{"title":"数据科学专家社交网络:从个人关注者列表到社交网络结构","authors":"Daniel McDonald, John Anderson","doi":"10.1109/IETC47856.2020.9249094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The researchers combined two lists of 28 favorite “data science experts to follow on Twitter” to seed a Twitter network and analyze whether the recommended experts were indeed amongst the most influential “data science experts” on Twitter. They analyzed the resulting Twitter network to find the most important nodes in terms of popularity, quality of connections, types of roles played, such as bridges, and node ability to quickly spread information. They found that only some of the recommended experts appeared most influential given the network analysis. They also found that the experts on the list landed mainly in two sub-groups. Starting with a writer's favorite list of experts may be helpful in seeding a more comprehensive list.","PeriodicalId":186446,"journal":{"name":"2020 Intermountain Engineering, Technology and Computing (IETC)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Data Science Expert Social Network: From Personal Follower List to Social Network Structure\",\"authors\":\"Daniel McDonald, John Anderson\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IETC47856.2020.9249094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The researchers combined two lists of 28 favorite “data science experts to follow on Twitter” to seed a Twitter network and analyze whether the recommended experts were indeed amongst the most influential “data science experts” on Twitter. They analyzed the resulting Twitter network to find the most important nodes in terms of popularity, quality of connections, types of roles played, such as bridges, and node ability to quickly spread information. They found that only some of the recommended experts appeared most influential given the network analysis. They also found that the experts on the list landed mainly in two sub-groups. Starting with a writer's favorite list of experts may be helpful in seeding a more comprehensive list.\",\"PeriodicalId\":186446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 Intermountain Engineering, Technology and Computing (IETC)\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 Intermountain Engineering, Technology and Computing (IETC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IETC47856.2020.9249094\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 Intermountain Engineering, Technology and Computing (IETC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IETC47856.2020.9249094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Data Science Expert Social Network: From Personal Follower List to Social Network Structure
The researchers combined two lists of 28 favorite “data science experts to follow on Twitter” to seed a Twitter network and analyze whether the recommended experts were indeed amongst the most influential “data science experts” on Twitter. They analyzed the resulting Twitter network to find the most important nodes in terms of popularity, quality of connections, types of roles played, such as bridges, and node ability to quickly spread information. They found that only some of the recommended experts appeared most influential given the network analysis. They also found that the experts on the list landed mainly in two sub-groups. Starting with a writer's favorite list of experts may be helpful in seeding a more comprehensive list.