交叉效率评价中基于共同权重的分组划分

Mengying Zhang, Qin Jin, Hongwei Liu
{"title":"交叉效率评价中基于共同权重的分组划分","authors":"Mengying Zhang, Qin Jin, Hongwei Liu","doi":"10.1504/IJIDS.2017.10007803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the traditional cross efficiency procedure, each decision making unit (DMU) offers a set of selfish weights to maximise its own efficiency. However, it is often not easy to be accepted by all other decision making units (DMUs). Since the cross efficiency of a DMU not only has a significant relevance with its own evaluation but also with other peer DMUs' measurement, a DMU may choose to cooperate or compete with some other DMUs to obtain a higher cross efficiency. Secondary-goal strategies, such as benevolent and aggressive strategies, have been applied in groups in which the relationship between each DMU is determined. With the benevolent strategy, all of the DMUs are under the situations of cooperation while they will compete with each other with the aggressive strategy. Obviously in reality, there is a situation in which alliances are often uncertain. Pure aggressive or benevolent strategy may be not suitable for the case. To solve this problem, the current paper proposes a new cross efficiency approach based on a series of common weights of each two DMUs. An example is given to illustrate our method.","PeriodicalId":303039,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Inf. Decis. Sci.","volume":"15 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Group division based on common weights in cross efficiency evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Mengying Zhang, Qin Jin, Hongwei Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/IJIDS.2017.10007803\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the traditional cross efficiency procedure, each decision making unit (DMU) offers a set of selfish weights to maximise its own efficiency. However, it is often not easy to be accepted by all other decision making units (DMUs). Since the cross efficiency of a DMU not only has a significant relevance with its own evaluation but also with other peer DMUs' measurement, a DMU may choose to cooperate or compete with some other DMUs to obtain a higher cross efficiency. Secondary-goal strategies, such as benevolent and aggressive strategies, have been applied in groups in which the relationship between each DMU is determined. With the benevolent strategy, all of the DMUs are under the situations of cooperation while they will compete with each other with the aggressive strategy. Obviously in reality, there is a situation in which alliances are often uncertain. Pure aggressive or benevolent strategy may be not suitable for the case. To solve this problem, the current paper proposes a new cross efficiency approach based on a series of common weights of each two DMUs. An example is given to illustrate our method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":303039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Int. J. Inf. Decis. Sci.\",\"volume\":\"15 4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Int. J. Inf. Decis. Sci.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIDS.2017.10007803\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Inf. Decis. Sci.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIDS.2017.10007803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在传统的交叉效率过程中,每个决策单元(DMU)提供一组自定义权值,以最大化其自身的效率。然而,它往往不容易被所有其他决策单位(dmu)所接受。由于DMU的交叉效率不仅与自身的评价有显著相关性,而且与其他同行DMU的测量结果也有显著相关性,因此DMU可能会选择与其他DMU合作或竞争以获得更高的交叉效率。次要目标策略,如仁慈和侵略性策略,已经应用于每个DMU之间关系确定的组中。在仁慈策略下,所有的dmu都处于合作状态,而在侵略性策略下,它们会相互竞争。显然,在现实中,联盟往往是不确定的。纯粹的侵略性或仁慈的策略可能不适合这种情况。为了解决这一问题,本文提出了一种基于两个dmu的一系列共同权重的交叉效率方法。给出了一个例子来说明我们的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Group division based on common weights in cross efficiency evaluation
In the traditional cross efficiency procedure, each decision making unit (DMU) offers a set of selfish weights to maximise its own efficiency. However, it is often not easy to be accepted by all other decision making units (DMUs). Since the cross efficiency of a DMU not only has a significant relevance with its own evaluation but also with other peer DMUs' measurement, a DMU may choose to cooperate or compete with some other DMUs to obtain a higher cross efficiency. Secondary-goal strategies, such as benevolent and aggressive strategies, have been applied in groups in which the relationship between each DMU is determined. With the benevolent strategy, all of the DMUs are under the situations of cooperation while they will compete with each other with the aggressive strategy. Obviously in reality, there is a situation in which alliances are often uncertain. Pure aggressive or benevolent strategy may be not suitable for the case. To solve this problem, the current paper proposes a new cross efficiency approach based on a series of common weights of each two DMUs. An example is given to illustrate our method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of the relationship between sustainability and software performance Health information exchange adoption: influences of public insurance programs Evaluation of risk causing factors for the incidence of neck and shoulder pain in adolescents using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process Technical debt reduction using epsilon-Nash equilibrium for the perturbed software refactor game model Performance evaluation of arc welding processes for the manufacturing of pressure vessel using novel hybrid MCDM technique
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1