美国证券交易委员会公布股票类别选择披露计划的结果

Brenden Carroll, M. Perlow, Christine Ayako Schleppegrell, Samuel Scarritt-Selman
{"title":"美国证券交易委员会公布股票类别选择披露计划的结果","authors":"Brenden Carroll, M. Perlow, Christine Ayako Schleppegrell, Samuel Scarritt-Selman","doi":"10.1108/joic-08-2019-0047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nTo explain the SEC’s Share Class Selection Disclosure Initiative (SCSD Initiative), the purpose it seeks to serve, the results it has generated, and its broader implications for the asset management industry.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nExplains the newly announced results of the SEC’s Share Class Selection Disclosure Initiative. Provides background on the principles underlying the initiative, the mechanics by which the initiative’s self-reporting program operated, and industry reaction to the initiative. Analyzes the results the initiative generated, in terms of both aggregate disgorgement and the terms of settlement offered to self-reporting advisers. Draws conclusions and provides key takeaways.\n\n\nFindings\nAlthough the terms of the actual settlements were consistent with the framework of standardized settlement terms set forth in the SCSD Initiative, whether the standardized terms of settlement offered under the SCSD Initiative ultimately will be viewed as favorable will depend in large part upon how the SEC continues to treat advisers that did not self-report.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nExpert analysis from experienced lawyers in the mutual fund and investment advisory industries.\n","PeriodicalId":399186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investment Compliance","volume":"88 3 Pt 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SEC announces results of share class selection disclosure initiative\",\"authors\":\"Brenden Carroll, M. Perlow, Christine Ayako Schleppegrell, Samuel Scarritt-Selman\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/joic-08-2019-0047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nTo explain the SEC’s Share Class Selection Disclosure Initiative (SCSD Initiative), the purpose it seeks to serve, the results it has generated, and its broader implications for the asset management industry.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nExplains the newly announced results of the SEC’s Share Class Selection Disclosure Initiative. Provides background on the principles underlying the initiative, the mechanics by which the initiative’s self-reporting program operated, and industry reaction to the initiative. Analyzes the results the initiative generated, in terms of both aggregate disgorgement and the terms of settlement offered to self-reporting advisers. Draws conclusions and provides key takeaways.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nAlthough the terms of the actual settlements were consistent with the framework of standardized settlement terms set forth in the SCSD Initiative, whether the standardized terms of settlement offered under the SCSD Initiative ultimately will be viewed as favorable will depend in large part upon how the SEC continues to treat advisers that did not self-report.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nExpert analysis from experienced lawyers in the mutual fund and investment advisory industries.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":399186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Investment Compliance\",\"volume\":\"88 3 Pt 2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Investment Compliance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/joic-08-2019-0047\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investment Compliance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/joic-08-2019-0047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的解释美国证券交易委员会的股票类别选择披露倡议(SCSD倡议),它寻求服务的目的,它产生的结果,以及它对资产管理行业的更广泛影响。设计/方法/方法解释美国证券交易委员会股票类别选择披露计划最新公布的结果。提供关于计划的基础原则的背景,计划的自我报告程序运行的机制,以及行业对计划的反应。从总分类和向自我报告顾问提供的结算条件两方面分析该倡议产生的结果。得出结论并提供关键要点。尽管实际和解条款与SCSD倡议中规定的标准化和解条款框架一致,但SCSD倡议下提供的标准化和解条款最终是否被视为有利,将在很大程度上取决于SEC如何继续对待那些没有自我报告的顾问。创意/价值来自共同基金和投资咨询行业经验丰富的律师的专家分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SEC announces results of share class selection disclosure initiative
Purpose To explain the SEC’s Share Class Selection Disclosure Initiative (SCSD Initiative), the purpose it seeks to serve, the results it has generated, and its broader implications for the asset management industry. Design/methodology/approach Explains the newly announced results of the SEC’s Share Class Selection Disclosure Initiative. Provides background on the principles underlying the initiative, the mechanics by which the initiative’s self-reporting program operated, and industry reaction to the initiative. Analyzes the results the initiative generated, in terms of both aggregate disgorgement and the terms of settlement offered to self-reporting advisers. Draws conclusions and provides key takeaways. Findings Although the terms of the actual settlements were consistent with the framework of standardized settlement terms set forth in the SCSD Initiative, whether the standardized terms of settlement offered under the SCSD Initiative ultimately will be viewed as favorable will depend in large part upon how the SEC continues to treat advisers that did not self-report. Originality/value Expert analysis from experienced lawyers in the mutual fund and investment advisory industries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ESG litigation – how companies can get ready, respond and resolve claims Strengthening AML/CFT controls of digital payment token service providers in Singapore Understanding regulatory trends: digital assets & anti-Money laundering “Racing” to the IBOR transition finish line Structuring and financing private equity and venture capital transactions in Luxembourg
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1