{"title":"二进制卷积码的最小距离解码","authors":"A. Clark","doi":"10.1049/IJ-CDT.1978.0046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper considers four novel decoders that come close to achieving minimum-distance decoding of convolutional codes, but without requiring nearly as much storage or nearly as many operations per received data symbol as does the Viterbi-algorithm decoder. The methods of operation of the decoders are first described and the results of computer simulation tests are then presented, comparing the tolerances of the decoders to additive white Gaussian noise with that of a Viterbi-algorithm decoder. Four different rate½ -binary convolutional codes and three different distance measures are used in the tests.","PeriodicalId":344610,"journal":{"name":"Iee Journal on Computers and Digital Techniques","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimum-distance decoding of binary convolutional codes\",\"authors\":\"A. Clark\",\"doi\":\"10.1049/IJ-CDT.1978.0046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper considers four novel decoders that come close to achieving minimum-distance decoding of convolutional codes, but without requiring nearly as much storage or nearly as many operations per received data symbol as does the Viterbi-algorithm decoder. The methods of operation of the decoders are first described and the results of computer simulation tests are then presented, comparing the tolerances of the decoders to additive white Gaussian noise with that of a Viterbi-algorithm decoder. Four different rate½ -binary convolutional codes and three different distance measures are used in the tests.\",\"PeriodicalId\":344610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iee Journal on Computers and Digital Techniques\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1978-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iee Journal on Computers and Digital Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1049/IJ-CDT.1978.0046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iee Journal on Computers and Digital Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1049/IJ-CDT.1978.0046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Minimum-distance decoding of binary convolutional codes
The paper considers four novel decoders that come close to achieving minimum-distance decoding of convolutional codes, but without requiring nearly as much storage or nearly as many operations per received data symbol as does the Viterbi-algorithm decoder. The methods of operation of the decoders are first described and the results of computer simulation tests are then presented, comparing the tolerances of the decoders to additive white Gaussian noise with that of a Viterbi-algorithm decoder. Four different rate½ -binary convolutional codes and three different distance measures are used in the tests.