基于同意的隐含裸许可

Poorna Mysoor
{"title":"基于同意的隐含裸许可","authors":"Poorna Mysoor","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198858195.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines consent-based implied bare licences, considering situations where the copyright owner impliedly grants a licence gratuitously, meaning nothing (whether payment or any other form of consideration) flows to the copyright owner in return for the licence. The modern relevance of a consent-based implied bare licence lies in its application to the copyright work placed on the internet by its owner or with her consent. It examines the case law in the light of the framework proposed in Chapter 3, that separates the conduct of consenting separately from the knowledge required to consent. It also discusses the revocability of bare licences. A consent-based bare licence can be revoked, since the ability to grant such a licence and to revoke it (upon reasonable notice) both originate from the powers of the copyright owner. However, there are situations where these licences cannot be revoked, and the courts have ascribed proprietary estoppel as the reason for irrevocability.","PeriodicalId":385124,"journal":{"name":"Implied Licences in Copyright Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consent-based Implied Bare Licences\",\"authors\":\"Poorna Mysoor\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780198858195.003.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter examines consent-based implied bare licences, considering situations where the copyright owner impliedly grants a licence gratuitously, meaning nothing (whether payment or any other form of consideration) flows to the copyright owner in return for the licence. The modern relevance of a consent-based implied bare licence lies in its application to the copyright work placed on the internet by its owner or with her consent. It examines the case law in the light of the framework proposed in Chapter 3, that separates the conduct of consenting separately from the knowledge required to consent. It also discusses the revocability of bare licences. A consent-based bare licence can be revoked, since the ability to grant such a licence and to revoke it (upon reasonable notice) both originate from the powers of the copyright owner. However, there are situations where these licences cannot be revoked, and the courts have ascribed proprietary estoppel as the reason for irrevocability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":385124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Implied Licences in Copyright Law\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Implied Licences in Copyright Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198858195.003.0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implied Licences in Copyright Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198858195.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章研究基于同意的隐含裸许可,考虑版权所有者隐含地无偿授予许可的情况,这意味着版权所有者没有获得许可的回报(无论是付款还是任何其他形式的对价)。基于同意的默示裸许可的现代意义在于,它适用于由其所有者或经其同意放置在互联网上的版权作品。它根据第三章提出的框架来考察判例法,将同意的行为与同意所需的知识分开。它还讨论了裸许可证的可撤销性。基于同意的裸许可可以撤销,因为授予这种许可和撤销许可(在合理通知后)的能力都源于版权所有者的权力。然而,在某些情况下,这些许可不能撤销,法院将所有权禁止反悔视为不可撤销的理由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Consent-based Implied Bare Licences
This chapter examines consent-based implied bare licences, considering situations where the copyright owner impliedly grants a licence gratuitously, meaning nothing (whether payment or any other form of consideration) flows to the copyright owner in return for the licence. The modern relevance of a consent-based implied bare licence lies in its application to the copyright work placed on the internet by its owner or with her consent. It examines the case law in the light of the framework proposed in Chapter 3, that separates the conduct of consenting separately from the knowledge required to consent. It also discusses the revocability of bare licences. A consent-based bare licence can be revoked, since the ability to grant such a licence and to revoke it (upon reasonable notice) both originate from the powers of the copyright owner. However, there are situations where these licences cannot be revoked, and the courts have ascribed proprietary estoppel as the reason for irrevocability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Consent-based Implied Contractual Licences Final Remarks Browsing and Streaming Indexing Hyperlinking
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1