数据科学专家社交网络:从个人关注者列表到社交网络结构

Daniel McDonald, John Anderson
{"title":"数据科学专家社交网络:从个人关注者列表到社交网络结构","authors":"Daniel McDonald, John Anderson","doi":"10.1109/IETC47856.2020.9249094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The researchers combined two lists of 28 favorite “data science experts to follow on Twitter” to seed a Twitter network and analyze whether the recommended experts were indeed amongst the most influential “data science experts” on Twitter. They analyzed the resulting Twitter network to find the most important nodes in terms of popularity, quality of connections, types of roles played, such as bridges, and node ability to quickly spread information. They found that only some of the recommended experts appeared most influential given the network analysis. They also found that the experts on the list landed mainly in two sub-groups. Starting with a writer's favorite list of experts may be helpful in seeding a more comprehensive list.","PeriodicalId":186446,"journal":{"name":"2020 Intermountain Engineering, Technology and Computing (IETC)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Data Science Expert Social Network: From Personal Follower List to Social Network Structure\",\"authors\":\"Daniel McDonald, John Anderson\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IETC47856.2020.9249094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The researchers combined two lists of 28 favorite “data science experts to follow on Twitter” to seed a Twitter network and analyze whether the recommended experts were indeed amongst the most influential “data science experts” on Twitter. They analyzed the resulting Twitter network to find the most important nodes in terms of popularity, quality of connections, types of roles played, such as bridges, and node ability to quickly spread information. They found that only some of the recommended experts appeared most influential given the network analysis. They also found that the experts on the list landed mainly in two sub-groups. Starting with a writer's favorite list of experts may be helpful in seeding a more comprehensive list.\",\"PeriodicalId\":186446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 Intermountain Engineering, Technology and Computing (IETC)\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 Intermountain Engineering, Technology and Computing (IETC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IETC47856.2020.9249094\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 Intermountain Engineering, Technology and Computing (IETC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IETC47856.2020.9249094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究人员将28位最受欢迎的“在Twitter上关注的数据科学专家”的两份名单结合起来,建立了一个Twitter网络,并分析被推荐的专家是否确实是Twitter上最有影响力的“数据科学专家”。他们分析了最终的推特网络,从受欢迎程度、连接质量、所扮演的角色类型(如桥梁)和节点快速传播信息的能力等方面找到了最重要的节点。他们发现,在网络分析中,只有一些被推荐的专家看起来最有影响力。他们还发现,名单上的专家主要分为两个小组。从一个作家最喜欢的专家列表开始,可能有助于建立一个更全面的列表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Data Science Expert Social Network: From Personal Follower List to Social Network Structure
The researchers combined two lists of 28 favorite “data science experts to follow on Twitter” to seed a Twitter network and analyze whether the recommended experts were indeed amongst the most influential “data science experts” on Twitter. They analyzed the resulting Twitter network to find the most important nodes in terms of popularity, quality of connections, types of roles played, such as bridges, and node ability to quickly spread information. They found that only some of the recommended experts appeared most influential given the network analysis. They also found that the experts on the list landed mainly in two sub-groups. Starting with a writer's favorite list of experts may be helpful in seeding a more comprehensive list.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Virtual Reality Training in Electric Utility Sector - An Underground Application Study Case Different assignments as different contexts: predictors across assignments and outcome measures in CS1 2020 Intermountain Engineering, Technology and Computing (IETC) Micromachining of Silicon Carbide using Wire Electrical Discharge Machining Stereophonic Frequency Modulation using MATLAB: An Undergraduate Research Project
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1