{"title":"第五回历世纪delilil<e:1> l'n-Nubuvva的传统:卡迪·阿卜杜勒·贾巴尔和Bayhāqī的样本","authors":"H. Akbaş","doi":"10.20860/ijoses.1177582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The defensive reflex developed by Muslim scholars in order to eliminate the protest to the prophethood of Muhammad paved the way for the formation of the tradition that ıt’s called dalāılu'n-nubuvva in the historical process that the different religious and philosophical movements get involved in the Islamic society. This tradition which first started to come into existence with the efforts of Muʽtazilī scholars developed and continued its existence by the work of Salafist thinkers and hadith scholars. These developments made it possible for different methods naturally to emerge in the proof of prophecy. As a matter of fact that in addition to the wisdom and transmission-centered attitude developed by the Muʽtazila section has emerged a approach of narrator that only focuses on the transmission-centered. In this context, the work of Kadı Abd al-Jabbar who is known as Muʽtazilī scholar that its name \"Tesbitu Dalāilu'n-Nubuvva\" and the work of Bayhāqī who is muhaddith scholar that is name \"Dalāilu'n-Nubuvva\" was designed to prove the prophethood of Muhammad in the fifth century of the hijra by copyrighted using two different methods. In this study, we are planning to introduce and compare with outlines the two works of delâil authors who had methodical differences in the 5th century hijri. In addition, we think that by giving information about the lives of the authors, the method differences will become more understandable through the process and intellectual environment of these two authors.","PeriodicalId":227931,"journal":{"name":"Uluslararası Sosyal ve Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A tradition of Delâilül'n-Nubuvva in the 5th Hijri Century: The Sample of Qadi Abd-al-Jabbar and Bayhāqī\",\"authors\":\"H. Akbaş\",\"doi\":\"10.20860/ijoses.1177582\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The defensive reflex developed by Muslim scholars in order to eliminate the protest to the prophethood of Muhammad paved the way for the formation of the tradition that ıt’s called dalāılu'n-nubuvva in the historical process that the different religious and philosophical movements get involved in the Islamic society. This tradition which first started to come into existence with the efforts of Muʽtazilī scholars developed and continued its existence by the work of Salafist thinkers and hadith scholars. These developments made it possible for different methods naturally to emerge in the proof of prophecy. As a matter of fact that in addition to the wisdom and transmission-centered attitude developed by the Muʽtazila section has emerged a approach of narrator that only focuses on the transmission-centered. In this context, the work of Kadı Abd al-Jabbar who is known as Muʽtazilī scholar that its name \\\"Tesbitu Dalāilu'n-Nubuvva\\\" and the work of Bayhāqī who is muhaddith scholar that is name \\\"Dalāilu'n-Nubuvva\\\" was designed to prove the prophethood of Muhammad in the fifth century of the hijra by copyrighted using two different methods. In this study, we are planning to introduce and compare with outlines the two works of delâil authors who had methodical differences in the 5th century hijri. In addition, we think that by giving information about the lives of the authors, the method differences will become more understandable through the process and intellectual environment of these two authors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":227931,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Uluslararası Sosyal ve Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Uluslararası Sosyal ve Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20860/ijoses.1177582\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Uluslararası Sosyal ve Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20860/ijoses.1177582","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
穆斯林学者为了消除对穆罕默德先知身份的抗议而形成的防御反射为传统的形成铺平了道路ıt被称为dalāılu'n-nubuvva在不同宗教和哲学运动参与伊斯兰社会的历史过程中。这一传统首先在Mu æ tazili学者的努力下开始存在,并通过萨拉菲斯特思想家和圣训学者的工作发展并继续存在。这些发展使得不同的方法自然地出现在预言的证明中成为可能。事实上,除了智慧和以传播为中心的态度由Mu, tazila部分发展出来之外,还出现了一种叙述者的方法,只关注以传播为中心。在这种情况下,kadyi Abd al-Jabbar的作品,被称为Mu æ tazili学者,其名称为“Tesbitu Dalāilu'n-Nubuvva”,以及Bayhāqī的作品,他是圣训学者,其名称为“Dalāilu'n-Nubuvva”,旨在证明穆罕默德在五世纪的先知身份,通过两种不同的方法获得版权。在本研究中,我们计划介绍并比较在5世纪的hijri中有方法差异的delisil作者的两部作品。此外,我们认为,通过对两位作者的生活进行介绍,通过两位作者的过程和智力环境,可以更好地理解方法上的差异。
A tradition of Delâilül'n-Nubuvva in the 5th Hijri Century: The Sample of Qadi Abd-al-Jabbar and Bayhāqī
The defensive reflex developed by Muslim scholars in order to eliminate the protest to the prophethood of Muhammad paved the way for the formation of the tradition that ıt’s called dalāılu'n-nubuvva in the historical process that the different religious and philosophical movements get involved in the Islamic society. This tradition which first started to come into existence with the efforts of Muʽtazilī scholars developed and continued its existence by the work of Salafist thinkers and hadith scholars. These developments made it possible for different methods naturally to emerge in the proof of prophecy. As a matter of fact that in addition to the wisdom and transmission-centered attitude developed by the Muʽtazila section has emerged a approach of narrator that only focuses on the transmission-centered. In this context, the work of Kadı Abd al-Jabbar who is known as Muʽtazilī scholar that its name "Tesbitu Dalāilu'n-Nubuvva" and the work of Bayhāqī who is muhaddith scholar that is name "Dalāilu'n-Nubuvva" was designed to prove the prophethood of Muhammad in the fifth century of the hijra by copyrighted using two different methods. In this study, we are planning to introduce and compare with outlines the two works of delâil authors who had methodical differences in the 5th century hijri. In addition, we think that by giving information about the lives of the authors, the method differences will become more understandable through the process and intellectual environment of these two authors.