论乌克兰刑法中刑事侵害正义罪的客体问题

V. Hryshchuk, Lidiia Paliukh
{"title":"论乌克兰刑法中刑事侵害正义罪的客体问题","authors":"V. Hryshchuk, Lidiia Paliukh","doi":"10.37491/unz.83.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article formulates some initial conceptual provisions regarding the content of the generic object of criminal offenses against justice. In particular, the authors have defined the main groups of public relations which should be protected by the norms of the section on liability for criminal offenses against justice, based on the legal nature of these relations. It is substantiated that procedural activity, at whatever stage of the proceedings it is carried out, has a single task, regulated by a single procedural legislation. Therefore, it is impossible to divide the criminal law protection of these relations into the norms of different sections of the Special Part of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. It is argued that the activity of judicial proceedings and the activity of execution of court decisions are inextricably linked, which determines the expediency of their criminal protection by the rules of one section of the Special Part of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. Accordingly, it seems appropriate to define the generic object of criminal offenses against justice as «public relations that ensure the procedure established by law for the administration of justice and the execution of court decisions». It is substantiated that public relations regarding the jurisdictional activity of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine, given the legal nature of this body, are components of the generic object of criminal offenses against justice. In particular, this conclusion is based on such a defining characteristic of this body as that it is a specific judicial body, not included into the system of courts of general jurisdiction, which combines the functions of justice, constitutional control, official interpretation of the Constitution of Ukraine, protection of constitutional rights and freedoms of the individual. The generic object of criminal offenses against justice does not cover organizational and managerial relations arising in connection with the exercise of judicial power, including the jurisdictional activities of the High Council of Justice.","PeriodicalId":106913,"journal":{"name":"University Scientific Notes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Issue of the Object of Criminal Offenses against Justice under the Criminal Law of Ukraine\",\"authors\":\"V. Hryshchuk, Lidiia Paliukh\",\"doi\":\"10.37491/unz.83.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article formulates some initial conceptual provisions regarding the content of the generic object of criminal offenses against justice. In particular, the authors have defined the main groups of public relations which should be protected by the norms of the section on liability for criminal offenses against justice, based on the legal nature of these relations. It is substantiated that procedural activity, at whatever stage of the proceedings it is carried out, has a single task, regulated by a single procedural legislation. Therefore, it is impossible to divide the criminal law protection of these relations into the norms of different sections of the Special Part of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. It is argued that the activity of judicial proceedings and the activity of execution of court decisions are inextricably linked, which determines the expediency of their criminal protection by the rules of one section of the Special Part of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. Accordingly, it seems appropriate to define the generic object of criminal offenses against justice as «public relations that ensure the procedure established by law for the administration of justice and the execution of court decisions». It is substantiated that public relations regarding the jurisdictional activity of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine, given the legal nature of this body, are components of the generic object of criminal offenses against justice. In particular, this conclusion is based on such a defining characteristic of this body as that it is a specific judicial body, not included into the system of courts of general jurisdiction, which combines the functions of justice, constitutional control, official interpretation of the Constitution of Ukraine, protection of constitutional rights and freedoms of the individual. The generic object of criminal offenses against justice does not cover organizational and managerial relations arising in connection with the exercise of judicial power, including the jurisdictional activities of the High Council of Justice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":106913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University Scientific Notes\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University Scientific Notes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37491/unz.83.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University Scientific Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37491/unz.83.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文对刑事侵害司法犯罪一般客体的内容作了初步的概念性规定。特别是,作者根据公共关系的法律性质,确定了危害司法的刑事犯罪责任这一节应受规范保护的主要公共关系群体。事实证明,程序性活动,无论在诉讼的哪个阶段进行,都只有一项任务,由一项程序性立法加以规定。因此,不可能将这些关系的刑法保护划分为乌克兰刑法特别部分不同章节的规范。有人认为,司法程序的活动和法院判决的执行活动是不可分割地联系在一起的,这决定了乌克兰《刑法》特别部分某一节的规则对它们的刑事保护的权宜性。因此,将危害司法的刑事犯罪的一般对象定义为“确保法律为司法行政和执行法院判决所规定的程序的公共关系”似乎是适当的。事实证明,鉴于乌克兰宪法法院的法律性质,有关该机构管辖权活动的公共关系是危害司法的刑事犯罪的一般对象的组成部分。特别是,这一结论的根据是该机构的一个决定性特征,即它是一个特殊的司法机构,不包括在具有一般管辖权的法院系统之内,该系统集司法、宪法监督、对乌克兰宪法的正式解释、保护宪法权利和个人自由的职能于一身。危害司法的刑事犯罪的一般对象不包括与行使司法权有关的组织和管理关系,包括高级司法委员会的管辖活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On the Issue of the Object of Criminal Offenses against Justice under the Criminal Law of Ukraine
The article formulates some initial conceptual provisions regarding the content of the generic object of criminal offenses against justice. In particular, the authors have defined the main groups of public relations which should be protected by the norms of the section on liability for criminal offenses against justice, based on the legal nature of these relations. It is substantiated that procedural activity, at whatever stage of the proceedings it is carried out, has a single task, regulated by a single procedural legislation. Therefore, it is impossible to divide the criminal law protection of these relations into the norms of different sections of the Special Part of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. It is argued that the activity of judicial proceedings and the activity of execution of court decisions are inextricably linked, which determines the expediency of their criminal protection by the rules of one section of the Special Part of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. Accordingly, it seems appropriate to define the generic object of criminal offenses against justice as «public relations that ensure the procedure established by law for the administration of justice and the execution of court decisions». It is substantiated that public relations regarding the jurisdictional activity of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine, given the legal nature of this body, are components of the generic object of criminal offenses against justice. In particular, this conclusion is based on such a defining characteristic of this body as that it is a specific judicial body, not included into the system of courts of general jurisdiction, which combines the functions of justice, constitutional control, official interpretation of the Constitution of Ukraine, protection of constitutional rights and freedoms of the individual. The generic object of criminal offenses against justice does not cover organizational and managerial relations arising in connection with the exercise of judicial power, including the jurisdictional activities of the High Council of Justice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modern Trends In The Reform Of The Legal Status Of Farms In Ukraine Features Of The Protection Of Rights To A Logo As An Industrial Design: Ukrainian And Foreign Dimensions Automatic Mode Of Consideration Of Administrative Cases As A Form Of Administrative Proceedings In Relation Of Administrative Procedure Legislative Regulation Of Forensic Expert Activity In Ukraine Theoretical And Applied Aspects Of Modern Business Etiquette Of Tourist Organizations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1