种姓的现代性:高等教育、不平等和种姓为保留地位而斗争

Dag-Erik Berg
{"title":"种姓的现代性:高等教育、不平等和种姓为保留地位而斗争","authors":"Dag-Erik Berg","doi":"10.1017/9781108779616.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As an integral part of India's modernity, caste is not simply a phenomenon in rural areas or in extreme cases of caste-related violence. It is part of everyday life in modern institutions, where it represents a contingent element in social relations. Caste is, overall, subject to several types of conflicts, ranging from public debates and democratic interaction to humiliation and outright exclusion. In practice, caste is manifested in different ways; it is often identified in terms of politics of inequality, which involves large clusters of castes as well as caste-based discrimination. On the one hand, inequality and struggles for material resources animate caste-based mobilization that presses for new entitlements to reserved quotas. This mobilization comprises radically different groups, from the powerful landowning Jats in north India to the destitute Madigas in Telugu-speaking regions in south India. On the other hand, there is even caste-based discrimination in higher education institutions, which has become more visible in recent years. According to modernization theory, religion will lose its relevance and tradition will be replaced with a new set of values which are specifically modern. The American political scientists Lloyd and Susanne Rudolph argued in the 1960s that this opposition between modernity and tradition, which was prominent in the European Enlightenment and in Marx's writings, was inadequate. Although they thought that the opposition was heuristically useful, their idea was that modernity and tradition infiltrated each other and that caste was used as an instrument for political mobilization. Their seminal argument is modest and outdated today, and their approach does not quite explain the force with which caste has played out in modern institutions such as higher education institutions. The controversies regarding caste in higher education and public employment are important when examining why caste seems to be reproduced and even to gain a new intensity in contemporary India. The mechanism of oppression in the Dalit situation is not confined to rural areas. Context matters. But the ontological drive of caste appears to be an integral part of modernity that plays out in different ways, as case studies on the higher education sector suggest. The politics of reservation policies involves groups and goes beyond electoral politics, but reservation policies also affect elections. The two most central controversies regarding caste-based reservation in India were related to the implementation of the Mandal Commission Report .","PeriodicalId":130384,"journal":{"name":"Dynamics of Caste and Law","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modernity of Caste: Higher Education, Inequality and Caste Struggles for Reservation\",\"authors\":\"Dag-Erik Berg\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/9781108779616.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As an integral part of India's modernity, caste is not simply a phenomenon in rural areas or in extreme cases of caste-related violence. It is part of everyday life in modern institutions, where it represents a contingent element in social relations. Caste is, overall, subject to several types of conflicts, ranging from public debates and democratic interaction to humiliation and outright exclusion. In practice, caste is manifested in different ways; it is often identified in terms of politics of inequality, which involves large clusters of castes as well as caste-based discrimination. On the one hand, inequality and struggles for material resources animate caste-based mobilization that presses for new entitlements to reserved quotas. This mobilization comprises radically different groups, from the powerful landowning Jats in north India to the destitute Madigas in Telugu-speaking regions in south India. On the other hand, there is even caste-based discrimination in higher education institutions, which has become more visible in recent years. According to modernization theory, religion will lose its relevance and tradition will be replaced with a new set of values which are specifically modern. The American political scientists Lloyd and Susanne Rudolph argued in the 1960s that this opposition between modernity and tradition, which was prominent in the European Enlightenment and in Marx's writings, was inadequate. Although they thought that the opposition was heuristically useful, their idea was that modernity and tradition infiltrated each other and that caste was used as an instrument for political mobilization. Their seminal argument is modest and outdated today, and their approach does not quite explain the force with which caste has played out in modern institutions such as higher education institutions. The controversies regarding caste in higher education and public employment are important when examining why caste seems to be reproduced and even to gain a new intensity in contemporary India. The mechanism of oppression in the Dalit situation is not confined to rural areas. Context matters. But the ontological drive of caste appears to be an integral part of modernity that plays out in different ways, as case studies on the higher education sector suggest. The politics of reservation policies involves groups and goes beyond electoral politics, but reservation policies also affect elections. The two most central controversies regarding caste-based reservation in India were related to the implementation of the Mandal Commission Report .\",\"PeriodicalId\":130384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dynamics of Caste and Law\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dynamics of Caste and Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108779616.008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dynamics of Caste and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108779616.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为印度现代化不可或缺的一部分,种姓不仅仅是农村地区的一种现象,也不仅仅是与种姓有关的暴力的极端案例。它是现代制度中日常生活的一部分,代表着社会关系中的一个偶然因素。总的来说,种姓受到几种冲突的影响,从公开辩论和民主互动到羞辱和彻底的排斥。在实践中,种姓以不同的方式表现出来;它通常被认为是政治上的不平等,涉及大量的种姓群体以及基于种姓的歧视。一方面,不平等和对物质资源的争夺推动了基于种姓的动员,促使人们争取保留配额的新权利。这场动员包括了完全不同的群体,从印度北部强大的土地所有者贾特人到印度南部泰卢格语地区贫困的马迪加人。另一方面,高等教育机构甚至存在基于种姓的歧视,这在近年来变得更加明显。根据现代化理论,宗教将失去其相关性,传统将被一套新的具有现代性的价值观所取代。20世纪60年代,美国政治学家劳埃德和苏珊娜·鲁道夫(Lloyd and Susanne Rudolph)认为,在欧洲启蒙运动和马克思著作中突出的现代性与传统之间的对立是不够的。尽管他们认为反对是有益的,但他们的想法是,现代和传统相互渗透,种姓被用作政治动员的工具。他们的开创性论点在今天看来是谦虚和过时的,他们的方法并不能完全解释种姓制度在高等教育机构等现代机构中发挥的作用。关于高等教育和公共就业中的种姓制度的争议,在研究为什么种姓制度似乎在当代印度重现,甚至获得新的强度时,是很重要的。达利特处境中的压迫机制并不局限于农村地区。环境很重要。但种姓的本体论驱动似乎是现代性的一个组成部分,以不同的方式发挥作用,正如对高等教育部门的案例研究所表明的那样。保留政策的政治是团体政治,是超越选举政治的政治,但保留政策也会影响选举。关于印度基于种姓的保留制度的两个最主要的争议与曼达尔委员会报告的执行有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Modernity of Caste: Higher Education, Inequality and Caste Struggles for Reservation
As an integral part of India's modernity, caste is not simply a phenomenon in rural areas or in extreme cases of caste-related violence. It is part of everyday life in modern institutions, where it represents a contingent element in social relations. Caste is, overall, subject to several types of conflicts, ranging from public debates and democratic interaction to humiliation and outright exclusion. In practice, caste is manifested in different ways; it is often identified in terms of politics of inequality, which involves large clusters of castes as well as caste-based discrimination. On the one hand, inequality and struggles for material resources animate caste-based mobilization that presses for new entitlements to reserved quotas. This mobilization comprises radically different groups, from the powerful landowning Jats in north India to the destitute Madigas in Telugu-speaking regions in south India. On the other hand, there is even caste-based discrimination in higher education institutions, which has become more visible in recent years. According to modernization theory, religion will lose its relevance and tradition will be replaced with a new set of values which are specifically modern. The American political scientists Lloyd and Susanne Rudolph argued in the 1960s that this opposition between modernity and tradition, which was prominent in the European Enlightenment and in Marx's writings, was inadequate. Although they thought that the opposition was heuristically useful, their idea was that modernity and tradition infiltrated each other and that caste was used as an instrument for political mobilization. Their seminal argument is modest and outdated today, and their approach does not quite explain the force with which caste has played out in modern institutions such as higher education institutions. The controversies regarding caste in higher education and public employment are important when examining why caste seems to be reproduced and even to gain a new intensity in contemporary India. The mechanism of oppression in the Dalit situation is not confined to rural areas. Context matters. But the ontological drive of caste appears to be an integral part of modernity that plays out in different ways, as case studies on the higher education sector suggest. The politics of reservation policies involves groups and goes beyond electoral politics, but reservation policies also affect elections. The two most central controversies regarding caste-based reservation in India were related to the implementation of the Mandal Commission Report .
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Foundations of Caste and Constitutional Democracy: Ambedkar, Equality and Law Law beyond Untouchability: From Temple Entry to Atrocity and Legal Change Conclusions on Caste and Law Casteism and the Tsundur Atrocity The Karamchedu Killings and the Struggle to Uncover Untouchability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1