洛克纳时代的第四修正案:宪法理论中的隐私、财产与自由

Morgan Cloud
{"title":"洛克纳时代的第四修正案:宪法理论中的隐私、财产与自由","authors":"Morgan Cloud","doi":"10.2307/1229278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, Professor Morgan Cloud proposes a surprising remedy for a Fourth Amendment jurisprudence he criticizes as lacking a unifying theory and failing to preserve the rights guaranteed by the Amendment. Professor Cloud's solution is a return to the theories espoused by the Supreme Court during the infamous Lochner era of the early twentieth century. He calls for a merging of the formalist and pragmatist theories of that period into an interpretive theory of the Fourth Amendment and suggests a rededication to the Amendment's Warrant Clause. Such a theory avoids the pitfalls of literalism and judicially determined social policy, while protecting the basic purposes of the Amendment to protect individual liberty, privacy, and property and to prevent unjustified government intrusions.","PeriodicalId":413978,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Judges (Criminal Procedure) (Topic)","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Fourth Amendment During the Lochner Era: Privacy, Property, and Liberty in Constitutional Theory\",\"authors\":\"Morgan Cloud\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/1229278\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, Professor Morgan Cloud proposes a surprising remedy for a Fourth Amendment jurisprudence he criticizes as lacking a unifying theory and failing to preserve the rights guaranteed by the Amendment. Professor Cloud's solution is a return to the theories espoused by the Supreme Court during the infamous Lochner era of the early twentieth century. He calls for a merging of the formalist and pragmatist theories of that period into an interpretive theory of the Fourth Amendment and suggests a rededication to the Amendment's Warrant Clause. Such a theory avoids the pitfalls of literalism and judicially determined social policy, while protecting the basic purposes of the Amendment to protect individual liberty, privacy, and property and to prevent unjustified government intrusions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":413978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Judges (Criminal Procedure) (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Judges (Criminal Procedure) (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/1229278\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Judges (Criminal Procedure) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1229278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

在这篇文章中,摩根·克劳德教授提出了一个令人惊讶的补救办法,他批评第四修正案的法理学缺乏统一的理论,未能维护修正案所保障的权利。克劳德教授的解决方案是回归到最高法院在20世纪早期臭名昭著的洛克纳时代所支持的理论。他呼吁将那个时期的形式主义和实用主义理论合并为第四修正案的解释理论,并建议重新致力于修正案的授权条款。这样的理论避免了字面主义和司法决定的社会政策的陷阱,同时保护了修正案的基本目的,即保护个人自由、隐私和财产,防止不合理的政府入侵。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Fourth Amendment During the Lochner Era: Privacy, Property, and Liberty in Constitutional Theory
In this article, Professor Morgan Cloud proposes a surprising remedy for a Fourth Amendment jurisprudence he criticizes as lacking a unifying theory and failing to preserve the rights guaranteed by the Amendment. Professor Cloud's solution is a return to the theories espoused by the Supreme Court during the infamous Lochner era of the early twentieth century. He calls for a merging of the formalist and pragmatist theories of that period into an interpretive theory of the Fourth Amendment and suggests a rededication to the Amendment's Warrant Clause. Such a theory avoids the pitfalls of literalism and judicially determined social policy, while protecting the basic purposes of the Amendment to protect individual liberty, privacy, and property and to prevent unjustified government intrusions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fact Suppression and the Subversion of Capital Punishment: What Death Penalty Foes on the Supreme Court and in the Media Do Not Want the Public to Know The Fourth Amendment During the Lochner Era: Privacy, Property, and Liberty in Constitutional Theory The Promise of Trailing-Edge Guidelines to Resolve the Conflict between Uniformity and Judicial Discretion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1