索取和勒索贿赂的国家责任:义务、障碍和机会

Bruce W. Klaw
{"title":"索取和勒索贿赂的国家责任:义务、障碍和机会","authors":"Bruce W. Klaw","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2298886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Article explores how bribery and extortion in international business transactions and foreign direct investment may be prevented by holding States accountable under international law, improving the viability of investor-State arbitration for corruption claims, and making appropriate use of State-to-State dispute resolution mechanisms like diplomatic protection. It examines the content of States' obligations to prevent and eradicate corruption and considers the conditions and circumstances under which a State may be held responsible under international law for the solicitation and extortion of bribes from foreign investors and the denial of justice to foreign investors subjected to such corruption. It then assesses the opportunities and obstacles currently associated with invoking State responsibility through investor-State arbitration and State-to-State dispute resolution mechanisms such as diplomatic protection. Based on this analysis, it offers a series of suggested improvements that should better enable these international dispute resolution mechanisms to help prevent corruption by encouraging the disclosure of it, securing redress for foreign investors subjected to it, and holding States accountable for it.","PeriodicalId":325917,"journal":{"name":"Berkeley Journal of International Law","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"State Responsibility for Bribe Solicitation and Extortion: Obligations, Obstacles, and Opportunities\",\"authors\":\"Bruce W. Klaw\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2298886\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This Article explores how bribery and extortion in international business transactions and foreign direct investment may be prevented by holding States accountable under international law, improving the viability of investor-State arbitration for corruption claims, and making appropriate use of State-to-State dispute resolution mechanisms like diplomatic protection. It examines the content of States' obligations to prevent and eradicate corruption and considers the conditions and circumstances under which a State may be held responsible under international law for the solicitation and extortion of bribes from foreign investors and the denial of justice to foreign investors subjected to such corruption. It then assesses the opportunities and obstacles currently associated with invoking State responsibility through investor-State arbitration and State-to-State dispute resolution mechanisms such as diplomatic protection. Based on this analysis, it offers a series of suggested improvements that should better enable these international dispute resolution mechanisms to help prevent corruption by encouraging the disclosure of it, securing redress for foreign investors subjected to it, and holding States accountable for it.\",\"PeriodicalId\":325917,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Berkeley Journal of International Law\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Berkeley Journal of International Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2298886\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berkeley Journal of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2298886","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文探讨了如何根据国际法追究国家的责任,提高投资者与国家之间就腐败索赔进行仲裁的可行性,以及适当利用外交保护等国与国之间的争端解决机制,从而防止国际商业交易和外国直接投资中的贿赂和敲诈勒索。它审查了各国预防和根除腐败的义务的内容,并审议了在何种条件和情况下,根据国际法,一国可能对向外国投资者索取和勒索贿赂以及对遭受这种腐败的外国投资者不给予司法公正负责。然后评估目前通过投资者-国家仲裁和国家-国家争端解决机制(如外交保护)援引国家责任所涉及的机会和障碍。根据这一分析,本报告提出了一系列改进建议,这些建议应能更好地使这些国际争端解决机制通过鼓励披露腐败、确保受到腐败影响的外国投资者得到补救和使各国对腐败负责来帮助防止腐败。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
State Responsibility for Bribe Solicitation and Extortion: Obligations, Obstacles, and Opportunities
This Article explores how bribery and extortion in international business transactions and foreign direct investment may be prevented by holding States accountable under international law, improving the viability of investor-State arbitration for corruption claims, and making appropriate use of State-to-State dispute resolution mechanisms like diplomatic protection. It examines the content of States' obligations to prevent and eradicate corruption and considers the conditions and circumstances under which a State may be held responsible under international law for the solicitation and extortion of bribes from foreign investors and the denial of justice to foreign investors subjected to such corruption. It then assesses the opportunities and obstacles currently associated with invoking State responsibility through investor-State arbitration and State-to-State dispute resolution mechanisms such as diplomatic protection. Based on this analysis, it offers a series of suggested improvements that should better enable these international dispute resolution mechanisms to help prevent corruption by encouraging the disclosure of it, securing redress for foreign investors subjected to it, and holding States accountable for it.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Maritime Interdiction of North Korean Ships under UN Sanctions The South China Sea as a Challenge to International Law and to International Legal Scholarship Back in the Game: International Humanitarian Lawmaking by States International Law and Corporate Participation in Times of Armed Conflict Reversing the Two Wrong Turns in the Economic Analysis of International Law: A Club Goods Theory of Treaty Membership & European Integration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1