that encourage successful alliances between corporations and venture capital funds and their portfolio companies.","PeriodicalId":131271,"journal":{"name":"IRPN: Innovation & Entrepreneurship (Topic)","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Venture Capital Beyond the Financial Crisis: How Corporate Venturing Boosts New Entrepreneurial Clusters (and Assists Governments in Their Innovation Efforts)\",\"authors\":\"J. McCahery, E. Vermeulen\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1617585\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In his book, 'Boulevard of Broken Dreams: Why Public Efforts to Boost Entrepreneurship and Venture Capital Have Failed - and What to Do about It,' Harvard Business School Professor, Josh Lerner, explains that governments can only play a limited role in spurring innovation and entrepreneurship. Government initiatives are usually characterized by poor design and a lack of understanding for the venture capital process. He argues that governments better limit their role as catalysts by: (1) ensuring that the economic environment is conducive to entrepreneurial activity; and (2) providing direct investments. In this paper, we investigate the recent examples of governments that have followed either one of these suggestions. Relying on standard measures of success, we find that the participation of multinationals plays a crucial role in realizing the success of these initiatives. In the aftermath of the financial crisis, there is a world-wide revival of corporate venturing activities. We can now see that, insofar as it operates through corporate venture capital investments, the venture capital market is getting its magic back - and that when corporations participate in the process, it gives both strategic and financial benefits to the parties involved, such as governments, traditional venture capitalists, and entrepreneurs. The paper shows a shift in the fundamental nature of corporate venture capital and provides an account of the governance structures and contractual characteristics that encourage successful alliances between corporations and venture capital funds and their portfolio companies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":131271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IRPN: Innovation & Entrepreneurship (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IRPN: Innovation & Entrepreneurship (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1617585\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRPN: Innovation & Entrepreneurship (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1617585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

哈佛商学院(Harvard Business School)教授乔希•勒纳(Josh Lerner)在他的书《破碎的梦想大道:为什么公众推动创业和风险投资的努力失败了——以及如何应对》中解释说,政府在刺激创新和创业方面只能发挥有限的作用。政府倡议的特点通常是设计不良和对风险资本过程缺乏了解。他认为,政府最好通过以下方式限制其作为催化剂的作用:(1)确保经济环境有利于创业活动;(2)提供直接投资。在本文中,我们调查了最近政府遵循这些建议之一的例子。根据成功的标准衡量标准,我们发现跨国公司的参与在实现这些举措的成功方面起着至关重要的作用。金融危机过后,全球范围内企业风险投资活动复苏。我们现在可以看到,只要它通过企业风险资本投资运作,风险资本市场正在恢复其魔力——当企业参与这一过程时,它会给相关各方(如政府、传统风险资本家和企业家)带来战略和财务上的利益。本文展示了企业风险投资基本性质的转变,并提供了鼓励企业与风险投资基金及其投资组合公司之间成功联盟的治理结构和契约特征的说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Venture Capital Beyond the Financial Crisis: How Corporate Venturing Boosts New Entrepreneurial Clusters (and Assists Governments in Their Innovation Efforts)
In his book, 'Boulevard of Broken Dreams: Why Public Efforts to Boost Entrepreneurship and Venture Capital Have Failed - and What to Do about It,' Harvard Business School Professor, Josh Lerner, explains that governments can only play a limited role in spurring innovation and entrepreneurship. Government initiatives are usually characterized by poor design and a lack of understanding for the venture capital process. He argues that governments better limit their role as catalysts by: (1) ensuring that the economic environment is conducive to entrepreneurial activity; and (2) providing direct investments. In this paper, we investigate the recent examples of governments that have followed either one of these suggestions. Relying on standard measures of success, we find that the participation of multinationals plays a crucial role in realizing the success of these initiatives. In the aftermath of the financial crisis, there is a world-wide revival of corporate venturing activities. We can now see that, insofar as it operates through corporate venture capital investments, the venture capital market is getting its magic back - and that when corporations participate in the process, it gives both strategic and financial benefits to the parties involved, such as governments, traditional venture capitalists, and entrepreneurs. The paper shows a shift in the fundamental nature of corporate venture capital and provides an account of the governance structures and contractual characteristics that encourage successful alliances between corporations and venture capital funds and their portfolio companies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Consequences of Intrapreneurship in Exporting Firms: A Structural-model Approach How the Law Can Better Protect Small Business Owners against Location Risk in the Brick-and-Mortar Retail Sector K-Y Index: A Dow Jones like Index for Global Cryptocurrency Markets Business Plan: A Road Map for a Successful Entrepreneurship Financial Innovation for Energy Innovation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1