在视频内容分享网站中,观众评论作为教育注释

Penny Thompson
{"title":"在视频内容分享网站中,观众评论作为教育注释","authors":"Penny Thompson","doi":"10.1504/IJSMILE.2013.053598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although online video sharing sites are often viewed as contributors to a decline in students’ reading, these sites may also have the potential to enhance learning. Content sharing sites that contain viewer comments along with thought-provoking video lecture may provide a particularly rich source of instructional materials. To explore this potential, four discussion forums from the TED website were analysed at two levels. The first level provided a description of the types of comments that were prevalent in the discussion and indicated that clarifications, interpretations, and question were the most common types of substantive posts. The second level used Cognitive Flexibility Theory as a framework, and found that these forums contained open, expansive comments that could counteract common categories of oversimplification. These results suggest that freely available websites such as TED contain materials that could facilitate learning while capitalising on the intrinsic appeal of videos and social media.","PeriodicalId":275398,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Soc. Media Interact. Learn. Environ.","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Viewer comments as educational annotation in video content sharing sites\",\"authors\":\"Penny Thompson\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/IJSMILE.2013.053598\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although online video sharing sites are often viewed as contributors to a decline in students’ reading, these sites may also have the potential to enhance learning. Content sharing sites that contain viewer comments along with thought-provoking video lecture may provide a particularly rich source of instructional materials. To explore this potential, four discussion forums from the TED website were analysed at two levels. The first level provided a description of the types of comments that were prevalent in the discussion and indicated that clarifications, interpretations, and question were the most common types of substantive posts. The second level used Cognitive Flexibility Theory as a framework, and found that these forums contained open, expansive comments that could counteract common categories of oversimplification. These results suggest that freely available websites such as TED contain materials that could facilitate learning while capitalising on the intrinsic appeal of videos and social media.\",\"PeriodicalId\":275398,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Int. J. Soc. Media Interact. Learn. Environ.\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Int. J. Soc. Media Interact. Learn. Environ.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSMILE.2013.053598\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Soc. Media Interact. Learn. Environ.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSMILE.2013.053598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

尽管在线视频分享网站经常被视为导致学生阅读能力下降的原因,但这些网站也可能有促进学习的潜力。内容共享网站包含观众的评论以及发人深省的视频讲座,可以提供特别丰富的教学材料来源。为了探索这一潜力,我们从两个层面分析了TED网站上的四个论坛。第一级说明了讨论中普遍存在的评论类型,并指出澄清、解释和提问是最常见的实质性员额类型。第二个层次使用认知灵活性理论作为框架,发现这些论坛包含开放、广泛的评论,可以抵消常见的过度简化类别。这些结果表明,像TED这样的免费网站包含的材料可以促进学习,同时利用视频和社交媒体的内在吸引力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Viewer comments as educational annotation in video content sharing sites
Although online video sharing sites are often viewed as contributors to a decline in students’ reading, these sites may also have the potential to enhance learning. Content sharing sites that contain viewer comments along with thought-provoking video lecture may provide a particularly rich source of instructional materials. To explore this potential, four discussion forums from the TED website were analysed at two levels. The first level provided a description of the types of comments that were prevalent in the discussion and indicated that clarifications, interpretations, and question were the most common types of substantive posts. The second level used Cognitive Flexibility Theory as a framework, and found that these forums contained open, expansive comments that could counteract common categories of oversimplification. These results suggest that freely available websites such as TED contain materials that could facilitate learning while capitalising on the intrinsic appeal of videos and social media.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How to change the world: the relationship between social media and social change in the classroom Learning ecologies in online language learning social networks: a netnographic study of EFL learners using italki Most versus least used social media: undergraduate students' preferences, participation, lurking, and motivational factors Star Wars science on social media! Using pop culture to improve STEM skills Applying a modified technology acceptance model to qualitatively analyse the factors affecting microblogging integration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1