卵巢反应预测指数与抗勒氏激素、窦卵泡计数作为IVF/ICSI周期女性卵巢反应预测指标的比较研究

A. H. Amin, Nadeen Sherif, A. Askalani, Shaza SaadAlla
{"title":"卵巢反应预测指数与抗<s:1>勒氏激素、窦卵泡计数作为IVF/ICSI周期女性卵巢反应预测指标的比较研究","authors":"A. H. Amin, Nadeen Sherif, A. Askalani, Shaza SaadAlla","doi":"10.21608/ebwhj.2019.17205.1020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim to compare individual predictors as AMH, AFC versus the ovarian response prediction index in determining the ovarian response to controlled ovarian stimulation Methods A prospective cohort study conducted on 84 infertile couples candidate for Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for the first time using either long agonist or antagonist protocol according to clinical evaluation. Participants were classified according to the number of MII oocytes into poor response with 3 or less oocytes and normal responders with 4 or more oocytesResults Women with poor response were statistically older than those with normal ovarian response (33.1±5.9 vs. 29.8±5.4 respectively).The number of cumulus (12.1±5.2 vs. 2.5±1.5) , MII oocytes (7.8±3.6 vs. 2±0.8), grade A embryos (3±0.8 vs. 1.4±0.9) and total number of embryos (3.8±2.2 vs. 1.7±0.7) were significantly higher in normal responders .ORPI has the highest accuracy n predicting ovarian response (88%) when compared to AMH (83%)and AFC (86%) .Conclusion AMH, AFC and ORPI are good predictive of the ovarian response and help in choosing the protocol and gonadotropin dose of induction and prediction of OHSS.","PeriodicalId":224226,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Womenʼs Health Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study between ovarian response prediction index versus anti-Müllerian hormone, antral follicular count as predictors of ovarian response in women undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles\",\"authors\":\"A. H. Amin, Nadeen Sherif, A. Askalani, Shaza SaadAlla\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/ebwhj.2019.17205.1020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim to compare individual predictors as AMH, AFC versus the ovarian response prediction index in determining the ovarian response to controlled ovarian stimulation Methods A prospective cohort study conducted on 84 infertile couples candidate for Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for the first time using either long agonist or antagonist protocol according to clinical evaluation. Participants were classified according to the number of MII oocytes into poor response with 3 or less oocytes and normal responders with 4 or more oocytesResults Women with poor response were statistically older than those with normal ovarian response (33.1±5.9 vs. 29.8±5.4 respectively).The number of cumulus (12.1±5.2 vs. 2.5±1.5) , MII oocytes (7.8±3.6 vs. 2±0.8), grade A embryos (3±0.8 vs. 1.4±0.9) and total number of embryos (3.8±2.2 vs. 1.7±0.7) were significantly higher in normal responders .ORPI has the highest accuracy n predicting ovarian response (88%) when compared to AMH (83%)and AFC (86%) .Conclusion AMH, AFC and ORPI are good predictive of the ovarian response and help in choosing the protocol and gonadotropin dose of induction and prediction of OHSS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":224226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence Based Womenʼs Health Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence Based Womenʼs Health Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/ebwhj.2019.17205.1020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence Based Womenʼs Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ebwhj.2019.17205.1020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的比较AMH、AFC与卵巢反应预测指数等个体预测指标对卵巢对控制性卵巢刺激反应的影响。方法对84对首次接受卵胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)的不育夫妇进行前瞻性队列研究,根据临床评价采用长效激动剂或拮抗剂方案。根据MII卵母细胞的数量将参与者分为3个及以下的不良反应和4个及以上的正常反应。结果不良反应的女性比卵巢正常反应的女性年龄大(分别为33.1±5.9∶29.8±5.4)。正常反应者的卵丘数(12.1±5.2 vs. 2.5±1.5)、MII卵母细胞数(7.8±3.6 vs. 2±0.8)、A级胚胎数(3±0.8 vs. 1.4±0.9)和胚胎总数(3.8±2.2 vs. 1.7±0.7)显著高于正常反应者,ORPI预测卵巢反应的准确率(88%)高于AMH(83%)和AFC(86%)。结论AMH、AFC和ORPI对卵巢反应有较好的预测效果,有助于选择诱导和预测OHSS的方案和促性腺激素剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative study between ovarian response prediction index versus anti-Müllerian hormone, antral follicular count as predictors of ovarian response in women undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles
Aim to compare individual predictors as AMH, AFC versus the ovarian response prediction index in determining the ovarian response to controlled ovarian stimulation Methods A prospective cohort study conducted on 84 infertile couples candidate for Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for the first time using either long agonist or antagonist protocol according to clinical evaluation. Participants were classified according to the number of MII oocytes into poor response with 3 or less oocytes and normal responders with 4 or more oocytesResults Women with poor response were statistically older than those with normal ovarian response (33.1±5.9 vs. 29.8±5.4 respectively).The number of cumulus (12.1±5.2 vs. 2.5±1.5) , MII oocytes (7.8±3.6 vs. 2±0.8), grade A embryos (3±0.8 vs. 1.4±0.9) and total number of embryos (3.8±2.2 vs. 1.7±0.7) were significantly higher in normal responders .ORPI has the highest accuracy n predicting ovarian response (88%) when compared to AMH (83%)and AFC (86%) .Conclusion AMH, AFC and ORPI are good predictive of the ovarian response and help in choosing the protocol and gonadotropin dose of induction and prediction of OHSS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hysteroscopy as a diagnostic tool in women with recurrent pregnancy loss, a prospective randomized controlled study Serum Soluble Endoglin Versus Serum Placental Growth Factor for Early Prediction of Preeclampsia Cervical cerclage for Pregnant Women at High-risk of Recurrent Preterm Birth can act beyond its Mechanical Action New ultrasound signs for prediction of early placental Insufficiency Efficacy and Safety of Preoperative Intravenous Tranexamic Acid to Reduce Blood Loss During and After Elective Lower‐Segment Cesarean Delivery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1