Zulham Andi Ritonga, Ali Sabela Hasibuan, Tasya Adinda Putri
{"title":"Analisis Kualitatif Pengisian Rekam Medis Rawat Inap Di Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah Kabupaten Aceh Tamiang Tahun 2022","authors":"Zulham Andi Ritonga, Ali Sabela Hasibuan, Tasya Adinda Putri","doi":"10.52943/jipiki.v8i1.1228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Completeness of filling out medical records in hospitals is a must for health workers and can be done using qualitative analysis. The purpose of this study was to determine the qualitative analysis of filling in inpatient medical records at the Aceh Tamiang District General Hospital. This research is a descriptive research with a quantitative approach. The research was conducted at the Aceh Tamiang District Hospital. The population in this study was 1,840 and the sample obtained was 95 inpatient medical records. The results showed that the review of the completeness and consistency of the diagnosis was 90 (95%) accurate and 5 (5%) inaccurate, namely in the inpatient doctor's notes. In the notes and nursing care and nursing diagnoses there were 87 (92%) complete and 8 (8%) incomplete. Review of the consistency of recording the diagnosis, there were 85 (89%) complete and 10 (11%) incomplete. There are 83 medical records (87%) accurate and 12 (13%) inaccurate. Incomplete and inaccurate filling of inpatient medical records is found in the consistency of development records and nursing care. There were 82 (86%) complete and 13 (14%) incomplete records of things that were carried out during treatment and treatment, namely on evidence of implementation of treatment plans, instructions and drug changes, and actions taken which were filled out by nurses. Review of informed consent from 16 inpatient medical records, there were 14 (87%) complete and 2 (13%) incomplete, namely the completeness of the contents of the informed consent filled out by nurses. Review of medical methods or practices, there are 84 (88%) complete and 11 (12%) incomplete, namely on the date and time, the signature / initials is easy to read filled in by the doctor","PeriodicalId":261208,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ilmiah Perekam dan Informasi Kesehatan Imelda (JIPIKI)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ilmiah Perekam dan Informasi Kesehatan Imelda (JIPIKI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52943/jipiki.v8i1.1228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

医院医疗记录填写的完整性对卫生工作者来说是必须的,可以使用定性分析来完成。本研究的目的是确定亚齐Tamiang地区总医院住院病历填写的定性分析。本研究是一种定量方法的描述性研究。这项研究是在亚齐Tamiang地区医院进行的。本研究的人口为1840人,获得的样本为95份住院病历。结果显示,在住院医生的病历中,对诊断的完整性和一致性的评价准确率为90(95%),不准确性为5(5%)。在笔记、护理和护理诊断中,完整的87例(92%),不完整的8例(8%)。回顾记录诊断的一致性,85例(89%)完整,10例(11%)不完整。83份医疗记录(87%)准确,12份(13%)不准确。住院病历填写不完整、不准确的情况存在于病历发展与护理的一致性中。护理人员填写的治疗和治疗过程中进行的事情记录完整的有82例(86%),不完整的有13例(14%)。回顾16份住院患者病历的知情同意书,有14份(87%)填写完整,2份(13%)填写不完整,即护士填写的知情同意书内容完整。对医疗方法或做法的审查,有84份(88%)完整,11份(12%)不完整,即在日期和时间上,签名/首字母易于阅读,由医生填写
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analisis Kualitatif Pengisian Rekam Medis Rawat Inap Di Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah Kabupaten Aceh Tamiang Tahun 2022
Completeness of filling out medical records in hospitals is a must for health workers and can be done using qualitative analysis. The purpose of this study was to determine the qualitative analysis of filling in inpatient medical records at the Aceh Tamiang District General Hospital. This research is a descriptive research with a quantitative approach. The research was conducted at the Aceh Tamiang District Hospital. The population in this study was 1,840 and the sample obtained was 95 inpatient medical records. The results showed that the review of the completeness and consistency of the diagnosis was 90 (95%) accurate and 5 (5%) inaccurate, namely in the inpatient doctor's notes. In the notes and nursing care and nursing diagnoses there were 87 (92%) complete and 8 (8%) incomplete. Review of the consistency of recording the diagnosis, there were 85 (89%) complete and 10 (11%) incomplete. There are 83 medical records (87%) accurate and 12 (13%) inaccurate. Incomplete and inaccurate filling of inpatient medical records is found in the consistency of development records and nursing care. There were 82 (86%) complete and 13 (14%) incomplete records of things that were carried out during treatment and treatment, namely on evidence of implementation of treatment plans, instructions and drug changes, and actions taken which were filled out by nurses. Review of informed consent from 16 inpatient medical records, there were 14 (87%) complete and 2 (13%) incomplete, namely the completeness of the contents of the informed consent filled out by nurses. Review of medical methods or practices, there are 84 (88%) complete and 11 (12%) incomplete, namely on the date and time, the signature / initials is easy to read filled in by the doctor
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tinjauan Pelaksanaan Penyusutan dan Pemusnahan Rekam Medis di RSUD Muntilan Tinjauan Perancangan Tracer (Outguide) Pada Unit Penyimpanan Rekam Medis Di RSU Imelda Pekerja Indonesia Tahun 2022 Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Pelayanan Kesehatan Terhadap Kepuasan Pasien Rawat Inap Di RSUD DR. R.M. Djoelham Binjai Tahun 2022 Analisis Faktor Penyebab Pending Klaim Rawat Inap Akibat Koding Rekam Medis Di Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah (RSUD) Dr. Soedirman Kebumen Comparison of Community Satisfaction with Health Services at Accredited Health Centers in North Sumatra
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1