荷兰语推文的可变性。对偏差词标记的比例的估计

H. V. Halteren, N. Oostdijk
{"title":"荷兰语推文的可变性。对偏差词标记的比例的估计","authors":"H. V. Halteren, N. Oostdijk","doi":"10.21248/jlcl.29.2014.191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we attempt to estimate which proportion of the word tokens in Dutch tweets are not covered by standard resources and can therefore be expected to cause problems for standard NLP applications. We fully annotated and analysed a small pilot corpus. We also used the corpus to calibrate automatic estimation procedures for proportions of non-word tokens and of out-of-vocabulary words, after which we applied these procedures to about 2 billion Dutch tweets. We find that the proportion of possibly problematic tokens is so high (e.g. an estimate of 15% of the words being problematic in the full tweet collection, and the annotated sample with death-threat-related tweets showing problematic words in three out of four tweets) that any NLP application designed/created for standard Dutch can be expected to be seriously hampered in its processing. We suggest a few approaches to alleviate the problem, but none of them will solve the problem completely.","PeriodicalId":402489,"journal":{"name":"J. Lang. Technol. Comput. Linguistics","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variability in Dutch Tweets. An estimate of the proportion of deviant word tokens\",\"authors\":\"H. V. Halteren, N. Oostdijk\",\"doi\":\"10.21248/jlcl.29.2014.191\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we attempt to estimate which proportion of the word tokens in Dutch tweets are not covered by standard resources and can therefore be expected to cause problems for standard NLP applications. We fully annotated and analysed a small pilot corpus. We also used the corpus to calibrate automatic estimation procedures for proportions of non-word tokens and of out-of-vocabulary words, after which we applied these procedures to about 2 billion Dutch tweets. We find that the proportion of possibly problematic tokens is so high (e.g. an estimate of 15% of the words being problematic in the full tweet collection, and the annotated sample with death-threat-related tweets showing problematic words in three out of four tweets) that any NLP application designed/created for standard Dutch can be expected to be seriously hampered in its processing. We suggest a few approaches to alleviate the problem, but none of them will solve the problem completely.\",\"PeriodicalId\":402489,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"J. Lang. Technol. Comput. Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"J. Lang. Technol. Comput. Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21248/jlcl.29.2014.191\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Lang. Technol. Comput. Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21248/jlcl.29.2014.191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

在本文中,我们试图估计荷兰语推文中有多少比例的词令牌没有被标准资源覆盖,因此可能会对标准NLP应用程序造成问题。我们完全注释和分析了一个小的试点语料库。我们还使用语料库校准非单词标记和词汇外单词比例的自动估计程序,之后我们将这些程序应用于大约20亿条荷兰语推文。我们发现可能有问题的标记的比例如此之高(例如,在整个tweet集合中估计有15%的单词是有问题的,并且带有死亡威胁相关tweet的注释样本在四分之三的tweet中显示有问题的单词),任何为标准荷兰语设计/创建的NLP应用程序都可能在其处理中受到严重阻碍。我们提出了几种方法来缓解这个问题,但没有一种能彻底解决问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Variability in Dutch Tweets. An estimate of the proportion of deviant word tokens
In this paper, we attempt to estimate which proportion of the word tokens in Dutch tweets are not covered by standard resources and can therefore be expected to cause problems for standard NLP applications. We fully annotated and analysed a small pilot corpus. We also used the corpus to calibrate automatic estimation procedures for proportions of non-word tokens and of out-of-vocabulary words, after which we applied these procedures to about 2 billion Dutch tweets. We find that the proportion of possibly problematic tokens is so high (e.g. an estimate of 15% of the words being problematic in the full tweet collection, and the annotated sample with death-threat-related tweets showing problematic words in three out of four tweets) that any NLP application designed/created for standard Dutch can be expected to be seriously hampered in its processing. We suggest a few approaches to alleviate the problem, but none of them will solve the problem completely.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Aufbau eines Referenzkorpus zur deutschsprachigen internetbasierten Kommunikation als Zusatzkomponente für die Korpora im Projekt 'Digitales Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache' (DWDS) Crowdsourcing the OCR Ground Truth of a German and French Cultural Heritage Corpus Comparison of OCR Accuracy on Early Printed Books using the Open Source Engines Calamari and OCRopus Ground Truth for training OCR engines on historical documents in German Fraktur and Early Modern Latin Supervised OCR Error Detection and Correction Using Statistical and Neural Machine Translation Methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1