检索有效性度量差异的特征

Timothy Jones, Paul Thomas, Falk Scholer, M. Sanderson
{"title":"检索有效性度量差异的特征","authors":"Timothy Jones, Paul Thomas, Falk Scholer, M. Sanderson","doi":"10.1145/2766462.2767824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many IR effectiveness measures are motivated from intuition, theory, or user studies. In general, most effectiveness measures are well correlated with each other. But, what about where they don't correlate? Which rankings cause measures to disagree? Are these rankings predictable for particular pairs of measures? In this work, we examine how and where metrics disagree, and identify differences that should be considered when selecting metrics for use in evaluating retrieval systems.","PeriodicalId":297035,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Features of Disagreement Between Retrieval Effectiveness Measures\",\"authors\":\"Timothy Jones, Paul Thomas, Falk Scholer, M. Sanderson\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2766462.2767824\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many IR effectiveness measures are motivated from intuition, theory, or user studies. In general, most effectiveness measures are well correlated with each other. But, what about where they don't correlate? Which rankings cause measures to disagree? Are these rankings predictable for particular pairs of measures? In this work, we examine how and where metrics disagree, and identify differences that should be considered when selecting metrics for use in evaluating retrieval systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":297035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2766462.2767824\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2766462.2767824","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

许多IR有效性度量是由直觉、理论或用户研究驱动的。一般来说,大多数有效性度量都是相互关联的。但是,如果它们不相关呢?哪些排名导致测量结果不一致?这些排名对于特定的衡量标准是可预测的吗?在这项工作中,我们检查度量不一致的方式和位置,并确定在选择用于评估检索系统的度量时应该考虑的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Features of Disagreement Between Retrieval Effectiveness Measures
Many IR effectiveness measures are motivated from intuition, theory, or user studies. In general, most effectiveness measures are well correlated with each other. But, what about where they don't correlate? Which rankings cause measures to disagree? Are these rankings predictable for particular pairs of measures? In this work, we examine how and where metrics disagree, and identify differences that should be considered when selecting metrics for use in evaluating retrieval systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Regularised Cross-Modal Hashing Adapted B-CUBED Metrics to Unbalanced Datasets Incorporating Non-sequential Behavior into Click Models Time Pressure in Information Search Modeling Multi-query Retrieval Tasks Using Density Matrix Transformation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1